Lo­ca­tion of ma­ri­jua­na stores not yet de­ter­mi­ned—Grant

Tribune Express - - AC­TUA­LI­TÉS NEWS - ALEXIA MAR­SILLO alexia.mar­sillo@eap.on.ca KRIS­TI­NA SER­VANT kris­ti­na.ser­vant@eap.on.ca

On­ta­rio has an­noun­ced the pro­vince’s plan for the dis­tri­bu­tion of ma­ri­jua­na, ahead of le­ga­li­za­tion plan­ned for next spring. Re­crea­tio­nal can­na­bis will be sold through a chain of spe­cial­ty stores ope­ra­ted by the Li­quor Con­trol Board of On­ta­rio (LC­BO).

The plan is to open 150 ma­ri­jua­na stores by the year 2020 and 40 stores by next sum­mer. Ac­cor­ding to Glen­gar­ry-Pres­cott-Rus­sell MPP Grant Crack, it has not yet been de­ter­mi­ned as to where these stores will be lo­ca­ted across the pro­vince and what that would mean for the Pres­cott-Rus­sell re­gion.

The LC­BO will be in charge of these spe­cial­ty stores, and will al­so of­fer on­line pur­cha­sing of ma­ri­jua­na. The sale price of the pro­ducts has not yet been de­ter­mi­ned by the pro­vince and will be dis­cus­sed at fur­ther consul­ta­tions bet­ween the fe­de­ral and pro­vin­cial go­vern­ments this fall. Can­na­bis use will be pro­hi­bi­ted in all pu­blic places and will on­ly be ac­cep­table in pri­vate re­si­dences. This puts a halt on all en­tre­pre­neu­rial ideas for res­tau­rants or va­por bars and lounges.

“What I could say on that is that we have full in­ten­tions to conti­nue to ma­nage this file through sub­si­dia­ries of the LC­BO,” said Crack. “There’s been no dis­cus­sion at this time that I am aware of about broa­de­ning this in­to other re­tail out­lets.”

“We have come up with a plan in a res­pon­sible man­ner to start off with 40 stores. We are not going in­to this full force right at the start,” said Crack. “We’re saying ‘Let’s try it here, let’s open these out­lets first’, and pro­vide the re­sources we feel are ne­ces­sa­ry to the dif­ferent sta­ke­hol­ders, in­clu­ding the po­lice, that are in­vol­ved and let’s see how those 40 evolve, and then 90 six months la­ter, L’On­ta­rio vient d’an­non­cer le plan de la pro­vince pour la dis­tri­bu­tion de la ma­ri­jua­na, en vue de la lé­ga­li­sa­tion l’an pro­chain. Le can­na­bis ré­créa­tif se­ra ven­du dans une chaine de bou­tiques spé­cia­li­sées gé­rées par la so­cié­té des al­cools de l’On­ta­rio. La pro­vince en­vi­sage d’avoir 150 ma­ga­sins de ma­ri­jua­na dès l’an­née 2020, et 40 ma­ga­sins l’été pro­chain. Se­lon le dé­pu­té de Glen­gar­ry-Pres­cott-Rus­sell, Grant Crack, on n’a tou­jours pas dé­ter­mi­né où se­ront si­tués ces ma­ga­sins.

and on­ly then 150 by 2020.” Re­pre­sen­ta­tives from the Ca­na­dian As­so­cia­tion of Chiefs of Po­lice, the On­ta­rio Pro­vin­cial Po­lice and the Sas­ka­toon Po­lice Ser­vice all ex­pres­sed that they al­so want the fe­de­ral go­vern­ment to re­con­si­der al­lo­wing re­si­dents to grow their own ma­ri­jua­na plants, be­cause it will be too dif­fi­cult to con­trol and can fa­ci­li­tate mi­nors in get­ting their hands on ma­ri­jua­na.

Crack al­so ex­pres­sed un­cer­tain­ty about the amount of ma­ri­jua­na stores that will be Un ar­ticle, pu­blié par

le 14 sep­tembre der­nier se­lon le­quel les Qué­bé­cois ga­gne­raient moins que la moyenne ca­na­dienne a fait ré­agir les mu­ni­ci­pa­li­tés de La­chute et de Gren­ville.

En ef­fet, ci­tant des don­nées de Sta­tis­tique Ca­na­da, l’ar­ticle men­tionne que les mu­ni­ci­pa­li­tés de La­chute et de Gren­ville trônent au som­met des villes ca­na­diennes où il y a le plus de per­sonnes pauvres.

Se­lon l’ar­ticle, à La­chute, 24,3% des mé­nages vivent avec un faible re­ve­nu alors que dans la ré­gion de Gren­ville, qui fait par­tie de l’ag­glo­mé­ra­tion de Haw­kes­bu­ry aux fins de sta­tis­tiques, 26,9 % des mé­nages vivent avec un faible re­ve­nu.

C’est par voie de com­mu­ni­qué que la Ville de La­chute a te­nu a ex­pri­mer ses pen­sées concer­nant les pro­pos vé­hi­cu­lés dans les mé­dias en éclair­cis­sant cer­taines in­for­ma­tions et en les met­tant en contexte.

« Il est vrai qu’entre 2008 et 2012, la po­pu­la­tion la­chu­toise a vu quelques-unes de ses in­dus­tries im­por­tantes fer­mer leurs portes, oc­ca­sion­nant ain­si des pertes d’em­plois. Ce­pen­dant, la fer­me­ture ou le dé­pla­ce­ment de cer­taines in­dus­tries n’est pas le seul fac­teur ayant in­fluen­cé les taux de re­ve­nus plus bas dans la ré­gion » in­dique la Ville de La­chute.

La Ville at­tri­bue éga­le­ment le vieillis­se­ment de la po­pu­la­tion et l’at­trait des ba­by­boo­mers dans la ré­gion. Se­lon les don­nées de Sta­tis­tique Ca­na­da de 2016, près de 34%

ope­ned – 150 stores by 2020 – and if that will be en­ough to sa­tis­fy the needs of the pro­vince. “Es­pe­cial­ly in ru­ral On­ta­rio, be­cause ru­ral On­ta­rians de­serve the same ac­cess, not on­ly to can­na­bis but al­so to al­co­hol in my opi­nion, that people in ur­ban areas en­joy,” he said. The pro­vin­cial go­vern­ment has not yet bog­ged down all the spe­ci­fics of this ma­ri­jua­na dis­tri­bu­tion plan and the im­pact it will have on the Pres­cott-Rus­sell area is still to be de­ter­mi­ned.

La­chute and Gren­ville see­ked to pro­vide reas­su­rances fol­lo­wing an ar­ticle in that re­por­ted that they were the poo­rest mu­ni­ci­pa­li­ties in Que­bec.

Newspapers in French

Newspapers from Canada

© PressReader. All rights reserved.