Chemical Weapons Attack on Civilians and a strike against Syria..
The Syrian government carried out a deadly chemical weapons attack on civilians in a Damascus , that what the U.S. saying .It seem that the U.S. through the Obama ‘s Administration , loosing power in military as well as in diplomacy , and that is much clear in slow the formation of an international coalition that could use military force to punish Syria, its noticed .
U.S. did not present any direct evidence to back up his assertion that the Syrian government bears responsibility for the alleged attack. President Obama, it seem he is still hesitating and evaluating possible military retaliation, And if that's happen , then there need to be international consequences , Failing of the five permanent members of the United Nations Security Council to reach a resolution for the use of force. And after the British rolled out the attack on Syria.
U.S. would take action against the Syrian government even without the backing of allies or the United Nations, because diplomatic paralysis must not prevent a response to the alleged chemical weapons attack in Syrian .Its clear , that the U.S. response would be limited in scope. And Obama he argued that Syria's use of chemical weapons not only violated international norms, but threatened America's selfinterest .
David Cameron becomes the first British prime minister unable to deliver British troops to a joint military operation with the US. . Barack Obama was willing to show some patience for Britain but he would need to launch strikes against Syria before he leaves for the G20 summit in Russia next Tuesday.
Every One have right to make their own decisions, In spite of the British decision, it remains the goal of the Obama administration that any decision be an international collaboration and U.S. will respect the British decision. So, the United States may have to take action against Syria without the support of one of its staunchest allies.
Washington will continue to consult with Britain, but President Obama's decision making will be guided by what is in the best interests of the United States.
Russia , insists there's no proof yet Syria's government is behind the chemical weapons attack. And any plans to strike Syria would challenge provisions of the U.N. charter,
They accused Washington of trying to create artificial excuses for military intervention. if the United States and its allies are relying on a U.N. mandate to green light a military strike, that is will not happen with the Russia rejection .
United States' responses to mass killings around the world from the massacres of Armenians by the Turks a century ago, to the Holocaust, to the more recent Serbian atrocities against Bosnian Muslims and the ethnic cleansing of the Tutsis in Rwanda concluded that they all shared unfortunate commonalities .United States has acted over the past two years as it has tried to come up with some kind of policy to end the Assad regime's brutal war on its own people in Syria.