Man­u­fac­turer’s Com­ment

Consumer Voice - - Packaged Drinking Water -

a) It is not jus­ti­fi­able to ask for com­ments on the ba­sis of ex-parte test re­sults that are merely typed on plain pa­per and that too with­out any ref­er­ence to an NABL-ac­cred­ited lab wherein such al­leged test has taken place, and also with­out giv­ing us any op­por­tu­nity to con­firm or deny the same on an ob­jec­tive ba­sis. b) It is fur­ther per­ti­nent to men­tion here that the pres­ence of such high count of to­tal vi­able colony and Pseu­domonas aerug­i­nosa is not at all pos­si­ble in our prod­uct Aqua­fina. Pres­ence of mould in our prod­uct was never ever re­ported. Such high count is pos­si­ble only when the sam­ple is con­tam­i­nated dur­ing plat­ing, in a non-ster­ile plat­ing en­vi­ron­ment, or due to use of con­tam­i­nated me­dia dur­ing the mi­cro­bi­o­log­i­cal test. The same batch no. was found well within the pa­ram­e­ters by an NABL-ac­cred­ited lab, Mi­crochem Sil­liker Pvt. Ltd, and by our in-house lab. c) You are re­quested to take ut­most care be­fore you rely on such data which is not in sync with the test re­ports is­sued by in­de­pen­dent NABL-ac­cred­ited labs.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from India

© PressReader. All rights reserved.