The Roads Leading to Disaster
This Reflection could be written today, tomorrow or any other daywithout the risk of being mistaken. Our species faces new problems. When 20 years ago I stated at the United Nations Conference on the Environment and Development in Rio de Janeiro that a species was in danger of extinction, I had fewer reasons than today for warning about a danger that I was seeing perhaps 100 years away. At that time, a handful of leaders of the most powerful countries were in charge of the world. They applaudedmywords as a matter of mere courtesy and placidly continued to dig for the burial of our species. It seemed that on our planet, common sense and order reigned. For a while economic development, backed by technology and science appeared to be thealpha andomega of human society. Today, everything is much clearer. Profound truths have been surfacing. Almost 200 States, supposedly independent, constitute the political organization which in theory has the job of governing the destiny of the world. Approximately 25,000 nuclear weapons in the hands of allied or enemy forces ready to defend the changing order, by interest or necessity, virtually reduce to zero the rights of billions of people. I shall not commit the naïveté of assigning the blame to Russia or China for the development of that kind of weaponry, after the monstrous massacre at Hiroshima and Nagasaki, ordered bytruman after Roosvelt's death. Nor shall I fall prey to the error of denying the Holocaust that signified the deaths of millions of children and adults, men or women, mainly Jews, gypsies, Russians or other nationalities, who were victims of Nazism. For that reason the odious policy of those who deny the Palestinian people their right to exist is repugnant. Does anyone by chance think that the United States will be capable of acting with the independence that will keep it from the inevitable disaster awaiting it? In a few weeks, the 40 million dollars President Obama promised to collect for his electoral campaign will only serve to show that the currency of his country is greatly devaluated, and that the US, with its unusual growing public debt drawing close to 20 quadrillion, is living on the money it prints up and not on the money it produces. The rest of the world pays for what they waste. Iran has no nuclear weapons. It is being accused of producing enriched uranium that serves as fuel energy or components for medical uses. Whatever one can say, its possession or production is not equivalent to the production of nuclear weapons. Dozens of countries use enriched uranium as an energy source, but this cannot be used in the manufacture of a nuclear weapon without a prior complicated purification process. However, Israel, with the aid and cooperation of the United States, manufactured nuclear weaponry without informing or accounting to anybody, today not admitting their possession of these weapons, they have hundreds of them. To prevent the development of research in neighbouring Arab countries, they attacked and destroyed reactors in Iraq and Syria. They have also declared their aim of attacking and destroying the production centres for nuclear fuel in Iran. International politics have been revolving around that crucial topic in that complex and dangerous part of the world, where most of the fuel thatmoves the world economy is produced and supplied. The selective elimination of Iran's most eminent scientists by Israel and their NATO allies has become a practice that motivates hatred and feelings of revenge. The Israeli government has openly stated its objective to attack the plant manufacturing Iran's enriched uranium, and the government of the United States has invested billions of dollars to manufacture a bomb for that purpose. On March 16, 2012, Michel Chossudovsky and Finian Cunningham published an article revealing that “Atop USAIR Force General has described the largest conventional bomb – the re-invented bunkers of 13.6 tones – as 'fantastic' for a military attack on Iran. “Such an eloquent comment on the massive killer-artefact took place in the same week that President Barack Obama appeared to warn against 'easy words' on the Persian Gulf War.” “…Herbert Carlisle, deputy chief of staff for US Air Force operations […] added that probably the bomb would be used in any attack on Iran ordered bywashington. “The MOP, also referred to as 'The Mother of All Bombs', is designed to drill through 60 metres of concrete before it detonates its massive bomb. It is believed to be the largest conventionalweapon, non-nuclear, in theus arsenal.” “The Pentagon is planning a process of wide destruction of Iran's infrastructure and massive civilian victims through the combined use of tactical nuclear bombs and monstrous conventional bombs with mushroom- shaped clouds, including the MOABS and the larger GBU-57A/B or Massive Ordnance Penetrator (MOP) that exceeds the MOAB in destructive capacity. “The MOP is described as 'a powerful new bomb that aims straight at subterranean Iranian and North Korean nuclear facilities. The giant bomb –longer than 11 persons shoulder to shoulder, or more than 6metres from end to end'.” In recent days, the Iranians have seen how US soldiers occupying Afghanistan, in just three weeks, urinated on the corpses of killed Afghans, burned copies of the Koran and murderedmore than 15 defenceless citizens. Let us imagine US forces launching monstrous bombs on industrial institutions, capable of penetrating through 60 metres of concrete. Never has such an undertaking ever been conceived. Not one word more is needed to understand the gravity of such a policy. In that way, our species will be inexorably led towards disaster. If we do not learn how to understand, we shall never learn how to survive. As for me, I harbour not the slightest doubt that the United States is about to commit and lead the world towards the greatest mistake in its history. *Thewriterisformerpresidentofcuba. *Courtesybyembassyofcubainpakistan.