Bhan­dari’s re-elec­tion could spell hope for ‘spy’ Jad­hav

Hindustan Times (Lucknow) - - Nation - HT Cor­re­spon­dent let­ters@hin­dus­tan­times.com ▪

NEWDELHI: The out­come of In­dia’s ef­fort to se­cure a sec­ond term for Dalveer Bhan­dari at the In­ter­na­tional Court of Jus­tice could have a sig­nif­i­cant im­pact on the case of Kulb­hushan Jad­hav, sen­tenced to death by a Pak­istani mil­i­tary court.

Bhan­dari, who was elected to his cur­rent seat in 2012, ap­peared to be bet­ter placed than his Bri­tish ri­val on Mon­day but the com­pli­cated elec­tion process in­volv­ing the UN Gen­eral As­sem­bly and Se­cu­rity Coun­cil re­mains dead­locked.

If for some rea­son, In­dia fails in its ef­forts to se­cure Bhan­dari’s re-elec­tion, it will have to go through the process of nom­i­nat­ing an “ad hoc judge” to the 12-mem­ber ICJ tri­bunal that is hear­ing the case of Jad­hav, whose death sen­tence was put on hold by The Hague-based court.

Ar­ti­cle 31 of the ICJ’s statute states that if the panel in­cludes “a judge of the na­tion­al­ity of one of the par­ties, (the other) party may choose a per­son to sit as judge”. An ad hoc judge can also be cho­sen if the panel in­cludes “no judge of the na­tion­al­ity of the par­ties”, ac­cord­ing to the ar­ti­cle.

In Oc­to­ber, Pak­istan nom­i­nated for­mer chief jus­tice Tas­saduq Hus­sain Jil­lani as its ad hoc judge in the panel that will re­sume hear­ing Jad­hav’s case in De­cem­ber.

Ex­perts be­lieve In­dia could be at a dis­ad­van­tage if Bhan­dari does not get re-elected as there may not be an In­dian rep­re­sen­ta­tive on the tri­bunal at a cru­cial stage when the panel be­gins con­sid­er­ing the “memo­ri­als” or writ­ten sub­mis­sions made by New Delhi and Is­lam­abad on Jad­hav. In­dia submitted its me­mo­rial in Septem­ber while Pak­istan has time till De­cem­ber 13 to make its sub­mis­sion.

The ICJ has asked Pak­istan not to go ahead with the ex­e­cu­tion of Jad­hav, ac­cused of in­volve­ment in spy­ing and sub­ver­sive ac­tiv­i­ties, till it gives its fi­nal rul­ing. The Pak­istan Army said last month its chief is close to a de­ci­sion on Jad­hav’s mercy pe­ti­tion.

Jad­hav has al­ready been re­fused clemency by a Pak­istani mil­i­tary ap­pel­late court and can ap­proach the pres­i­dent if the army chief too turns down his mercy pe­ti­tion. In­dia has dis­missed the charges against Jad­hav, say­ing the for­mer naval of­fi­cer was kid­napped from the Ira­nian port of Chaba­har, where he was run­ning a busi­ness.

AFP FILE

United Na­tions Se­cu­rity Coun­cil mem­bers cast their vote dur­ing a meet­ing on the elec­tion of five mem­bers of the In­ter­na­tional Court of Jus­tice, at the UN head­quar­ters in New York.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from India

© PressReader. All rights reserved.