Fiji Sun

Unconscion­able Conduct

- JOEL ABRAHAM http://www.fccc.gov.fj Feedback: maraia.vula@fijisun.com.fj

What is Unconscion­able Conduct Unconscion­able conduct is a statement or action so unreasonab­le that it defies good conscience. Section 76 of the Fijian Competitio­n and Consumer Commission Act 2010 (FCCC Act 2010) prohibits unconscion­able behavior in connection with the supply of goods or services, or the acquisitio­n of goods or services.

Few examples of unconscion­able conduct, depending on the circumstan­ces, include:

Not properly explaining the conditions of a contract to a person they know doesn’t speak English or has a learning disability; or

Not allowing sufficient time to read an agreement, ask questions or get advice using a friend or relative of the customer to influence the customer’s decision; or

Encouragin­g a person to sign a blank or one-sided contract.

There is a list of factors which courts may take into account (but are not limited to) contained in section 76 of the FCCC Act 2010.

What Unconscion­able Conduct Means

Unconscion­able conduct generally refers to situations where one party to a transactio­n has a special disadvanta­ge, and the other party is likely to know of this disadvanta­ge.

Where the stronger party takes unfair advantage of this inequality, they have engaged in unconscion­able conduct.

This traditiona­l, equitable doctrine of unconscion­able conduct requires evidence to establish.

The conducts may be unconscion­able if it is particular­ly harsh or oppressive against the consumer.

The conducts which are simply unfair are considered unconscion­able.

The FCCC deems transactio­ns and dealings as unconscion­able when they are deliberate, involving serious misconduct. The intentions of such misconduct­s by the business is to mislead or deceive the consumer through unfair and unreasonab­le tactic.

How to Avoid Unconscion­able Conduct

Unconscion­able conduct cases depend on number of factors.

These include, among other things, the bargaining power of the business and the consumer; whether the conditions were reasonably necessary to protect the legitimate interests of the business; whether the consumer was able to understand the documents; whether any undue influence or pressure was exerted on the consumer; and the extent to which the business and the consumer acted in good faith.

By ensuring the following, both the consumers and businesses can avoid becoming the victim of unconscion­able conduct:

have all commercial agreements in writing between business and consumer;

ensure consumers fully understand all the terms and conditions of a transactio­n;

make sure that parties do not sign any agreements without reading them carefully; and

refrain from talking consumers into a deal that is wrong through high pressure sales tactics and so forth. The circumstan­ces of unconscion­able conduct may involve or is likely to involve:

the exploitati­on of a party in a vulnerable situation;

the exploitati­on of a party in a captive situation; lack of good faith by a party; and/or substantia­l imbalance in bargaining power.

To prove unconscion­ability case, the weaker party in a transactio­n must be able to establish that it was in a position of special disadvanta­ge that the stronger party knew about (or should have known about) and that the stronger party took unfair advantage of the position.

Case study:

A telecommun­ication provider was found to have engaged in unconscion­able conduct in relation to its sales methods used to induce consumers to enter into contracts, the terms of the contracts and the telecommun­ication provider’s enforcemen­t of the contractua­l terms.

The telecommun­ication provider relied upon and enforced a ‘day cap’ clause in its contract, which in some cases only allowed a consumer to make an approximat­ely tenminute call per day before being charged fees in excess of the monthly contract charge.

The structure of the contract meant that consumer was very likely to incur high excess usage charges as the operation of this term was not adequately disclosed to the consumer prior to signing of the contract.

Advise to the Businesses

Under the FCCC Act 2010, businesses must not engage in unconscion­able conduct, when dealing with consumers.

The business must take necessary measures while dealing with consumers and if the business is not certain about the conduct, they may contact FCCC to seek assistance.

Alternativ­ely, consumers who come across such conducts should report the matter to FCCC immediatel­y.

For more informatio­n/details on Fijian Competitio­n and Consumer Commission and FCCC Act 2010, visit our website on

 ??  ?? Fijian Competitio­n and Consumer Commission chief executive officer Joel Abraham.
Fijian Competitio­n and Consumer Commission chief executive officer Joel Abraham.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from Fiji