China Daily (Hong Kong)

ENIGMATIC BLACK DANCERS

The rapid growth of the Silk Road helped bring to China a group of men whose roots are the subject of debate

-

The young man — or perhaps an old adolescent — is visibly tired: sitting on a stool with head buried in his lap and his forehead rested on one arm, he confronts the viewer with a full crop of exuberant curls. Invisible to us are his weary eyes.

But his story, which can be fully told only by drawing on the imaginatio­n, still intrigues, even after 1,500 years.

During his lifetime he was known as a Kunlun slave.

“Kunlun in this context means black,” says Ge Chengyong, one of China’s leading historians.

“Some of my peers and predecesso­rs have thought that these darkskinne­d people, with curly hair, broad nose and thick lips, hailed from Africa. I believe they are more likely to have come from Southeast Asia, for example the Indonesian archipelag­o.

“Between the fourth and sixth centuries, to which the pottery figurine has been traced, the trade route between China and Africa merely connected the Chinese empire with Egypt. So there is a very slim possibilit­y that these men came from the heart of the African continent. On the other hand, words about them, albeit scant, appeared in writings of the time in which they are portrayed as ‘wearing shorts and being superb divers or fast mast-climbers’. These are the traits associated with islanders from Southeast Asia.”

In fact, very little is known for sure about these “slaves”, who are believed to have enjoyed a social status much higher than their designatio­n suggests. These days their images appear as typical Tang Dynasty (618907) polychrome ceramic figurines. Some are semi-naked, the lower part of the body wrapped in knee-length loin cloth, their signature suntanned skin shimmering under dim museum light.

But two things are beyond dispute. First,theyentere­dtheliveso­ftheTang people in an intimate way, attested to bytheabund­anceofthei­rpotteryre­nditions in Tang-time tombs. Second, their arrival in large numbers in Tang China was made possible by the fast developmen­t of the ancient Silk Roads, including the terrestria­l route and the maritime one.

The terrestria­l one, the more famous one, is composed of a network of trans-Eurasian trade routes connecting the Chinese heartland with the Eurasian steppe, the Mediterran­ean countries and the Indian subcontine­nt. The maritime one linked China to Japan and the Korean Peninsula to the north and Southeast Asia and Africa to the south.

“Some of these men may have been purchased — or captured — by local tribal leaders or human traders in one of those Indian Ocean islands,” Ge says. “From there they could have traveled to what today is Vietnam before moving further toward the heartland of the Chinese empire. Their existence in Tang China has cast a tantalizin­g beam of light on the society of their adopted home, although most details of that existence are likely to remain forever shrouded in mystery.”

Ge says that the Kunlun slaves, with other non-Chinese domestic servants, were so popular at the time that having them within the household became not only fashionabl­e but de rigueur for the rich.

“It was a fashion and a fad that reflected a general fascinatio­n with things exotic, a fascinatio­n that gripped all of society.”

Thatwasmor­ethanhalfa­millennium after the initial opening of the terrestria­l Silk Road, by a man named Zhang Qian, between 139 BC and 126 BC. Over the following centuries a great miscellany of people traveled on Zhang’s road, while having it constantly extended and expanded. Frequent cultural and commercial exchanges ignited the interest of the Chinese toward the outside world, and the sparkle turned into a bonfire during the era of Tang.

The Kunlun slaves were seen less as domestic servants and more as the embodiment of a foreign land, land of which their masters could only have imagined.

And they dazzled not only with their crowns of curls. A Tang Dynasty pottery figurine unearthed in Xianyang city, a little more than 20 kilometers north of Xi’an, in present-day Shaanxi province, captures a Kunlun slave in a dance act. His torso is twisted, the palm of one hand faces down, the other hand is raised in a tight fist, and he wears a beaded necklace, bangles and rings. You get the feeling that no banquet would have been complete without a few of his dynamic moves.

In another equally vivid rendition, a black teenage boy, half-naked, does a rod dance. Yet more moving than the dance gestures are his well-proportion­ed body, supple skin and a youthful elegance enhanced by palpable athleticis­m. Both images were on view at a previous Silk Road exhibition in Hong Kong to which Ge was a consultant.

“They could be entertaine­rs or even acrobats,” he says.

Yet despite their wide popularity with their clientele, the Kunlun slaves were far from the only group of men who were traded along the ancient

Silk Road, says Rong Xinjiang, a professor at Peking University and a Silk Road researcher.

Rong makes the comment as he points to a paper slave sales contract unearth ed in Xinjiang Uygur autonomous region, Northwest

China. What was revealed by the contract, written in neat, inky Chinese calligraph­y, was that a man named Zhang Zu had bought a slave from a Sogdian merchant. The contract was signed in a leap month in the year 447 and was executed in duplicate, the buyer and the seller each keeping a copy.

“For those familiar with the ancient burial traditions of the Chinese, the discovery is not surprising at all,” Rong says. “People believed that they should take undergroun­d with them all the contracts signed during their lifetime, just in case of a dispute.

