Toronto Star

Deposit protection needs boost

- Bob Aaron

An interim report on the Tarion warranty corporatio­n should have gone further to protect homebuyers’ purchase deposits.

Special adviser J. Douglas Cunningham, in releasing the initial report of the independen­t review, last week told the Star he didn’t “know enough about it quite frankly to make a comment.”

That must be disappoint­ing to the unlucky purchasers left in fear of losing their deposits following the bankruptcy restructur­ing of Toronto developer Urbancorp.

Tarion’s limit for deposit protection is fixed at $20,000 on condominiu­ms and $40,000 on homes.

This protection hasn’t been changed in years, while home prices and deposit amounts have skyrockete­d.

Back in June, I suggested Tarion deposit protection should be increased to $200,000 on all purchases, whether freehold or condominiu­m.

Tarion fired back on its website, saying my view “has been advanced without any supporting research on actual claims data.

“Tarion regularly monitors all of our claims data to ensure the warranty remains effective. Last year, we reviewed deposit claims over a five-year period and found that the average claim was only $29,000 — well within the $40,000 limit.”

The key word in Tarion’s rebuttal is “average.” No mention was made of the largest claims, or those in excess of the deposit protection, or the total amount of consumer losses.

Tarion added that raising the limits of Ontario’s deposit warranty would “very likely” result in a significan­t enrolment fee increase for all new homes across the province, and could have the unintended consequenc­e of increasing deposit amounts requested by builders.

In my view, one consumer loss is too many.

The Urbancorp disaster is not unique. In 2003, two dozen buyers purchased units in Jarvis Mansions, at 539 Jarvis St.

Four years later, developer Panterra Mansions went into receiversh­ip with some of the units virtually completed.

The purchase agreements were terminated, and although the purchasers received their deposits back, they got nothing for the thousands of dollars they had spent in upgrades.

As well, they all lost four years of appreciati­on in value representi­ng tens of thousands of dollars per unit.

Back in 2009, I wrote about a couple who signed an agreement to buy a condominiu­m in Parry Sound, Ont., and handed the builder a deposit of $40,000. Tarion only covered $20,000.

Together, three purchasers lost a total of $76,000.

Two years ago, Toronto lawyer Meerai Cho was charged with 426 counts of fraud after $14.9 million in deposits was released to developer Joseph Lee and Centrium Developmen­t Group.

A total of 180 residentia­l purchasers had to go to court to get back $9 million in deposits.

However, there was no protection for the buyers of the commercial units.

Financial problems in condo developmen­ts are not uncommon.

The Whitby Yacht Club developmen­t, Queen West Vintage Lofts and Avante were all taken over by new developers.

The purchase agreements were terminated, although the deposits were refunded.

Tarion and the Ontario government need to step up to the plate, increase deposit protection, and ensure that once an agreement is signed, it is binding on any developer who takes over the project. Bob Aaron is a Toronto real-estate lawyer. He can be reached at bob@aaron.ca on his website aaron.ca, and Twitter @bobaaron2.

The deposit protection hasn’t been changed in years, while home prices and deposit amounts have skyrockete­d

 ?? DREAMSTIME ?? An interim report on the Tarion warranty corporatio­n should have gone further to protect homebuyers’ purchase deposits, writes Bob Aaron.
DREAMSTIME An interim report on the Tarion warranty corporatio­n should have gone further to protect homebuyers’ purchase deposits, writes Bob Aaron.
 ??  ??

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from Canada