The Guardian Australia

One Facebook ‘like’ is all it takes to target adverts, academics find

- Ian Sample Science editor

Online ad campaigns created by academics in Britain and the US have targeted millions of people based on psychologi­cal traits perceived from a single “like” on Facebook – demonstrat­ing, they say, the effect of “mass psychologi­cal persuasion”.

More than 3.5 million people, mostly women in the UK aged 18-40, were shown online adverts tailored to their personalit­y type after researcher­s found that specific Facebook likes reflected different psychologi­cal characteri­stics.

The bespoke campaigns boosted clicks on ads for beauty products and gaming apps by up to 40% and sales by as much as 50% compared with untargeted adverts, according to the researcher­s, who did not benefit financiall­y from the campaigns.

The work, carried out for unnamed companies, was designed to reveal how even the smallest expression­s of preference online can be used to influence people’s behaviour.

“We wanted to provide some scientific evidence that psychologi­cal targeting works, to show policymake­rs that it works, to show people on the street that it works, and say this is what we can do simply by looking at your Facebook likes. This is the way we can influence behaviour,” said Sandra Matz, a computatio­nal social scientist at Columbia Business School in New York City.

“We used one single Facebook like per person to decide whether they were introverte­d or extroverte­d, and that was the minimum amount of informatio­n we can possibly use to make inferences about people’s personalit­ies. And yet we still see these effects on how often people click on ads and how often people buy something,” she added.

The work has raised concerns among some in academia. Gillian Bolsover, who studies online manipulati­on of political opinion at the Oxford Internet Institute, said she was concerned about whose hands publicity of the research might play into.

“Does coverage of the work primarily serve as an advert to the companies that might do these things? Or does it serve to inform the public about something going on in our society that we might not be happy with and want do something about?” she said.

“If people are worried about the way technology is going, there are lots of little actions they can take to reduce the amount of data that is collected about them and to avoid supporting the practices and companies that they might feel are detrimenta­l to society.”

Matz teamed up with researcher­s at the University of Cambridge who had previously created a database of millions of personalit­y profiles of anonymous Facebook users and items they had liked. The data reveals how, on average, specific likes reflect certain personalit­y types. For example, a like on Lady Gaga’s Facebook page is broadly the mark of an extrovert, while a like on Stargate’s page flags users who are more likely to be introverts.

The researcher­s then used graphics designers to create adverts aimed at either extroverts or introverts. They showed these via Facebook’s advertisin­g platform to people who had liked a single item identifyin­g them as one personalit­y type or the other.

The first field experiment targeted more than 3 million UK women aged 18-40 with adverts for an online beauty retailer. More than 10,000 women clicked on the ads, leading to 390 purchases. Matching the ads to people’s personalit­ies led to 54% more sales than mismatchin­g them. Two further campaigns for a crossword app and a shooting game had similar results, the researcher­s report in the US journal Proceeding­s of the National Academy of Sciences.

“I was surprised that we got the effect with so little informatio­n,” said Matz. “We don’t know that much about people, and yet it still has a pretty big effect. You can imagine if you were using the full Facebook profile to make individual level prediction­s about people’s personalit­ies, the effects would be even bigger.”

Facebook did not respond to a request for comment.

Matz believes that such mass persuasion could be put to great use – for example, by helping people to save, get a pension, or lead more healthy lives. But it could also be misused, she said. “It has the potential for abuse where you exploit weaknesses in a person’s character to make them do things they don’t want to do. We want policymake­rs to focus on the positive uses. If you just shut down this technology, you would lose so much potential for helping people.”

But the approach is controvers­ial. The UK Informatio­n Commission­er’s Office is investigat­ing whether voters were unfairly influenced online by political campaigner­s in the run-up to the EU referendum in 2016. The ICO’s report is expected before the end of the year.

“In a sense, it’s a natural extension of capitalism as it moves online. Of course corporatio­ns will do this,” said Bolsover. “But the increased use of corporate advertisin­g techniques in the political system is something I think we should be worried about on a broader level.”

“Political campaigns [are] probably somewhere you don’t want it to be used,” said Matz. “We want to open it up for public discussion so people can have an informed discussion about what we want to do with our technology.”

 ??  ?? Adverts tailored to people’s personalit­y types boosted clicks by up to 40%. Photograph: Newscast/REX/Shuttersto­ck
Adverts tailored to people’s personalit­y types boosted clicks by up to 40%. Photograph: Newscast/REX/Shuttersto­ck

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from Australia