New Criminal Code act from August 18
At a time when the government has made all preparations to implement the New Criminal Code from Friday, a section of the society has objected to some provisions inserted in the new code. Similarly, the parliament is mulling over for changing its name to ‘Samhita'.
The Nepal Medical Association (NMA), the umbrella organization of the medical doctors, strongly objected to some provisions of the Criminal Code 2074 stating that the provisions were against the agreement reached between the government and the NMA.
The NMA said the provisions amount to label the services being rendered by health workers as crime and this has discouraged the doctors from doing their work effectively. In a statement issued on Monday, the NMA expressed its displeasure at the government's move to enact such controversial law without considering the sensitivity of technical issues and against the internal standards. It even threatened to halt services if the provisions were not amended.
At the same time, the lawmakers have tabled amendment proposals to change its name. The new criminal code is the amended form of the Criminal Code Act introduced some 53 years ago. In Nepal, first Criminal Code was introduced in 1853 during the time of Jung Bahadur Rana. Later king Mahendra replaced it with new one in 1963 making reforms. Ending caste discrimination was the important feature of the Criminal Code introduced by King Mahendra.
In the new criminal code, several reforms have been made in justice system. Ensuring property rights to women, increasing ages of marriageable men and women, new provision for men to seek divorce are some important feature of the new code. In previous code, men were denied the
President Hassan Rouhani told visiting North Korea's foreign minister Ri Yong Ho that the United States cannot be trusted as it is unreliable, and all around the world it does not meet any of its obligations. Furthermore, “In the current situation, friendly countries should develop their relations and cooperation in (the) international community.” Iran's domestic situation is also precarious and it is unclear how the leadership will react. According to TIME magazine, the US is bracing for cyber attacks Iran could launch in retaliation for the re-imposition of sanctions. Sometime back, it carried out ‘war games' near the Strait of Hormuz, demonstrating its capacity to block this strategic sea lane connecting to the Indian Ocean. However, if the Strait was actually blocked, it would be an unnecessary provocation in peace time, and would invite sure retaliation [by Israel/Saudi Arabia/US ?]. It would also not sit well with the European Union and the UK. Only last week, the foreign ministers of Germany, the UK and France had categorically stated that the Iran nuclear deal remained “crucial” to global security. They also unveiled a “blocking statute” which was intended to protect European companies doing business with Iran despite the new US sanctions.