WHAT THE HIGH COURT SAID ON THE CASE

Hindustan Times ST (Mumbai) - HT Navi Mumbai Live - - FRONT PAGE -

DRIV­ING UN­DER IN­FLU­ENCE: The court said the pros­e­cu­tion had failed to prove that Khan was drunk and driv­ing his car at the time of the accident

KA­MAAL KHAN: The court ques­tioned why the singer-ac­tor had been with­held as a wit­ness, say­ing an ad­verse in­fer­ence must be drawn against the pros­e­cu­tion for not ex­am­in­ing him

RAVIN­DRA PATIL: Khan’s for­mer po­lice body­guard’s state­ment was deemed “wholly un­re­li­able” be­cause he told the mag­is­trate that Khan was driv­ing un­der in­flu­ence while, in the FIR, he ac­cused him only of speed­ing

ASHOK SINGH: Court re­jected pros­e­cu­tion’s charge that the driver was a got-up wit­ness; it said the ses­sions court too got car­ried away by the “per­cep­tion of be­lated de­po­si­tion”.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from India

© PressReader. All rights reserved.