Toronto Star

BATTLE SCARS

Some women decide against breast reconstruc­tion after cancer surgery,

- RONI CARYN RABIN THE NEW YORK TIMES

Before Debbie Bowers had surgery for breast cancer, her doctor promised that insurance would pay for reconstruc­tion, and said she could “even go up a cup size.” But Bowers did not want a silicone implant or bigger breasts.

“Having something foreign in my body after a cancer diagnosis is the last thing I wanted,” said Bowers, 45, of Bethlehem, Pa. “I just wanted to heal.”

While plastic surgeons and oncologist­s aggressive­ly promote breast reconstruc­tion as a way for women to “feel whole again,” some doctors say they are beginning to see resistance to the surgery. Patients like Bowers are choosing to defy medical advice and social convention and remain breastless after breast cancer. They even have a name for the decision to skip reconstruc­tion: They call it “going flat.”

“Reconstruc­tion is not a simple process,” said Dr. Deanna J. Attai, a breast surgeon in Burbank, Calif., and a past president of the American Society of Breast Surgeons, adding that more of her patients, especially those with smaller breasts before diagnosis, were opting out.

Social media has allowed these women to become more open about their decision to live without breasts, as well as the challenges, both physical and emotional, that have followed. For a recent video created by wisdo.com, and widely shared on Facebook, Bowers and her friend Marianne DuQuette Cuozzo, 51, removed their shirts to show their scarred, flat chests. And Paulette Leaphart, 50, a New Orleans woman whose clotting disorder prevented her from having reconstruc­tion after a double mastectomy, walked topless from Biloxi, Miss., to Washington this summer to raise awareness about the financial struggles of cancer patients.

“Breasts aren’t what make us a woman,” Leaphart said.

The nascent movement to “go flat” after mastectomi­es challenges longheld assumption­s about femininity and what it means to recover after breast cancer. For years, medical profession­als have embraced the idea that breast restoratio­n is an integral part of cancer treatment. Women’s health advocates fought for and won approval of the Women’s Health and Cancer Rights Act of 1998. Since then, breast reconstruc­tion has become standard care. More than 106,000 reconstruc­tive procedures were done last year, a 35 per cent rise since 2000, according to the American Society of Plastic Surgeons.

In promoting the surgery, doctors cite studies that suggest breast reconstruc­tion improves a woman’s quality of life after cancer. But some

“Breasts aren’t what make us a woman.” PAULETTE LEAPHART ADVOCATE

women say that doctors focus too much on physical appearance, and not enough on the toll prolonged reconstruc­tive procedures take on their bodies and their psyches.

“That’s the dirty little secret of breast reconstruc­tion: the risk of a major complicati­on is higher than for the average elective surgery,” said Dr. Clara Lee, an associate professor of plastic surgery at Ohio State University who performs the procedure.

Cuozzo spent a year having her breasts rebuilt after a double mastectomy, but after four infections in five months, she had the implants removed.

Dr. David H. Song, chief of plastic surgery at the University of Chicago and immediate past president of the American Society of Plastic Surgeons, said that the risk of complicati­ons was real, but that focusing on them was like focusing on plane crashes when “millions of flights land safely.”

Given advancemen­ts in surgical techniques, “the esthetic result can be better than the native breast,” Song said.

But it is that kind of talk — suggesting that a reconstruc­ted breast is an improvemen­t on a woman’s natural breast — that enrages many women who have undergone mastectomi­es. For starters, a reconstruc­ted breast is often numb and can no longer play a role in sexual arousal. It often lacks a nipple, since the nipple is usually removed in a mastectomy.

After looking at photos of reconstruc­ted breasts, “I was slightly horrified,” said Charlie Scheel, 48, of Brooklyn, who decided against implants after a double mastectomy.

Rebecca Pine, a cancer survivor from Long Island who co-founded a photograph­y and writing project called “The Breast and the Sea,” said, “It’s a tremendous amount to put your body through, and it’s not like we’re going to get our breasts back.”

Coming to terms with a flat chest after breast cancer can be difficult. While some women wear a prosthesis in their bra, it is not uncommon for them to stop using it.

“They’re heavy, they’re uncomforta­ble, and they’re in a sensitive area where you have scars,” Pine said.

 ??  ??
 ?? BEATRICE DE GEA PHOTOS/THE NEW YORK TIMES ?? Rebecca Pine co-founded the art project “The Breast and the Sea.”
BEATRICE DE GEA PHOTOS/THE NEW YORK TIMES Rebecca Pine co-founded the art project “The Breast and the Sea.”
 ??  ?? Marianne DuQuette Cuozzo shared her experience alongside Bowers.
Marianne DuQuette Cuozzo shared her experience alongside Bowers.
 ??  ?? Debbie Bowers shared her story in a video widely shared on Facebook.
Debbie Bowers shared her story in a video widely shared on Facebook.
 ??  ?? Charlie Scheel didn’t want implants after having a double mastectomy.
Charlie Scheel didn’t want implants after having a double mastectomy.
 ??  ?? Paulette Leaphart has walked topless to raise awareness.
Paulette Leaphart has walked topless to raise awareness.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from Canada