‘Lord Evil’ still on bail, cur­few re­vised Two years for theft and bur­glary

Daily Nation (Barbados) - - Front Page -

AN­DRE OMAR “LORD EVIL” to 6 a.m. cur­few. JACKMAN re­mains out on bail. Crown Coun­sel Oliver

When he ap­peared in Thomas had pre­vi­ously cham­bers in the No. 4 Supreme asked the court to ex­er­cise Court yes­ter­day, Act­ing High its dis­cre­tion and re­voke Court Jus­tice Al­rick Scott Jackman’s bail af­ter he was re­vised the cur­few of the caught in breach of his cur­few, 38-year-old mur­der ac­cused, at 11:54 p.m., by po­lice. of Stroud Bay Road, Crab Hill, But his le­gal team of Arthur St Lucy. Holder, Sha­dia Simp­son,

Jackman had been hauled Danielle Mot­t­ley and Rhea be­fore the court for al­legedly Layne had ar­gued that this breach­ing one of his bail was the first time Jackman con­di­tions on Oc­to­ber 28, had breached con­di­tions. one of which was a 9 p.m. They said he had been obey­ing the re­stric­tions of his bail, in­clud­ing re­port­ing to po­lice daily.

In con­ced­ing that Jackman had only breached his cur­few on one in­stance, the act­ing judge re­verted his cur­few back to the orig­i­nal time of 7 p.m. to 6 a.m.

In do­ing so, he warned Jackman that any breach of the court was grave, and cau­tioned him to com­ply with its or­ders.

That cur­few had ini­tially been put in place by Jus­tice Olson Al­leyne. How­ever, Jus­tice Jac­que­line Cor­nelius had given him a bit more free­dom last year, ex­tend­ing it from 9 p.m. to 6 a.m.

Jackman is on $175 000 bail in con­nec­tion with the May 10, 2016 mur­der of Charly Dume.

( Ex­emp­tion from In­come Tax) Act ( IBC Act) were mod­est in their ex­pec­ta­tions that the ac­tiv­i­ties of IBCS would gen­er­ate “a tremen­dous amount of cler­i­cal work and em­ploy­ment”, ex­pec­ta­tions were not re­alised as the act failed to at­tract com­pa­nies to es­tab­lish in Bar­ba­dos in the clar­i­fied. A res­i­dent IBC could now num­bers ex­pected or hoped for. ben­e­fit from tax con­ces­sions where it

The ac­cepted view is that the lim­ited car­ried on “trade in the sell­ing of ser­vices achieve­ment of the 1965 IBC Act which, if orig­i­nat­ing in Bar­ba­dos, are for, stemmed from the un­cer­tainty as to what or on ac­count of, peo­ple res­i­dent out­side con­sti­tuted “man­age­ment and con­trol” Bar­ba­dos or out­side any other coun­try and hence “res­i­dence”, the fact that an that is a party to the Treaty” (as de­fined ex­empted com­pany could not carry on by the Caribbean Com­mu­nity Act). trade in the buy­ing or sell­ing of goods or An IBC was deemed to be “res­i­dent” ser­vices “in, or orig­i­nat­ing in, the is­land” in Bar­ba­dos “where it is in­cor­po­rated and that the IBC would only know if its un­der the laws of Bar­ba­dos or where its prof­its or gains would ben­e­fit from the busi­ness is man­aged and con­trolled in rel­e­vant tax con­ces­sions if “within the Bar­ba­dos” and an IBC “shall be deemed pre­scribed time af­ter the ex­pi­ra­tion of to be man­aged and con­trolled in an in­come year the com­pany sat­is­fies Bar­ba­dos where it holds its an­nual the Com­mis­sioner that dur­ing the whole gen­eral meet­ings and the ma­jor­ity of that in­come year it was an ex­empted com­pany within the mean­ing of this act”.

The 1977 amend­ments to the IBC Act sought to ad­dress the per­ceived de­fi­cien­cies of the ex­ist­ing act. ( Harold Bernard H. B. St John The Se­nate duly passed the bill, Gov­er­nor (later Sir Harold), who led the John Stow as­sented to it on July 19, 1965, de­bate deal­ing with the amend­ments, and its com­mence­ment ac­knowl­edged that the IBC Act in date was stated as July 26, 1965. its ex­ist­ing form had failed to at­tract

Then Pre­mier (later Prime Min­is­ter) in­ter­na­tional com­pa­nies as had Er­rol Walton E.W. Bar­row, in pre­sent­ing been done in other ter­ri­to­ries the bill in the House of Assem­bly, in the Caribbean. in­di­cated that it sought to ex­empt in­ter­na­tional busi­ness com­pa­nies (IBCS) Link with tourism from pay­ing in­come tax in whole or in He felt that a suc­cess­ful IBC regime part pro­vided that those com­pa­nies were could re­sult in in­creased em­ploy­ment of not car­ry­ing on busi­ness, in the ac­cepted Bar­ba­di­ans al­though he, too, nar­rowly sense of the word, within the is­land. per­ceived such in­creased em­ploy­ment

In his view, the pur­pose of the bill to be re­stricted to the “cler­i­cal and was to en­cour­age “well es­tab­lished ad­min­is­tra­tive” area. Mr St John, and rep­utable busi­nesses to es­tab­lish how­ever, recog­nised the po­ten­tial link of­fices” in Bar­ba­dos so as to gen­er­ate with tourism since busi­ness peo­ple em­ploy­ment “in the form of cler­i­cal would utilise our ho­tels when at­tend­ing ser­vices, pro­cess­ing, ac­count­ing and di­rec­tors’ and other meet­ings. that kind of thing”. Pur­suant to the rel­e­vant amend­ments,

Al­though, the framers of the the un­cer­tain­ties per­tain­ing to res­i­dence In­ter­na­tional Busi­ness Com­pa­nies and the “sell­ing of ser­vices” were




Newspapers in English

Newspapers from Barbados

© PressReader. All rights reserved.