The Gold Coast Bulletin

Deputy donor promise

Cr Gates vows no more pledges if laws change

- RYAN KEEN ryan.keen@news.com.au

GOLD Coast Deputy Mayor Donna Gates vows she’ll never take another developer donation if law changes prevent recipient councillor­s voting.

Ms Gates, who represents the booming northern corridor’s division one and was elected unopposed last year, has always maintained doing everything within the law to best represent her patch.

She declared $174,000 in 2016 campaign donations, including about $80,000 from developers. Yesterday, she said from her campaign account she bought a used ute and had it branded up – and sold it again as soon as practical after the election, with proceeds returning to her political account. She also invested campaign funds in an M1 billboard, 100 T-shirts, 10 caps and 350 corflutes.

She has defended voting on developmen­t applicatio­ns linked to donors, in some cases pushing for conditions costing developers “dearly”.

The spotlight is on Queensland’s Local Government Act laws on developer donations which allow recipient councillor­s to declare perceived conflicts but still vote on developmen­t applicatio­ns.

Calls are mounting for changes to prevent councillor­s voting on matters related to donors, with Premier Annastacia Palaszczuk calling the scenario “concerning”.

Cr Gates clarified yesterday she wasn’t against changes to the laws but would hate legislatio­n to be “retrospect­ive that stopped me from being in the room”.

“If I can’t represent my community fully I would never take a donation. I’m happy to support the change as long as it’s not retrospect­ive.”

Ms Gates added where local government funding law “desperatel­y needs changing” is around donation declaratio­ns required by candidates so they reflect the net cost of a campaign, enabling candidates to deduct expenses.

Her campaign funding was raised at events she put on at which she charged $185 a ticket, costing her $130.

“I never had $174,000, the events were very expensive.”

“They were all donations but I haven’t taken off what it cost me to put on events I had and that hasn’t been taken off cost of my campaign.

“I still had a campaign, I still wrote to every resident in division one and wanted them to know about my passion, what I had done the past few years and what I had planned for future. That comes at a cost.”

Asked how she was going at the end of a week which started with her breaking down when talking to the Bulletin about the donations controvers­y, she said: “Just dandy, I’m fine”.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from Australia