Open Letter to the Prime Minister
Since the recent cuts to the budget by the Abbott government there has been unanimous concern for the impact the cutback in arts will hold for Australian culture. The across the board cuts to the Australia Council and Screen Australia threatens a grave impact for small to medium arts organisations as well as individual practitioners. The decrease in funding will result in fewer government grants for emerging artists and the harsh truth that fewer films and television programmes are likely to be produced. A dynamic part of Australian identity, the loss of funding will be a long-term impediment on the growth and cultural vibrancy of the arts in Australia.
Published recently in the Guardian, united practitioners in the arts community, including Christos Tsiolkas, JM Coetzee, Don Watson, Shaun Tan and Robert Drewe penned their concern and frustration to the Prime Minister Tony Abbott.
Dear Prime minister Tony Abbott, Treasurer Joe Hockey and Minister for Arts George Brandis,
We view with dismay the many proposed changes to health, education and welfare support announced in the 2014 budget, and fear that the consequences these changes are likely to have will be dire for our most vulnerable citizens: the young, the elderly, the disadvantaged and Indigenous Australians.
We also strongly object to the reduction in arts funding, specifically the Australia Council’s loss of $28.2m (not to mention the attack on Australian screen culture with cuts of $38m to Screen Australia’s budget and a massive $120m cut from the ABC and SBS over the coming four years). This decrease in federal support will be devastating to those who make art of any kind in this country, and many important works, works that would inform national debate and expand the horizons of Australia and its citizens, will simply never be made. Ultimately, these cuts will impoverish Australian culture and society.
Cutting the support the Australia Council offers will mean the loss of libraries, galleries, museums, concerts, regional tours, writing centres, and community and regional arts centres. In 2009, 11m people visited an art gallery. To give that number context, it’s more people than went to the AFL and NRL combined. Those numbers tell us what many already know: that art is as crucial a part of our national identity as sport. Australians are passionate about creating, attending, consuming and investing in art.
The sector is “central to the social life of Australians”, as last year’s Creative Australia policy noted, and “an increasingly important part of the economic mainstream”. Following two comprehensive government reviews and a long process of consultation, the Creative Australia policy had promised to invest an additional $200m in the sector; there is no mention of this additional funding in the current budget.
Importantly, the arts sector is one of the largest employers in the country. “In 2011, cultural industries directly employed 531,000 people, and indirectly generated a further 3.7m jobs,” critic and writer Alison Croggon recently observed. “Copyright industries were worth $93.2bn to the Australian economy in 2007, with exports worth more than $500m.” The Australian Bureau of Statistics found that in 2008–9, the arts contributed $86bn to the Australian GDP – that is, 7% – $13bn of which flowed directly from our field, literature and print media.
It is worth noting that the mining sector only provides $121bn to the GDP, and employs fewer workers (187,400 directly, 599,680 indirectly), yet receives far more government financial support at federal and state levels. Government support of the arts is vital to civic participation, as well as employment, innovation, growth, education, health, trade and tourism. The arts, the Australian Bureau of Statistics found in 2011, help build a “socially inclusive society”, one that makes people feel of value, and encourages greater participation in employment, education, training and volunteering.
Australia has a long history of valuing the arts and supporting its artists and writers. The Commonwealth Literary Fund was first started in 1908 and eventually became the Literature Board, before moving to the auspices of the Australia Council. The $200m in grants the Australia Council as a whole currently bestows enables large organisations, such as the Australian Ballet, to put on annual programs, but also allows regional companies such as Back to Back Theatre or Bangarra Dance Theatre to tour internationally. It helps decades-old publications continue to foster a love of literature, finding and supporting new writers who will become tomorrow’s great Australian authors.
The loss of funding indicated in the 2014 budget will devastate these smaller organisations and practitioners, robbing Australia of a whole generation of artists, writers, publishers, editors, theatre makers, actors, dancers and thinkers. Crucially, it will deprive people, particularly in rural and regional areas and in remote communities, of the opportunity to create, educate, learn and collaborate. These proposed funding cuts endanger us intellectually, artistically and severely damage our reputation internationally. Moreover, we fear the prospect of a world of culture and art that is unaffordable to the majority of Australians.
You have an opportunity now to restore and increase funding to the arts. We ask you that you don’t devalue our artists or their work, and instead recognise what art offers Australia.