Biased Western media get HK judiciary facts wrong
In an attempt to defend Hong Kong’s judiciary from vicious, unjust attacks, particularly from the biased Western media, Carrie Lam Cheng Yuet-ngor, chief executive of the Hong Kong Special Administrative Region, reemphasized the vibrancy of the SAR’s judicial independence on Saturday. Without any basis or evidence, some Western media outlets and politicians, including a couple of US Congress members, joined a chorus last week to accuse Beijing of meddling in a Hong Kong court case, in which three young activists were imprisoned.
There is nothing new or unusual about such accusations, as some Western media outlets and politicians are known to harbor hostility toward China. And they hardly let slip an opportunity to soil Beijing’s reputation.
But they were barking up the wrong tree when they attacked Hong Kong’s judiciary and questioned its independence after the city’s Court of Appeal sentenced Joshua Wong Chi-fung, Nathan Law Kwun-chung and Alex Chow Yong-kang to imprisonment of between six and eight months for offenses related to unlawful assembly.
The imprisonment of the three reflects “the voice of Beijing, not of justice”, The Guardian said in an editorial. Chris Patten, the last British governor of Hong Kong, in a letter to Financial Times, said the three activists’ imprisonment is “a further example of Beijing tightening its grip on Hong Kong’s aspiration to remain a free society”. And a Financial Times’ commentator claimed Beijing is “clearly retreating from the commitments ... to guarantee free speech, press and assembly” for Hong Kong residents.
But the accusatory voices were silenced by the swift response from the SAR’s judiciary, the Bar Association and Law Society of Hong Kong, which issued a rare joint statement condemning the “unfounded criticism” by “some local and international media”. The two legal professional bodies, which together represent all the city’s lawyers and have fought for judicial independence, said the judges handled the case strictly based on established legal principles and procedures, and all the defendants were given proper legal representation.
Indeed, the slanderers are guilty of pretending to be unaware of the independence and quality of Hong Kong’s judiciary. The city’s judicial independence is ranked eighth globally by the World Economic Forum, well ahead of the United States (29th). And the World Justice Project Rule of Law Index, which measures people’s experience and perception about the rule of law across the world, placed Hong Kong at 16th among 113 jurisdictions on its 2016 list — ahead of “big democracies” such as the US (18), France (21) and Italy (35).
Of course, facts will eventually scotch the lies. But that does not spare us the obligation to set the record straight.
India stands to face retribution
India has started building a road near Bangong Lake in Ladakh, which, according to Indian media, will facilitate the movement of Indian troops. This suggests India might be preparing for a war with China, or pretending to go to war in the hope of forcing China into making concessions. Indian troops trespassed into China’s territory in the Donglang area more than two months ago to stop Chinese troops from building a road in its own territory, claiming the road would pose a threat to India’s security. Why doesn’t the Indian government apply the same logic to understand that by building a road near the disputed border area with China, India will pose a threat to its neighbor’s national security?
Whether India has the economic and military wherewithal to become a hegemon is still uncertain, but it indeed is behaving like one considering its decision to send its troops into Chinese territory by assuming it is Bhutan’s protector and its insistence of keeping them there leading to the more than two-month-long standoff with Chinese troops.
India claims to be acting on behalf of Bhutan, but many in Bhutan feel India’s protective embrace has become suffocating, according to a report in The New York Times. Pema Gyamtsho, a leader of the opposition party in Bhutan’s National Assembly, was quoted as saying that in the case of a war between India and China, Bhutan would become the meat in the sandwich.
Instead of safeguarding Bhutan’s national security, India is actually bullying the tiny country, as Bhutan doesn’t seem to have sought India’s help. As such, India is taking advantage of Bhutan, in order to assert itself as a regional superpower.
And in doing so, India is punching above its weight, perhaps because it believes China will do whatever it can to avoid a military conflict with India. India’s decision-makers may be complacent in the belief that they have made the right decision given China’s tolerance and repeated warnings over the past more than two months.
But if India continues to think so, it cannot escape the retribution it deserves for what it has done. It’s only a matter of time.