NPhoto

Nikon AF-S 16-35mm f/4g ED VR

£979/$997 A quite lightweigh­t but steady Nikon zoom

-

he Nikon AF-S 14-24mm f/2.8g ED might seem the most obvious contender for an ultra-wide landscape zoom for FX format DSLRS, but we prefer the equivalent Sigma Art lens, also on test. Compared with both of those, Nikon’s 16-35mm lens naturally has a less generous maximum viewing angle and aperture rating, but offers distinct advantages.

It’s relatively compact and only about two-thirds of the weight, while also adding the bonus of optical stabilizat­ion. It’s also less pricey and has a detachable hood that enables the inclusion of a 77mm filter attachment thread. The optical path includes two ED (Extra-low Dispersion) elements and Nano Crystal Coat. Build quality feels solid and the mounting plate features Nikon’s usual rubber weather-seal ring.

TPerforman­ce

The Nikon lens delivers when it comes to centre-sharpness, which is mostly spectacula­r, but drops off at the long end of the zoom. Corner-sharpness is lacklustre and, although VR is worth having, it only gives a 2.5-stop benefit.

Sharpness

It’s mostly great, but drops off substantia­lly at long zoom settings and towards the corners of the frame.

Fringing Distortion

It’s the worst lens in the group for barrel distortion, which can be noticeable at 16mm.

 ??  ??
 ??  ?? Fringing can be noticeable at wide and narrow apertures, but is low in the middle.
Fringing can be noticeable at wide and narrow apertures, but is low in the middle.
 ??  ??
 ??  ??

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from Australia