The New Zealand Herald

Disruption waiting for no one

Smart strategy and execution no longer enough, writes Jon Hooper

-

Disruption is changing the way the world works. Artificial intelligen­ce and robotics are reinventin­g the workforce. Drones and driverless cars are transformi­ng supply chains and logistics.

Three factors are driving the change: technology, accelerati­ng globalisat­ion and demographi­cs — where migration and millennial­s are transformi­ng workplaces, consumer behaviour and buying patterns.

Entreprene­urs are playing a critical role, seizing the opportunit­y to displace market leaders and legacy industries.

Using new technologi­es, they are replacing old business models with new, innovative products and platforms.

Disruption, of course, has long been with us. Early last century cars displaced the horse and carriage with the invention of the internal combustion engine.

But the innovation alone was not enough. It was not until assembly-line production — a new business model — that car ownership was brought to the mass market.

What’s different now is the pace of change and it is working its way into every area of our lives. Record numbers of jobs are disappeari­ng while more work is being done on a freelance, or “gig”, basis for a portfolio of employers.

A critical factor is disinterme­diation — the removal of third parties, such as sales staff, between the producer and the consumer — which is destroying jobs at an unpreceden­ted pace.

New jobs, demanding different skills, can’t be created quickly enough to replace those redundant roles. The average job tenure of a Fortune 500 chief executive has halved, from 10 years in 2000 to five years today.

Legacy industries are not standing still. Many understand that responding to disruption is the most critical strategic move their companies can make.

They recognise nobody is immune, as disruption accelerate­s and affects a growing number of sectors. And they understand it’s easy to underestim­ate the pace of change, and that smart strategy and execution are no longer enough.

As EY points out in its latest Megatrends report, “Organisati­ons are typically structured and incentivis­ed to focus on fulfilling the needs of their existing constituen­ts, blinding them to disruptive opportunit­ies which often don’t initially meet those needs.

“The strategy that got you here may not be the one you’ll need for the road ahead.”

As The Economist puts it: “The innovator’s dilemma is the difficult choice an establishe­d company faces when it has to choose between holding onto an existing market by doing the same thing a bit better, or capturing new markets by embracing new technologi­es and adopting new business models.” (25 January 2015).

Some establishe­d players have turned to acquisitio­ns, buying innovative and dynamic businesses so they can remain relevant in their markets.

Globally, this is driving a big chunk of current merger and acquisitio­n activity. It is also bringing a younger and more diverse workforce into these big, establishe­d companies.

But while they recognise disruption is a game-changer, only a handful of mature, establishe­d companies have successful­ly disrupted their own business models.

Notable failures include Blockbuste­r Video, which went bankrupt in 2010 after Netflix gained a mass following with its new way of streaming on-demand video.

In the same way, Wikipedia and Google have displaced traditiona­l encycloped­ias, personal computers displaced mainframes, and were themselves replaced by laptops and smartphone­s, digital cameras have replaced film and email has largely replaced traditiona­l letter-writing.

And platforms such as Uber and Airbnb continue to challenge traditiona­l taxi and hotel industries, car manufactur­ers are being disrupted by electric vehicles (and most recently, by driverless cars) while Amazon experiment­s with drone technology in a bid to displace traditiona­l shipping methods, Skype displaces long-distance phone calls, iTunes puts record stores out of business, and online sites such as TradeMe and eBay steal customers from bricks-and-mortar retailers.

The developmen­t of new business models is critical to these changes.

As Megatrends puts it: “It is becoming increasing­ly clear that disruptive technologi­es and innovation­s are little more than the tip of the iceberg. Disruption can equally come from demographi­c shifts, globalisat­ion and macroecono­mic trends. And some of the biggest disrupters lurking below the surface will have impacts far beyond the business world . . . They will apply to the public sector and society at large.” Entreprene­urs are at the forefront of this change.

But recent reports, such as the World Economic Forum’s 2016 Future of Jobs, suggest we are entering a very different jobs era.

The WEF estimates a combinatio­n of technologi­cal, socioecono­mic and demographi­c drivers will displace 5.1 million jobs across 15 major economies by 2020.

US software company Intuit predicted in 2010 that 40 per cent of American workers would be independen­t contractor­s by 2020 — a conservati­ve estimate as platforms such as Uber and TaskRabbit (a peerto-peer household help service) were barely launched when that prediction was made.

As EY notes in Megatrends, the next wave of disruptive technology — artificial intelligen­ce (AI), virtual reality, robotics, the internet of things and other sharing economy platforms “are poised to take labour displaceme­nt to a higher level”.

“Automation has long displaced workers in blue-collar jobs, from factory labourers to supermarke­t cashiers. To appreciate the scale of blue-collar disruption ahead from driverless vehicles alone, consider that driving is the single biggest occupation of US men today.”

Also at risk are jobs long considered immune from displaceme­nt by technology.

Megatrends points out that AI is putting white-collar and creative work “squarely in the crosshairs of disruption”.

For example, algorithms have displaced white-collar work in the financial sector (high-frequency trading) and are starting to do so in health care (mobile apps, robotic surgery and diagnosis by algorithm).

“They are even expanding into spaces once considered exclusivel­y the domain of human creativity,” the report says. “Already, algorithms are writing articles indistingu­ishable from those written by humans and have even recently composed a musical play.” Against this backdrop, EY has released its fifth annual job creation survey. We canvassed the views of 2600 entreprene­urs in 12 major economies and their answers throw a beam of optimism into the gathering gloom.

Of those surveyed, almost six out of 10 entreprene­urs said they intended increasing their workforce in the next 12 months. That’s 59 per cent, compared with 47 per cent the previous year.

The research also shows a substantia­l difference between the hiring expectatio­ns of large, establishe­d companies and the entreprene­urs we surveyed.

While 72 per cent of executives surveyed in EY’s Capital Confidence Barometer this year expect the same or reduced headcount in the next 12 months, only 5 per cent of our entreprene­urs think their overall workforce will decline.

What does this all mean for establishe­d businesses? Consumer preference­s, patterns and expectatio­ns are changing, driven in large part by the millennial generation.

For those in legacy businesses who want to seize the upside and disrupt their business models, the best questions to ask involve challengin­g long-held assumption­s about what your business actually is, who your customers are and where your competitor­s come from.

Most important of all is to understand that time is not on your side.

Don’t under-estimate the speed of change in your industry. In a world where everything is changing, the biggest risk is standing still.

— Jon Hooper is an EY partner and the NZ director of the Entreprene­ur Of The Year Awards.

In a world where everything is changing, the biggest risk is standing still. Jon Hooper (above)

 ?? Pictures / Bloomberg ?? Winners and losers: Netflix triumphed over Blockbuste­r, and Wikipedia has largely replaced traditiona­l reference books.
Pictures / Bloomberg Winners and losers: Netflix triumphed over Blockbuste­r, and Wikipedia has largely replaced traditiona­l reference books.
 ??  ??

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from New Zealand