There seems to be some misunderstanding about my letter suggesting people interested have a look on the internet at the paper proving the Greenhouse Effect to be flawed.
This is a peer-reviewed, published paper which proves that the previous theory, and that is all it was, on greenhouse gases is seriously flawed. Current science on any subject is only of worth until another scientist proves it to be incorrect.
The paper I am referring to proves that the previous theory was incorrect and does so using physics. If someone claims they can run water uphill without a pump, physics says it is impossible.
There was no way to prove one way or the other that the greenhouse gas theory was valid because you can’t enshroud the planet and then measure the gas build-up or otherwise, so from a scientific point of view it could only ever be a theory until proven correct or incorrect. The paper I am referring to proves it to be incorrect.