Local govts need more green awareness
While offering its investigation feedbacks to the government of East China’s Fujian province on Monday, the central environmental inspection team said the good ecological foundation of the province had prompted some local officials to be overoptimistic about the health of the local environment and thus not address the environmental problems, which undermined the efforts to preserve the unique local marine ecology.
The environment inspection team also discovered that the local government had failed to fully abandon local policies and rules by June 2015, as required by the top authorities, which in turn obstructed environmental protection monitoring.
What shocked the inspection team most is the Shishi local government convening a “special meeting” in December 2015 to urge the city’s environmental protection bureau to revoke an administrative punishment imposed on a local enterprise for violating the environmental protection law. The local government’s move amounted to conniving with the enterprise to breach the environmental protection law.
That some local governments have a “tolerant” attitude toward local enterprises’ actions which violate the environmental protection law is not news as such. But the Shishi local government in Fujian has set a particularly bad example by calling a special meeting to “pardon” an enterprise which had broken the environmental protection law, especially because such local officials’ behavior are rarely reported by local media outlets.
Had the central environmental inspection team not discovered the severe breach of the environmental protection law, or national media outlets not reported it, the public would not have known that a local government has gone so far as to protect a law-breaking enterprise in order to improve its performance with higher economic growth.
Why do some local governments still indulge in such malpractices?
The fundamental reason for that lies in the country’s environmental protection monitoring and management system. China’s localized environmental protection bureaus do not have the power to prevent Shishi-like malpractices or to punish the violators. So until the localized environmental protection management system is thoroughly reformed, it will be difficult to eliminate such malpractices.
The Ministry of Environmental Protection is the supreme administrative organ under the Chinese government for environmental protection supervision and management. And provincial- and lower-level environmental protection bureaus are set up under the auspices of corresponding level governments. In other words, these environmental protection bureaus are usually under the dual leadership of their local governments and higher-level environmental protection authorities.
But due to several factors, such as the asymmetrical fiscal and personnel management power, the local environmental protection bureaus end up functioning under their respective local governments. How else can one explain the Shishi local government’s move to urge the local environmental protection bureau to “repeal” the administrative punishment it had meted out to an enterprise for violating the law?
The loopholes in the dualleadership system of environmental protection were exposed years ago, which should be plugged as early as possible. Last year, the top authorities decided to change the country’s local governmentdominant environmental protection management system and adopt a vertical environmental inspection system under the provincial-level governments and planned to complete the reform within two to three years based on “experimental” measures.
It is now clear that to prevent Shishi-like fiascoes, the authorities should create favorable conditions for the implementation of the vertical management system for environmental protection agencies.
The author is a Chengdu-based freelance writer, and the article was originally published in China Youth Daily.
In September 2013, Toshinao Nakagawa, an LDP member of the lower house of parliament who is married and has three children, had a mock wedding ceremony with his mistress in Hawaii in the presence of a churchman. Apologizing to his voters for his misdeed, which he described as “lack of virtue”, Nakagawa has left the LDP and stepped down as vice-minister of economy, trade and industry. But he continues to retain his upper house seat and has said he will contest it when his term expires in December 2018 (if Abe does not call a snap election).
Eriko Imai, a member of the upper house and a single mother, according to media reports, has been having an affair with Ken Hashimoto, a member of the Municipal Assembly of Kobe city and a married man with two children. Both are LDP members.
The scandals have added to the LDP’s woes. The burning hot summer seems to be scalding the embattled prime minister. To win back public support, he agreed to be grilled by opposition lawmakers at an ad hoc parliamentary hearing for suspected cronyism on July 24-25. The opposition claims Abe had intervened to help Kake Gakuen, an educational institution whose director Kotaro Kake is a long-time friend, get the approval for opening a veterinary school in a special economic zone.
Tomomi Inada, an Abe protégé who shares his conservative values, resigned as Japan’s defense minister on July 28 over allegations that she might have covered up information related to Japan Ground Self-Defense Force’s operations during a United Nations peacekeeping mission in South Sudan.
Abe reshuffled his cabinet on Thursday, in a bid to save his political career. But to regain the trust of the Japanese people, he needs to focus on his economic initiatives so as to spur growth, which he promised while taking office in late 2012. But he has been preoccupied with several unpopular bills such as security-related legislation that for the first time allows Japan Self-Defense Forces to fight abroad.
The Japanese people are becoming increasingly skeptical about the effectiveness of Abe’s policies. And Abe has not done enough to deliver on his promises of improving the economy and changing workplace culture.
When people in Japan don’t have to work long hours, they will have more time to explore the spiritual world and address their libido. Japanese people’s abstinence means fewer and fewer babies, which could be disastrous for the country. Japan’s National Institute of Population and Social Security Research projects the country’s population will plummet from 127 million now to 88 million by 2065, and further to 51 million by 2115 if the current trends continue.
The toxic combination of a low fertility rate and an aging population will add to the gloomy prospects of the country, which has the highest amount of public debt in the world.
So until the localized environmental protection management system is thoroughly reformed, it will be difficult to eliminate such malpractices.