APC Australia

WHATEVER HAPPENED TO FIREWIRE?

-

USB’s main rival in the early years was FireWire. In 1987, Apple, IBM and others started working together on a new high-speed interface. By 1995, it was ready, and it was technicall­y something of a triumph. FireWire — or IEEE 1394, as it is more properly known — could manage 400Mbps in both directions simultaneo­usly, supply up to 1.5A at 30V, and daisy-chain up to 63 hot-swappable devices. Apple added it to its Macs. Sony used it on its first generation of semi-profession­al digital video cameras. Microsoft and Intel took an interest. It looked as though it was going to be a thing.

On the cusp of success, the wheels started to fall off. The collaborat­ive effort had also produced 261 patents across 10 companies. Apple decided it wanted US$1 per port royalty payment. A fuss was made, and eventually the cost was dropped to $0.25, which was to be distribute­d to all parties. The damage was done, though. Intel pulled out in a huff and added USB support to its motherboar­d chipsets, rather than FireWire. USB had reached version 2.0 by this point, and the speed difference had eroded. Motherboar­d manufactur­ers could add USB at very little cost, while supporting FireWire meant adding an extra controller chip and paying royalties. Most didn’t bother. Peripheral­s went with USB, and that was that.

Faster versions — FireWire 400 and 800 — couldn’t save it. In 2008, Apple started dropping it from new Macs; 2012 saw the last FireWire Apple product. There were other issues that didn’t help: different non-compatible cables for each iteration, and confusing names (Sony called it iLink). It survives here and there, mostly in DV, but as a mainstream PC technology, it is dead. Royalty payments can make you a fortune — just ask IBM. However, they are always resented. If the success of a product is in the hands of others, then asking for substantia­l royalty payments is also asking for trouble.

 ??  ??

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from Australia