Po­lice re­view We­in­stein claims

‘We all make mis­takes,’ says for­mer movie pro­ducer ac­cused of sex­ual as­sault

The Intelligencer (Belleville) - - WORLD NEWS - COLLEEN LONG THE AS­SO­CI­ATED PRESS

NEW YORK — Po­lice de­tec­tives in New York City and Lon­don are tak­ing a fresh look into sex­ual as­sault al­le­ga­tions against Har­vey We­in­stein now that some 30 women have ac­cused the Hol­ly­wood film pro­ducer of in­ap­pro­pri­ate con­duct.

New York Po­lice Depart­ment spokesman Peter Don­ald said Thurs­day that in­ves­ti­ga­tors are re­view­ing po­lice files to see if any­one else re­ported be­ing as­saulted or ha­rassed by him.

So far, no filed com­plaints have been found, he said, other than one well-known case that prompted an in­ves­ti­ga­tion in 2015, but au­thor­i­ties are en­cour­ag­ing any­one with in­for­ma­tion on We­in­stein to con­tact the depart­ment.

Lon­don po­lice were also look­ing into a claim it had re­ceived from the Mersey­side force in north­west Eng­land, Bri­tish me­dia re­ported Thurs­day. Mersey­side po­lice said the al­le­ga­tion was made a day ear­lier and con­cerned “an al­leged sex­ual as­sault in the Lon­don area in the 1980s.”

Some 30 women — in­clud­ing ac­tresses An­gelina Jolie, Ash­ley Judd and Gwyneth Pal­trow — have spo­ken out re­cently to say We­in­stein had sex­u­ally ha­rassed or sex­u­ally as­saulted them. We­in­stein was fired Sun­day by The We­in­stein Co., a stu­dio he co­founded with his brother.

Some of the al­le­ga­tions in­volved con­duct at ho­tels in Bev­erly Hills, but po­lice there didn’t re­turn calls on whether they were in­ves­ti­gat­ing any pos­si­ble crimes. The Los An­ge­les Po­lice Depart­ment has no open in­ves­ti­ga­tions.

De­tec­tives in the NYPD’s spe­cial vic­tims unit were in­structed to iden­tify and speak with any po­ten­tial vic­tims, in­clud­ing the women who spoke about their en­coun­ters with We­in­stein in a re­cent

New Yorker ar­ti­cle, ac­cord­ing to a law en­force­ment of­fi­cial briefed on the mat­ter who spoke to The As­so­ci­ated Press on con­di­tion of anonymity.

In the New Yorker ex­pose, a for­mer ac­tress, Lu­cia Evans, said We­in­stein forced her to per­form oral sex in 2004 when she was a col­lege stu­dent.

At least one other un­named wo­man said she was raped by We­in­stein, but the ar­ti­cle did not dis­close when or where it hap­pened. A third wo­man, ac­tress Asia Ar­gento, told the magazine that We­in­stein forcibly per­formed oral sex on her in 1997 at a ho­tel in France.

Un­der New York law, mak­ing some­one en­gage in oral sex by phys­i­cal force or the threat of it is a first-de­gree crim­i­nal sex­ual act. There’s no le­gal time limit for bring­ing charges.

We­in­stein, through a spokes­woman, has de­nied any non­con­sen­sual sex­ual con­duct with any women.

The me­dia mogul has long been a ma­jor fig­ure at the Academy Awards, where his films have reg­u­larly won Os­cars.

He reap­peared briefly on Wed­nes­day out­side a Los An­ge­les home, telling the pa­parazzi he’s “not do­ing OK,” but he’s hop­ing for a “sec­ond chance,” ac­cord­ing to video posted by celebrity web­site TMZ. He also told the pho­tog­ra­phers he needs to “get help” and “we all make mis­takes.”

New York de­tec­tives al­ready in­ves­ti­gated We­in­stein once, the 2015 probe when an Ital­ian model said the stu­dio ex­ec­u­tive grabbed her breasts and groped her. De­tec­tives set up a sting where they recorded a con­ver­sa­tion between the wo­man and

We­in­stein while he tried to per­suade her to come into his ho­tel room.

“Why yes­ter­day you touch my breast?” the 22-year-old asked on the record­ing, pub­lished by the New Yorker.

“Oh, please, I’m sorry, just come on in. I’m used to that. Come on. Please,” We­in­stein re­sponded.

Man­hat­tan District At­tor­ney Cyrus R. Vance Jr. said pros­e­cu­tors de­cided there wasn’t enough ev­i­dence to pros­e­cute the case.

“I, like they, were very dis­turbed by the con­tents of the tape,” Vance said. “But at the end of the day we op­er­ate in a court­room of law, not the court of pub­lic opin­ion. And our sex crime pros­e­cu­tors made a de­ter­mi­na­tion that this was not go­ing to be a prov­able case.”

Po­lice in­ves­ti­gated that al­le­ga­tion as a case of forcible touch­ing, a mis­de­meanour with a two-year time limit for bring­ing charges. The statute of lim­i­ta­tions has since ex­pired.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from Canada

© PressReader. All rights reserved.