Oscar: 5 burning questions
It all boils down to how conscientious voters will be ... and if they can get past bad Grandpa’s opening scene.
MORE than a year after four of the documentary nominees made their debut at Sundance, almost nine months after the first of the Best Picture nominees premiered in Cannes and five weeks after nominating ballots were turned in, final voting for the 86th Academy Awards has begun.
The 6,028 voting members of the Academy of Motion Pictures Arts and Sciences have 11 days from Feb 14 to 25 in which to make their picks in 24 categories.
The home stretch has finally arrived in a long, tough, competitive year, one in which the four major Hollywood guilds have spread their top prizes among an unprecedented five films.
Gravity and 12 Years A Slave tied for the Producers Guild’s feature-film award, 12 Years A Slave picked up the Bafta, Gravity director Alfonso Cuaron won the Directors Guild Award, American Hustle took the Screen Actors Guild’s ensemble prize, and Her and Captain Phillips grabbed the Writers Guild’s film awards. As voting begins, 12 Years A Slave,
Gravity and American Hustle seem to be locked in one of the tightest races in years, though the guilds’ failure to reveal a frontrunner, and the huge gap between the close of nominations and the start of final voting, mean that anything can happen.
So I have a few questions. I don’t have answers to these questions, but I want to ask them anyway.
1. Have voters spent the last month watching everything?
It has been 29 days since Oscar nominations were announced.
That’s 696 hours in which Academy members could presumably catch up with the films they had yet to see from the slate of nominees, which consists of 32 nar- rative features, five documentary features, five foreign-language films and 15 shorts.
If you figure that most conscientious voters had already seen a good number of the nominees (if not, they wouldn’t have been nominated), those 29 days ought to have been plenty of time to catch up.
And the Academy has helped. There have been 87 Ampas members screenings in Los Angeles, 13 in New York and 13 in London. Voters have screeners of most if not all of the nominated films, and their membership cards will get them in to many public screenings.
So there’s really no excuse for not seeing everything ... except, I suppose, work and family and stuff like that.
2. What about BadGrandpa?
You’ve gotta love the Academy’s Makeup Artists and Hairstylists Branch. Year after year, they nominate movies that have great makeup, but aren’t exactly occupying space on many year-end Top 10 lists. There was Norbit, The Wolfman, The Time Machine, Click and a number of others. And this year there’s Jackass
Presents Bad Grandpa, in which Johnny Knoxville is disguised as an old man to annoy innocent bystanders. The makeup not only looks good onscreen, it apparently fooled people in real life, making it eminently worthy of a nomination in the category.
But are Oscar voters really going to go to Bad Grandpa screenings, or pop in the DVD? I’m not sure, but I think they might.Besides, the film has a decent 61% favourable rating on Rotten Tomatoes. It was co-written and produced by Spike Jonze, who has three nominations for his work on Her. And its cast includes Oscar nominee Catherine Keener.
But I do have a Bad Grandpa follow-up question: How many Academy voters who start to watch the DVD will make it past the opening credits in which Knoxville’s character gets his penis graphically stuck in a soda machine?
3. How will the new rules affect the documentary and foreign-language races?
Late last week, Academy members received boxes containing all the nominated documentary features, foreign-language films and animated, live-action and documentary shorts.
Some members grumbled that they would have liked to receive the box earlier, rather than getting it only a week before voting started.
But it still gave them more than two weeks to see 10 films and three shorts programmes. Will they?
In the past, members couldn’t cast ballots in the categories unless they’d seen all five nominees in a theatre – but now, they can vote regardless, with viewing on the same honour system that’s in place in every other category.
Over the years, the documentary and foreign categories have had a number of surprise winners that can be directly attributed to the fact that voters had been forced to see all the nominees before voting.
This year, many members and Oscar watchers figure that the results in the two categories will show whether or not voters have watched all the nominees. And the key test will be the documentary feature category.
If 20 Feet From Stardom, by far the best-known nominee, wins, it’ll be seen as a clear sign that voters cast their ballots without seeing everything; if The Act Of
Killing or The Square wins, it’ll be considered proof that they were conscientious.
4. Have voters changed their minds in the last month?
Judging by the nominations, Oscar voters on Jan 16 – or, more accurately, on Jan 8, when polls closed – liked Gravity and American Hustle best, followed by 12 Years A Slave. But those preferences reflect the Academy membership of five weeks ago – maybe before The
Wolf Of Wall Street surged, before Matthew McConaughey and Jared Leto won every conceivable Best Actor and Best Supporting Actor award.
Things could have changed since then; or voters could have known what they liked in early January, and they could still like it in midFebruary.
5. Is there still time to make a move?
This is really part two of the last question. Whether or not voters have changed their mind in the past month, are they still open to doing so? PricewaterhouseCoopers’ Rick Rosas, who oversees the Oscar vote-counting, said lots of Oscar voters turn in their ballots as soon as voting opens, a trickle of ballots come in over the course of voting, and a second flood of ballots is turned in at the last minute. It’s that last-minute group that Oscar campaigners are now targeting.
Still, last-minute voters aren’t necessarily susceptible voters, and favourites like Cate Blanchett and Matthew McConaughey could be hanging on to comfortable leads, regardless of how some avid campaigners and excitable pundits would like to pretend otherwise.
Remember: last year had a big gap between the nominations and the start of voting, too, with lots of time for voters to change their mind. But with a few exceptions – supporting actor Christoph Waltz, director Ang Lee – the favourites immediately after nominations were the winners six weeks later.
So, those are the questions that hang in the air as voting begins. Some may be answered on March 2; others may never really be answered.
Go for it, voters. – Reuters
Dallas winners’ club: With Matthew McConaughey (left) and Jared Leto recently winning every conceivable best actor and best Supporting actor award for dallas buyersClub, will the surge affect the earlier preferences of academy members? — aFP Photo
Cate blanchett with her bafta award for best actress ... will she hold on to her comfortable Oscar lead as well? — aFP Photo