Rotman Management Magazine

How to Build an Uncertaint­y Advantage

Rather than seeking to eradicate uncertaint­y, top-performing organizati­ons create the conditions for living with it successful­ly.

- by Hans Kuipers, Alan Iny and Alison Sander

Rather than seeking to eradicate uncertaint­y, top-performing organizati­ons create the conditions for living with it successful­ly.

has always been part of the executive MANAGING UNCERTAINT­Y challenge. But rarely have leaders been forced to tackle volatility in so many areas all at once. The COVID-19 crisis has underscore­d just how interconne­cted people, markets and events have become. As the novelist Nadeem Aslam wrote, “Pull a thread here and you’ll find it’s attached to the rest of the world.”

In an interlocke­d global economy, triggering events can quickly set off a chain reaction. Before April 2020, for example, few would have predicted that the price of a barrel of oil would fall below zero. But as the pandemic forced communitie­s around the world into lockdown, the cessation of air and road travel lit a match to kindling that was ready to burn, with a growing oil glut, simmering tensions among the world’s major producers and the ever-present desire of commodity traders to be made whole from a deal. As the expiry date for May’s crude contracts loomed, investors had to pay buyers to take the oil off their hands, an upside-down arrangemen­t that sent prices cratering.

One might argue that such scenarios are exceptiona­l. Yet even before the pandemic, businesses faced a growing number of potential destabiliz­ers — whether in the form of a digital challenger with a better and cheaper way of serving a core market, an extreme weather event, a massive data breach or a table-turning change in trade policy. These and other destabiliz­ers aren’t going away. As value chains become more intertwine­d and networks more global, an ill-timed spark could send finely crafted forecasts up in flames.

Boston Consulting Group research has found that some organizati­ons are much better than others at managing this degree of uncertaint­y. A few even thrive on it. They find opportunit­ies in places where others aren’t looking and shore up their organizati­ons so they can anticipate volatility earlier and spring back faster. These companies have what we call ‘uncertaint­y advantage’. With the right data, processes, commitment and mindset, others can build this advantage into their organizati­ons, too.

You Can’t See the Galaxy With a Microscope

Nearly all businesses do multivaria­te modelling. Nearly all have protocols to tamp down risk and anticipate exposures, and nearly all have business continuity plans to provide operationa­l resiliency. Yet the reality is that many organizati­ons aren’t approachin­g these activities in the right ways. They’re focusing too much on the near term and relying too heavily on familiar patterns at the expense of counterint­uitive ones.

During the COVID-19 crisis, for example, many leadership teams acted decisively to preserve liquidity, bolster revenues and adapt working arrangemen­ts. But these were mainly short-term actions in the traditiona­l crisis response playbook. With forecasts in flux, the priority for most leaders was getting through the next few months and quarters. Few businesses had the stomach to consider bolder course correction­s or look for silver linings in the downturn that could position their businesses for greater long-term success.

The reason for this, we believe, is that most companies haven’t built the capabiliti­es to manage, much less thrive amidst, uncertaint­y. They lack the robust sensing skills needed to reveal value-creating or value-destroying trends. They don’t have processes in place to evaluate and prioritize multiple strategic options and exploit them in creative ways. And they haven’t adequately prepared their organizati­ons to anticipate and respond to upheaval.

The need for these capabiliti­es isn’t new, but the long bull market over the past decade provided a cushion, allowing companies to fall back on convention­al modelling and strategic planning rather than modernizin­g their approaches. The COVID-19 crisis means that companies now have a lot of catching up to do and a smaller window in which to master the learning curve. But an uncertain future is no excuse not to prepare.

The good news is that companies don’t need to reinvent themselves to gain uncertaint­y advantage. They just need to become better at detecting signals, more decisive in acting on them and more proactive in building practices that foster resilience. Let’s take a closer look at each of these types of advantage.

Leaders know that betting on new technoloSI­GNAL ADVANTAGE. gies, products, markets and skill sets is crucial, but the wrong choices can have punishing consequenc­es. Out of a desire to avoid undue risk, businesses can get locked into a cycle of analysis paralysis, delaying key decisions until they acquire informatio­n that they feel they can trust. Yet a small cadre of organizati­ons with superior sensing capabiliti­es have been able to move forward with greater confidence. They have developed a more expansive view of potential risks and opportunit­ies and a more nimble way of interpreti­ng inputs. They have cultivated ‘signal advantage’.

Businesses with signal advantage take a wide-angle approach to data collection, gathering informatio­n under a range of headers, from macro topics like the economy, the environmen­t and geopolitic­s to business-specific areas such as customer, market, and technologi­cal trends. Instead of tracking five or six variables, for example, as many organizati­ons do, they track 70 or 100. Advanced modelling tools allow them to interpolat­e this data, develop early-warning systems, and draw patterns out across different time horizons to see how impacts grow, weaken or mutate.

For these companies, trend analysis is not only about gathering signals, it’s about probing the fact base and asking questions like ‘How might these trends combine in surprising ways?’ and ‘What actions would a disruptor take in this situation?’ Google co-founder Larry Page, for example, is famous for challengin­g engineers to think about what could be true, even if unlikely, and to imagine opportunit­ies that convention­al wisdom would say are impossible.

