Landscape Architecture Australia
A civic cultivation
Darling Square by Aspect Studios is a dynamic example of landscape architecture’s role in leading urban regeneration.
Darling Square is a dynamic example of landscape architecture’s role in urban design. Review by Simon Kilbane.
Darling Square Darling Harbour, New South Wales
Built on the land of the Gadigal people of the Eora Nation
Aspect Studios
Darling Square is located within the broader Darling Harbour precinct, an area arguably emerging as the happening end of the Sydney CBD, with an increasingly busy skyline and streets and a growing network of public city spaces. Configured in tandem with large publicprivate partnerships, these new public spaces offer a variety of experiences for the community, that will be increasingly valued in the context of Sydney’s growing and densifying urban condition. Situated midway along the partly pedestrian, 1.1-kilometre-long, 20-metre-wide spine that links Darling Harbour to Central Station, via Tumbalong Boulevard and Quay Street, Darling Square by Aspect Studio’s Sydney office, is a diverse, inclusive and community-focused addition to the public space menu that is both welcoming and successful.
Here is a people-oriented public space that complements nearby large-scale spaces (for instance, Darling Harbour and Darling Quarter) with intimate minor spaces designed to flexibly accommodate local events and community gatherings of between one and one hundred people. Where once the Sydney Entertainment Centre and its multistorey parking were the focus, a new market square, a green and a series of laneways tie together a whole new set of urban experiences and occupation. In this project, Aspect has played to its strengths, building upon a rich record of urban place experimentation and the detailed design of the human experience, to accommodate a new and burgeoning urban community. This community is diverse and includes a mix of local residents, international tourists, office and construction workers, a significant local student population and a growing nomadic workforce who are seeking alternatives to the traditional office environment through these new spaces.
By providing the setting for the diversity of contemporary ways that people use space, the project offers a clear
manifestation of what American urban sociologist Ray Oldenburg termed “third places,”1 referring to the places where the community spends time between home and work.
In the contemporary city, this workforce is increasingly distributed, and ever more demanding and savvy. Aspect’s skill is perhaps most evident then, in the creation of a broad spectrum of places to inhabit and to sit, with at least ten different clever types of formal and informal seating evident across the square, green and narrow laneways that compose the project in its entirety. In the project’s Steam Mill Lane, for instance, low seating walls cleverly facilitate adjacent restaurant use, while facilitating level changes. The walls create a degree of (deliberate) congestion that, along with the luminous artworks hanging above, contribute to the laneway’s perpetual buzz that extends from day well into the evening.
The project also involved delivery of a new cultural building, the Darling Exchange. Low enough to not overshadow the green, this landmark building designed by Kengo Kuma and Associates offers an instantly memorable (or perhaps Instagrammable) advertisement for the area’s rejuvenation. The building’s ground floor houses a diverse range of food options that don’t exclude students, yet still offer a degree of novelty and sophistication, and the division between the building’s interior and the surrounding landscape has been blurred through the use of porphyry stone sets that flow uninterrupted through the structure. On the upper floors, a welcoming restaurant and public library continue the community ethos that permeates the project.
From the Exchange, a playful ribbon-like pergola unfurls and integrates built form, square and green, providing generous seating and a play of light and shadow. Developed by Aspect’s project team through physical modelling, this canopy accommodates a change in level and acts as a reservoir, sheltering community from being swept into Tumbalong Boulevard’s pedestrian current. Here, an eclectic and largely native planting palette – and one that we might not expect to see in such an urban context – provides green relief from the boulevard’s hard surfaces and contrasts with the formality of the adjacent grove of Zelkova serrata (Japanese zelkova) trees that nestle by the green. These trees shelter even more generous seating, including Blue Fairy Wren chairs, designed by Eliat Rich and created by the Centre for Appropriate Technology.
Traces of the site’s Indigenous history and botanical heritage and urban morphology are subtly expressed throughout the project, manifesting as variations in paving, materiality and interpretive furniture. These reference the site’s earlier vegetation types, forms of Indigenous knowledge, a dam dating from 1855, the area’s 1880 cadastre and a previously existing sawtooth-roofed factory. Here, a secret story is revealed to the curious and while this palimpsest-style revelation of place is presumably elemental to the profession, this is not an outcome always seen in urban projects. Somewhat surprisingly, however, no memory of the site’s former Sydney Entertainment Centre is revealed, despite its significance in the history of Sydney’s musical culture.
Perhaps the most interesting development of the project however is described by Aspect’s design and strategy director Sacha Coles as “ground up urbanism.” This is not a project about “funky feature furniture,” but rather about clever and conscious, deliberative design developed by working closely with a supportive client that believed in the professional capabilities of the design team and provided a brief that prescribed “plurality” and “eclecticism.” Under the design team’s lead, a range of further design decisions have resulted that meaningfully contribute to the widespread use of the spaces and go well beyond the ground plane and a typical landscape scope. This project was not, therefore, just about the space between the buildings, nor its ornamentation, but encompassed planning that extended into, along and up the facades of buildings. In broader terms, such a scope gestures towards an attractive shift for the profession and a move from public realm to true urban design. Indeed, Aspect was given the reins to move from the ground up, to influence and inform the look and feel and even the subdivision and tenancies of the project’s buildings. Specifically, Aspect was critical to the creation of a more fine-grained tenancy mix that favours eating over retail, and further contributed to the look and feel of the buildings’ forms, patterns of doors, fenestration and materiality. This has arguably led to the area’s energy, as well as its attractiveness as a new and unique foodie destination. And why shouldn’t it? Arguably, landscape architects are the best placed urban design professionals to lead these kinds of developments, in a trend that is being increasingly seen across New South Wales (at least).
Ultimately, though, it was a shame that the ground up urbanism could not have further influenced a clear shortfall
of the project (and one beyond the Aspect’s control). While the public spaces are overwhelmingly busy, occupied and successful, the overall planning and the project’s specific obsession with car parking is disappointing. In one of the most walkable inner-city areas in Australia, this antiquated notion of what a future city requires overshadows the attractive and activated laneways, with the multiple levels of dedicated car parking (all be them attractively screened with brickwork brise-soleils) at odds with the rest of the development and its pursuit of progressive design. One wonders how much more vibrant the area could have been, not to mention how much more equitable and accessible to a wider resident sample, without this reliance on cars.
Perhaps this is the time for landscape architecture to really lead. The “ground up” urban approach will, via the virtue of projects such as these, deliver not only dynamic public spaces for new community demands, but also the broader planning that the future Australian city needs.