Wanneroo Weekender - - Opinion -

IT was men­tioned on the news that there are many el­derly peo­ple liv­ing in large, mainly empty homes who would love to down­size, but are afraid to do so.

The rea­son given would be that the money de­rived from the sale of their prop­erty would no longer en­ti­tle them to their full pen­sion. This would make them worse off fi­nan­cially.

The gen­tle­man in ques­tion pro­posed a scheme which would cor­rect the sit­u­a­tion, thus en­abling the pen­sioner to avoid los­ing a por­tion of the pen­sion and, at the same time, free­ing hun­dreds and even thou­sands of fam­ily homes to young fam­i­lies who need them.

I am per­son­ally rather un­easy about this type of ap­proach.

From what one hears, young fam­i­lies seem to find it al­most im­pos­si­ble to save an ad­e­quate amount of money for a de­posit on a rea­son­ably sized home.

And, even if some do have the ca­pac­ity to do so, it doesn’t take long for some greedy prop­erty in­vestor with a large sum of ready cash to step in at an auc­tion and to over­ride the as­pir­ing young fam­ily by snatch­ing the home away without any qualms.

I may be wrong, but I am con­vinced that by per­suad­ing the hap­less pen­sioner that ‘it is in his or her in­ter­est to down­size’ for the ben­e­fit of the younger gen­er­a­tion’s ac­com­mo­da­tion needs, nei­ther party will have a home in the end.

Too many out­siders and peo­ple with money will take ad­van­tage of both the younger buyer and older seller. ROSA DOUGHTY-LARSEN, River­ton.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from Australia

© PressReader. All rights reserved.