Was de­mon­eti­sa­tion worth it?

Mint Asia ST - - News - BAY PARNA I YER


that the Re­serve Bank of In­dia (RBI) has given some de­tails of the im­pact of de­mon­eti­sa­tion in its an­nual re­port, the ques­tion on ev­ery­one’s lips is: Was de­mon­eti­sa­tion worth all the dis­rup­tion?

The an­swer to this ques­tion is a yes and a no.

Nearly 10 months ago when Prime Min­is­ter Naren­dra Modi through a speech purged Rs15.44 tril­lion of cash held by the coun­try’s cit­i­zens, it was touted as a mas­ter­stroke that would rid the coun­try of il­licit money.

The pitch for de­mon­eti­sa­tion was that the bulk of high-value notes of Rs500 and Rs1,000 were stored as il­licit wealth, be­sides be­ing eas­ily coun­ter­feited to fund il­le­gal ac­tiv­i­ties.

Fast for­ward to to­day and the num­bers in the an­nual re­port of the coun­try’s mon­e­tary author­ity show that some of this is true.

Let us set aside the ar­gu­ment that black money re­sides not just in cash but in real es­tate, off­shore in­vest­ments and other routes.

The num­ber of sus­pi­cious trans­ac­tions re­ported by banks to the Fi­nan­cial In­tel­li­gence Unit in fis­cal year 2017 (FY17) has surged to 361,214 from just 61,361 in the pre­vi­ous year. Add the fact that 98.96% of the high-value notes re­turned to the bank­ing sys­tem, and it would seem that il­licit money did find its way back into the sys­tem.

But now what? Fidu­ciary agents should have sprung to ac­tion, which is not ev­i­dent. Public state­ments by the rev­enue depart­ment and other of­fi­cials have at best been pithy as­sur­ances rather than data or facts.

The ar­gu­ment of fake notes too seems to have held up a bit. In FY17, fake notes de­tected rose 20% from the pre­vi­ous fis­cal fig­ure but what was telling is that fake pieces of Rs1,000 de­tected rose a mas­sive 79%. But even then, the to­tal de­tec­tion is less than 1% of the to­tal cur­rency pieces in cir­cu­la­tion. Al­ready, fake pieces of the new Rs,2000 and Rs500 notes have been de­tected.

Which brings us to whether de­mon­eti­sa­tion cleaned up busi­nesses or in­di­vid­ual be­hav­iour. It is tough to say so con­vinc­ingly. There is no guar­an­tee that the new notes won’t be used to store il­licit money, they are al­ready 50% of to­tal cur­rency in cir­cu­la­tion be­cause of rapid re­mon­eti­sa­tion.

An un­in­tended ben­e­fit that de­mon­eti­sa­tion has given is the fall in in­ter­est rates af­ter the sur­feit in liq­uid­ity—this has helped bor­row­ers, but hurt savers. Also, In­di­ans have be­gun to trans­act dig­i­tally more of­ten than be­fore as the surge in digital trans­ac­tions shows. But we still have a long way to go. Af­ter all, 99% of the de­mon­e­tised cash by value is back into the econ­omy, ac­cord­ing to RBI. At what cost have these ben­e­fits come? It is worth a re­peat that de­mon­eti­sa­tion hurt ev­ery nook and cor­ner of the econ­omy. In­dus­trial out­put crashed, ser­vices growth slowed and eco­nomic growth de­cel­er­ated, best shown by the mas­sive fall in growth ex­clud­ing agriculture and gov­ern­ment spend­ing.

What will in­deed make In­di­ans pay more taxes are the tax re­forms and the laws to mon­i­tor real es­tate. RBI be­lieves that the harm­ful ef­fects of de­mon­eti­sa­tion on the econ­omy are tran­sient. The gov­ern­ment needs to en­sure that its ben­e­fits are not.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from Malaysia

© PressReader. All rights reserved.