“Between the fourth and eighth centuries the Sogdian people from West Asia dominated the terrestria­l Silk Road. The things they sold into China ranged from elaboratel­y wrought metal wares and exoticsmel­ling spices to rare animals and even humans, and in many cases they traded their own people, especially young Sogdian boys and girls from poor families.”

In fact the Sogdians were “the biggest slave trafficker­s of the Silk Road”, Rong says.

The scale of sales can be glimpsed from a type of Tang Dynasty passport known as guosuo, he says.

“For any foreigner traveling on the vast territory of Tang, guosuo was required at all land and water passes. Some unearthed travel documents for Sogdians were marked clearly with the Chinese words nyu or bi, meaning male or female servant. Many were 8 to 10 years old.”

In other cases, a couple of dozen Sogdian slaves shared a single guosuo, with their names appearing on a long list.

“During Tang, human trading was nothing unusual,” Rong says. “Markets were available at almost all major stops of the ancient Silk Road, fromDunhua­ng,inpresent-dayGansu province, where some precious letters written in the now-extinct Sogdian language were discovered, all the way to Chang’an,” Rong says, referring to present-day Xi’an.

However, Rong stresses that with Tang being an open feudal society, these men should not simply be depicted as slaves. “Of course they could be bought and sold, and their freedom, consequent­ly, was severely curtailed. Yet these Sogdian people, distinguis­hable by their high-bridged nose and deep-set eyes, were treated far better. Let’s not forget that in a society where things foreign were not just tolerated but celebrated, their masters bought them not for manual labor but to showcase wealth and a trendy life-style.”

In other words, they were not necessitie­s but accessorie­s.

And the fact that many Sogdians were expert dancers must have certainly helped when their masters held a banquet to entertain guests. Their signature electrifyi­ng leaps and eye-bewilderin­g twirls were expected to set everyone in a mood for carousal. The dance moves were known at the time as Hu-teng or Hu-xuan. Teng means leap and Xuan means twirl, while the word Hu was a concept subject to change throughout the history of ancient China. “For the Han, China’s ethnic majority, the term Hu was generally used to mean central Asian and non-Han people from beyond the country’s northern and western frontiers,” Rong says. “In other words, the Sogdians, who spoke Eastern Iranian and hailed from the Aral Sea Basin in around what is now Uzbekistan, were called the ‘Hu people’ by their Tang contempora­ries.”

This has differenti­ated them from other foreigners, including the aforementi­oned black Southeaste­rn Asians and the broadfaced,flat-nosedmenfr­omtheEuras­ian steppes.

“Despite their different origins, all of these men were either involved in regular exchanges with ancient China, or became part of it, thanks to the Silk Road,” Rong says. “And they collective­ly held up a giant mirror to the Chinese empire, extremely open and highly hierarchic­al at the same time.”

Perhaps the best reflection of Tang rulers’ attitudes toward these foreign people can be found in what is known as the Fanqiu Galleries, fanqiu being a term applicable to leaders of non-Han nations. It was a tradition for Tang emperors to install in their mausoleum such a gallery peopled by statues of all the foreign heads of state coming from afar to attend their funeral.

“The Tang emperors, who themselves are believed to have had some non-Han blood running in their veins, thought they ruled the world from its center,” Rong says. “In a sense, for a large part of Tang, any of those who entered the constantly changing borders of the empire were considered its people.”

The boy, for his part, may have been a little too tired or homesick to reflect on such grave matters. He was discovered in the suburb of the city of Luoyang, about 400 kilometers east of Chang’an. (Luoyang was the capital for the Han Dynasty between 25 and 196. Later, during the reign of Tang, the city prospered once again, gaining for itself the title of the empire’s “eastern capital” — as opposed to Chang’an as its western and official capital.

The boy came in between those two periods. The statue is dated to between the fourth and sixth centuries, a time in Chinese history marked by war, fragmentat­ion and, surprising­ly,artflouris­hingandrap­id cultural developmen­t.

The sense of quietness he exudes contrasts with the color and cacophony of the time and place he found himself in. In the ensuing centuries it would be a color and cacophony added to by those who followed in his footsteps.

It (having Kunlun slaves in their households) was a fashion and a fad that reflected a general fascinatio­n with things exotic, a fascinatio­n that gripped all of society.”

 ??  ?? Right: Tang Dynasty pottery Kunlun slave dancer, unearthed in Xianyang city, Shaanxi province. Top right:
Northern Wei Dynasty (386-534) polychrome painted Kunlun slave, unearthed in Luoyang city, Henan. Middle:
Tang Dynasty pottery figurine of...
Right: Tang Dynasty pottery Kunlun slave dancer, unearthed in Xianyang city, Shaanxi province. Top right: Northern Wei Dynasty (386-534) polychrome painted Kunlun slave, unearthed in Luoyang city, Henan. Middle: Tang Dynasty pottery figurine of...

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from China