Casey re­think­ing sup­port of rates rise

Central Leader - - NEWS - By ELESHA ED­MONDS

Al­bert-Eden house­holds can ex­pect an al­most 15 per cent in­crease in their rates bill, which will in­clude the in­terim trans­port levy.

For Mar­garet Bijl the in­crease in rates will make it tougher to af­ford living in her Mt Eden home.

‘‘It doesn’t take into ac­count the num­ber of peo­ple living in the build­ing,’’ Bijl says.

‘‘I live alone and my us­age of Auck­land city ameni­ties is prob­a­bly very mi­nus­cule.’’

Bijl, who moved from Christchurch to re­tire in Auck­land, says in­creas­ing rates won’t make the city’s trans­port and hous­ing prob­lems go away overnight.

‘‘I sym­pa­thise with the coun­cil’s dilemma of how to man­age this prob­lem but they have been lum­bered with some­thing that the Gov­ern­ment is also re­spon­si­ble for,’’ she says.

‘‘In­stead of the Gov­ern­ment be­ing so heavy-handed they need to be work­ing in co­op­er­a­tion and com­ing up with sen­si­ble so­lu­tions that will re­quire money.’’

One Mt Al­bert home­owner, who asked to be known only as Graeme, says the Gov­ern­ment should be pay­ing for a so­lu­tion.

‘‘I don’t have a prob­lem with the trans­port levy but I think it’s too much in one hit,’’ he says. ‘‘I think the [coun­cil] has a re­mote­ness and doesn’t ap­pre­ci­ate what a 9.9 per cent or 14.9 per cent rate rise means on a day-to-day ba­sis.’’

McCoy D’Silva, 31, rents in Mt Al­bert and says a rates rise is only jus­ti­fi­able if peo­ple are also earn­ing more. ‘‘It de­pends if there’s an hourly in­crease in pay, if not, then it’s not fair. But it’s good that the coun­cil wants to do things.’’

Auck­land coun­cil­lor Cathy Casey says she is re­think­ing her vote in sup­port of the trans­port levy. Casey says she is ner­vous af­ter see­ing coun­cil­lor Mike Lee’s cal­cu­la­tions on the in­creas­ing lev­els of op­er­a­tional costs for com­muter rail.

Ac­cord­ing to Lee, the coun­cil’s trans­port com­mit­tee chair­man, Auck­land trains are cost­ing four times more to run than in Welling­ton.

Lee cal­cu­lated from rail op­er­a­tion fig­ures that the sub­sidy for each pas­sen­ger per kilo­me­tre trav­elled on Auck­land trains was 65c, in com­par­i­son with 16c for Welling­ton.

The Auck­land com­muter rail op­er­a­tion has a ma­jor cost prob­lem as well as a sig­nif­i­cant rev­enue loss prob­lem, Lee con­cluded in a re­port pre­sented to the bud­get com­mit­tee.

Casey says it’s not clear why there is a dis­par­ity in op­er­a­tional fig­ures and whether it jus­ti­fied and af­ford­able.

She says the Auck­land public de­serves to know how their money is be­ing spent.

‘‘In light of the levy we have voted to sup­port, we are owed to know each penny has been ac­counted for.’’

is

The coun­cil’s bud­get com­mit­tee has asked chief ex­ec­u­tive Stephen Town to work with Auck­land Trans­port to re­port back on the cost­ings and op­tions for po­ten­tial cost sav­ings.

‘‘I’m get­ting re­ally ner­vous and I will only be sat­is­fied if Auck­land Trans­port say yes to coun­cil­lor Lee’s in­quiry into the price Casey says.

The pur­pose of the trans­port levy is to raise $500 mil­lion for trans­port de­vel­op­ments over the next three years. Casey says sup­port­ing the levy was a hard de­ci­sion but the coun­cil needed to start ad­dress­ing Auck­land’s trans­port prob­lems.

dif­fer­ences,’’

Photo: ELESHA ED­MONDS

Mt Eden home­owner Mar­garet Bijl says in­creas­ing rates won’t mak­ing the city’s trans­port and hous­ing prob­lems go away overnight.

Coun­cil­lor Cathy Casey

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from New Zealand

© PressReader. All rights reserved.