Rose Mc­gowan back on Twit­ter

Movies Ac­tor has been vo­cal about ha­rass­ment al­le­ga­tions

StarMetro Halifax - - MOVIES -

Twit­ter on Thurs­day re­stored Rose Mc­gowan’s ac­count af­ter tem­po­rar­ily sus­pend­ing it and caus­ing an out­cry that it had muted one of the cen­tral fig­ures in the al­le­ga­tions against Har­vey We­in­stein.

The episode, Twit­ter said Thurs­day, was be­cause Mc­gowan tweeted a pri­vate phone num­ber, a prac­tice it said vi­o­lated its ser­vice terms. The com­pany said it will “be clearer about th­ese poli­cies and de­ci­sions in the fu­ture.’’

Mc­gowan’s sus­pen­sion caused an enor­mous back­lash on so­cial me­dia, with many crit­i­ciz­ing Twit­ter for a move that would si­lence an al­leged vic­tim of sex­ual ha­rass­ment by Har­vey We­in­stein. Jes­sica Chas­tain and An­thony Bour­dain were among those who ques­tioned Twit­ter’s ac­tion.

On her In­sta­gram ac­count, Mc­Gowan an­nounced her sus­pen­sion late Wed­nes­day, warn­ing that “there are pow­er­ful forces at work.’’

Mc­gowan has been among the most vo­cal in Hol­ly­wood about sex­ual abuse in the in­dus­try. The New York Times ear­lier re­ported that she was among the nu­mer­ous women who ac­cused We­in­stein of sex­ual ha­rass­ment, and that she re­ceived a fi­nan­cial set­tle­ment in 1997, which in­cluded pro­vi­sions about speak­ing about the case in the fu­ture.

“Any al­le­ga­tions of non-con­sen­sual con­tact are un­equiv­o­cally de­nied by Mr. We­in­stein,’’ We­in­stein rep­re­sen­ta­tive Sal­lie Hofmeis­ter said Wed­nes­day.

Getty Im­ages

Mc­gowan at­tends a film pre­miere in new york City.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from Canada

© PressReader. All rights reserved.