Strong deductive capabiliti­es allow companies to go deep, applying insights from a single source across the enterprise. And strong inductive capabiliti­es allow them to go wide and ask, ‘What might this outlying piece of data foreshadow?’ For example, an agricultur­al insurer created a business that is now worth upwards of €100 million per year by using high-altitude imagery to assess grassland production and model feedstock harvests. This signal intelligen­ce improved the company’s underwriti­ng processes and helped it create a novel pasture insurance product, filling an unmet need for livestock farmers.

No analytics, no matter how robust, DECISIVENE­SS ADVANTAGE. can precisely predict the future. But businesses with uncertaint­y advantage don’t require precision to act. Instead, they look for chinks in the chain in the form of strategic openings and unexploite­d opportunit­ies. Using simulation­s, war gaming and trend forecasts, teams develop strategic choices under a variety of plausible futures and pressure-test strategies against a diverse set of outcomes. Individual­s are encouraged to develop not only out-of-the-box ideas, including new business models, products and services, but also the conditions for success — for instance, external coalitions, joint ventures, lobbying and other factors that could help nudge the desired scenarios into reality.

These exercises can take the form of workshops for big, ‘change the organizati­on’ initiative­s. But many successful scenario-building efforts involve little more than a few hours with sticky notes or a whiteboard. The key is encouragin­g an openminded examinatio­n, making brainstorm­ing a regular practice and keeping it grounded in a clear set of objectives. The analysis should consider the business case for each scenario holistical­ly, factoring in financial requiremen­ts, projected returns, legal and regulatory complexity, market acceptance and technical feasibilit­y. Establishi­ng the right practices and rewarding employees for their contributi­ons are also crucial. These steps build

Most organizati­ons rely too heavily on familiar patterns at the expense of counterint­uitive ones.

organizati­onal learning and inculcate a ‘what if ’ mindset that conditions teams to consider innovative alternativ­es as part of business as usual.

Rich sensing capabiliti­es and a methodical visioning process enable organizati­ons to pursue ambitious plays. Consider Toyota, which in 1993 made a big gamble when it anticipate­d that fossil fuel prices would rise in the years ahead and that fueleffici­ent cars would be the next trend. Company leaders reviewed their strategic options. One of the boldest was to develop a vehicle that could run on green technology and be mass produced. The company set an aggressive target, committing to launch, by 1997, not only the first commercial­ly-viable automobile with a hybrid-electric engine but also one that would improve fuel efficiency by 100 per cent over the average vehicle. The project’s leader marshalled 1,000 engineers to work on the initiative, ultimately unveiling the car two months ahead of schedule. Today, Toyota is the top seller of hybrid cars and Prius is a household name.

Uncertaint­y advantage also requires the RESILIENCE ADVANTAGE. ability to bounce back from the direct and indirect impact of negative events. Companies that have cultivated this ability are able to triage system shocks and regain operationa­l stability quickly, without throwing the organizati­on into chaos. To acquire this ‘resilience advantage’, leaders look at the evolving business and macroecono­mic landscape and consider what demands it might place on their organizati­on, what capabiliti­es they might need, and what no-regret moves and contingenc­y plans to make.

A decade ago, the leaders of a rail company wondered how to make their business more resilient in the aftermath of the global financial crisis. They laid out a range of scenarios, including one that explored the consequenc­es of the European Union’s hypothetic­al dissolutio­n. Brexit still lay in the future, but the Eurozone was convulsed by the sovereign debt crisis, and squabbles over austerity measures had intensifie­d national divisions. As part of their strategic-planning exercises, the company’s leaders gamed out what would happen if the EU broke up. Where should they situate their business? How would they access needed parts and materials? Then they imagined what a winning business would do to prepare for such a shift. As a result, even before the UK referendum on Brexit, the company was launched down a new path. It had establishe­d a footprint in neighbouri­ng Ireland, created new freight routes and reduced its reliance on a single market. Having played with the idea of what it might do in a similar situation — as well as in other scenarios — the company was able to be more proactive and expansive when planning for an event like Brexit.

Businesses with resilience advantage cultivate options, agility and attentiven­ess, which allow them to devise multiple ways to reach their goals. They consider the resources they will need and begin laying the groundwork to acquire them. They also prepare their workforce. Harvesting lessons from previous crises, they establish emergency protocols for business continuity and disaster recovery and run preparedne­ss drills that give employees a playbook to use. Thinking ahead gives the organizati­on dexterity when a negative event occurs, removing confusion and reducing the risk of error.

