National Post

Millennial ANGST

HOW LOW RATES ARE PLACING AN IMPOSSIBLE SAVINGS BURDEN ON NEXT GENERATION.

- Jonathan Chevreau Financial Post Jonathan Chevreau is the co- author of Victory Lap Retirement and can be reached at jonathan@findepende­ncehub.com

Chronicall­y low interest rates have been a scourge for older folk saving for retirement. But, coupled with falling equity returns, there may be an even bigger problem for millennial­s wanting to retire. A new study by San Franciscob­ased personal finance website NerdWallet warns that just to retire by age 70, today’s millennial­s would have to save a whopping 22 per cent of yearly income.

That’s a depressing finding when you consider that most retirement experts have recommende­d saving just 15 per cent of annual income. Now if millennial­s could earn the seven- percent average annual return stocks have generated historical­ly ( since 1950), they could achieve the common goal of replacing 80 per cent of working income by age 67, merely by saving 13 per cent of annual income. That assumes a 25-year-old earning $ 40,000, which is the median average salary for those in their late 20s.

Unfortunat­ely, if pessimisti­c prediction­s pan out that the U. S. economy will generate slower growth going forward, then stock- market returns of only five per cent a year would bring about the gloomier scenario. Indeed, one expert — Margin Small, head of US iShares for BlackRock — told NerdWallet that “the era of super- normal returns is over. Over the longer term, younger investors should expect yields and equity- market returns to be low.”

NerdWallet urges millennial­s to start saving now and to put aside as much as possible. That’s not a huge ask: One survey by Transameri­ca Center for Retirement found 72 per cent of millennial­s are already saving for retirement, and 30 per cent are saving a respectabl­e 10 per cent of income.

As always, what counts is time in the market and resisting the urge to procrastin­ate. NerdWallet found that if a 25- year- old puts saving off until the age of 35, he or she would have to save a “nearly impossible” 34 per cent of income every year ($16,400 on average), to retire at 67 with 80 per cent of the income they earned in their working years. Again, that assumes the more pessimisti­c future stock returns of five per cent rather than seven per cent.

Time may be on the millennial­s’ side, but when they do save, they’re going to have to make sure their money gets a decent return. That means not just saving in lowyieldin­g savings accounts, but properly investing it in growth- oriented equity funds. And when they do, they should pay attention to investment costs. NerdWall et says exchange- traded funds ( ETFs) provide both low fees and offer quick and easy diversific­ation. NerdWallet found that compared to higher- fee vehicles like mutual funds, millennial­s could save hundreds of thousands of dollars just by using ETFs over a lifetime.

It also mentions roboadvise­rs, most of which also use ETFs, but package them up in convenient set-it- andforget packages, typically at 0.5 per cent a year on top of the ETF fees.

LOWER STOCK RETURNS BRING ABOUT A GLOOMIER SCENARIO.

 ??  ??
 ?? GETTY IMAGES ?? To retire by age 70, today’s millennial­s would have to save a whopping 22 per cent of yearly income, a new study says.
GETTY IMAGES To retire by age 70, today’s millennial­s would have to save a whopping 22 per cent of yearly income, a new study says.
 ??  ??

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from Canada