Sunken treasure reveals a secret for better wine
SAINT-MANDRIER-SURMER, France — Divers scavenging in shipwrecks slumbering at the bottom of the North Sea since World War II were disappointed not to find dazzling troves of gold and jewels.
As consolation, not only did they turn up decades-old wine, but the wine came with a bonus: it was better than equivalent vintages selling for top dollar in luxury caves.
Among the latest to test the benefits of a deep soak are Bandol winemakers in southern France who teamed up with a dive school for a yearlong experiment.
Choosing a tranquil section of a marine park off the Riviera, they submerged 120 bottles of Bandol wine to a depth of 40 meters, leaving them there for a year.
Another 120 bottles were kept in a cellar for comparison purposes.
“It’s important not just to live long but to live well,” said Guillaume Tari, head of the regional wine association, Vins de Bandol.
Submersion in deep waters “preserves the acidity bottles because there’s not much light, there’s absolutely no air, it’s relatively cool and the temperature is constant,” Tari said.
The underwater conditions — total darkness and constant temperature — are thought to initially accelerate the aging process, adding complexity to the wine.
Over longer periods, the aging process slows or stops altogether, making underwater storage excellent for conservation and explaining why shipwreck wine emerges so well.
Master sommelier Gisele Marguin took part in a blind tasting, comparing the underwater Bandols with the same wines stored in a traditional cave.
The underwater Bandol had “a nice texture in the mouth, a good structure, and notes of very ripe dark fruit ... even chocolatey,” she said.
However its “secondary aromas are not sufficiently present” — suggesting that the wine would benefit from more time with Davy Jones.
The results of similar experimentation elsewhere in France — in western Brittany and in the southwest — remain largely confidential.
But Philippe Faure-Brac, who was named the world’s best sommelier in 1992, noted that the technique costs more for the winemaker because of the extra time and logistics required.
“Lots of winemakers talk about it,” he said. “People in the spirits trade are also thinking about experimenting with cognacs and rums.”
So far underwater wines have not gone to market.
But Tari is optimistic: “Obviously if you can gain one or two decades (on the aging process), it could be worth it.”
of wine were submerged in the sea for a year then compared with wine kept in a cellar.