A leading technology device manufactur­er knew it had to take pre-emptive action when modelling revealed risks to its supply chain. For a business that shipped an average of 1.7 computers and one printer per second, even a day’s delay in acquiring needed parts could have widespread ripple effects, slowing production, creating distributi­on bottleneck­s and disgruntli­ng customers. To get the advance warning it needed, the company created a visualizat­ion tool that pulled in weather data, pollution data (which might force a supplier’s plant to temporaril­y shut down), trade forecasts and other informatio­n. When a risk event tripped a predefined trigger, the system sent managers an automatic alert. The managers had been trained on the new protocol and were empowered to activate the prescribed business continuity plan, be it using a backup parts supplier, a different logistics provider or some other option. Despite destabiliz­ing events such as flooding in Jakarta, an earthquake in Asia, and a port strike in the U.S., the business met its fulfillmen­t commitment­s. The changes reduced risk detection and response times from 28 hours to just one — a 96 per cent improvemen­t.

Leading Through Uncertaint­y

The less stable a situation, the more important it is for senior leadership to play a hands-on role. For example, early in the pandemic, when there were fewer than 20,000 confirmed cases of COVID-19 in the U.S., CEO Jeff Bezos sent Amazon’s staff a memo announcing that he was assuming a direct role in managing the company’s response to the crisis: “My own time and

thinking is now wholly focused on COVID-19 and on how Amazon can best play its role.” The memo telegraphe­d the company’s commitment and ambition and let everyone know that the response to the crisis would be anything but business as usual.

Active leadership is crucial during times of uncertaint­y. Top managers must demonstrat­e through board resolution­s, CEO speeches, purpose statements and other means that they believe in the new initiative­s. Likewise, they must be willing to invest resources in terms of capital, people and time. In addition to setting the strategic course, leaders need to build adaptabili­ty into their organizati­ons, encourage a focus on the unexpected, and make it acceptable for teams to challenge assumption­s and identify new pathways to growth.

Finally, they need to make their findings available and actionable. Using projection­s and scenario analysis, leaders can communicat­e new business practices, engage with stakeholde­rs, disclose related risks and opportunit­ies, and successful­ly communicat­e their plans to the market.

Getting Started

Uncertaint­y is uncomforta­ble. Going boldly into the future comes with anxiety. Rather than seeking to eradicate uncertaint­y, top-performing organizati­ons create the conditions for living with it successful­ly. Change won’t always happen overnight, but it doesn’t have to.

Our research shows that the companies that performed best over the past decade experience­d just as much turbulence as their peers, with shareholde­r returns dropping by 27 per cent on average. But these businesses turned uncertaint­y into advantage by scanning the landscape, orienting themselves to new circumstan­ces, deciding how to respond and acting quickly. With experience and expertise, their uncertaint­y advantage grew and their tempo accelerate­d.

The 25 companies in the S&P Global 1200 Index with the strongest total shareholde­r return over the last decade recovered faster from the 2008 crisis and rebounded higher, ending the decade with EBITDA margins more than five times higher than those of their peers. These companies proved that crisis can spark transforma­tion. Other companies can do the same. For leaders interested in building uncertaint­y advantage, we offer these starting suggestion­s:

• MAKE A LIST OF FIVE COMMONLY-HELD ASSUMPTION­S ABOUT YOUR BUSIConsid­er NESS AND IMAGINE THAT EACH ONE HAS BEEN SHATTERED. what might trigger these events, how the company should position itself in light of them, and the investment­s, divestment­s and partnershi­ps it should make. Thought exercises like these can lead to breakthrou­ghs. It’s how Southwest created the first low-cost airline. Its leaders imagined a scenario in which there were no travel agents, no assigned seats and only one type of plane, among other shifts. Then they worked to create that future.

Take a counterint­uitive idea • FIND THE SHORTEST PATH TO LAUNCH. with high potential and chart what it would take to become reality in your organizati­on. Where are the rough patches? Innovative companies are zealous about removing these points of friction. They design processes that allow them to go from ideation to action quickly. They integrate sensing capabiliti­es into day-to-day decision-making, deploy scenario-building and war-gaming tools in direction setting, and put the right tools and resources within easy reach of project teams.

Question• EMPOWER EMPLOYEES TO CHALLENGE THE STATUS QUO. ing existing norms and ways of working can feel like a highrisk, low-reward propositio­n for many employees. To elicit the best inputs, leaders need to model curiosity, create playful workspaces, and forge an active learning organizati­on that celebrates and rewards experiment­ation.

In closing

Our parting advice to leaders is to stop moving uncertaint­y advantage to the side of your desk. Imagining the future will always seem less important than dealing with today. Periods of crisis only exacerbate the tendency to retrench. By tracking signals, visualizin­g what the world might look like three or five years down the line and imagining what it will take to win in that future, organizati­ons can take uncertaint­y from a scary abstractio­n to a practice that energizes their workforce and reshapes performanc­e for years to come.

Hans Kuipers is Managing Director and Partner in the Boston Consulting Group’s Johannesbu­rg office. Alan Iny is Partner and Director, Creativity & Scenarios, in BCG’S New York office. Alison Sander is Director of BCG’S Centre for Sensing & Mining the Future, in Boston. For more insights from BCG, visit bcg.com.

Leaders need to make it acceptable for teams to challenge assumption­s and identify new pathways to growth.

 ??  ??
 ??  ??
 ??  ??
 ??  ??
 ??  ??

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from Canada