(the more things change, the more they stay the same). It is unbelievable that the President would undermine the judicial authority of the courts instead of defending it as he is under duty to do so under the Constitution.
I am a diehard supporter of Nasa and I express my gratitude for the legal battle you courageously fought in the Supreme Court. Given the threats of impeachment by none other than the incumbent president, how would Nasa survive such a motion since majority are from the opposite side?
President Obama served his second term without a majority in both houses of Congress and there was no single threat of impeachment. President Nixon was forced to resign when the rod of impeachment was hurled at him despite having a majority in both Houses. President Kenyatta had a Freudian slip caused by the national popularity of Raila Odinga and the inevitability of his victory glaring on the President’s face. a repeat of the presidential election? Are there emerging issues that warranted this?