Why China will not act on North Korea
IN his memoirs, former US president George W. Bush recounts a story about North Korea and China. In October 2002, he invited China's then-president, Jiang Zemin, to his Texas ranch. North Korea was developing nuclear weapons and Bush wanted China's help. According to Bush, Jiang told him that "North Korea was my problem, not his." China did nothing.
A few months later, Bush tried a different tack. He told Jiang in January 2003 that if North Korea's nuclear weapons programme continued, the US would not be able to stop Japan from developing its own nuclear arsenal. Still nothing. A month later, he warned China that if the problem was not solved diplomatically he would consider a military strike against North Korea. Only at that point did China react. Talks with North Korea were commenced, but the hermit kingdom continued its nuclear programme and last month conducted its third nuclear test.
Bush's memoirs provide a lesson to those who believe that China holds the key to the North Korean nuclear problem - an issue that could turn northeast Asia into the most dangerous region on Earth. From the start, Beijing has been a reluctant partner with the US on this crisis and has shown little interest in making the hard decisions needed to force Pyongyang to give up the bomb. To be sure, China worked closely with the US in drafting the latest UN sanctions on North Korea, and some top officials, including the grandson of Chairman Mao Zedong, have openly criticised Kim Jong Un's regime. China's new President, Xi Jinping, is rumoured to be open to different tactics, but that does not change the basic issue as far as Beijing is concerned. Simply put, China's leaders do not buy the US argument that it is in Beijing's interests to work with Washington to solve the North Korean nuclear mess. And if you were a Communist Party boss in Beijing, you might not either. The reasons are both ideological and historical. First, China's main interest in North Korea is not denuclearisation; it is ensuring that the North Korean government does not fall. While Beijing may be exasperated with the Kim dynasty's uncanny ability to wag China's dog, China will support Pyongyang because the alternative, a North Korean collapse, is worse.
While many South Koreans fear the cost of unification with their brothers to the north, China opposes that even more stridently. Hundreds of thousands of refugees would pour into neighbouring China. Then China would have to determine how to deal with South Korean and US troops who would move to secure the North's nuclear weapons. Beijing would also be faced with millions of Korean-Chinese inspired by a new, united homeland. The issue of a potential North Korean collapse is so sensitive that Chinese officials have declined repeated US entreaties to discuss scenarios of how to avoid clashes when and if it happens. Clearly for Beijing, the presence of a Communist buffer state, even an irritating one, between China and South Korea remains critical.
A Korean Peninsula united under the South would pose a huge challenge to China's political system. East Germany is the parallel some Chinese use when asked why China won't squeeze Pyongyang: The Soviet Union collapsed when the Berlin Wall fell. If the no-man's land separating North and South Korea were breached, could the same thing happen to Beijing? China has also always believed it necessary to control at least a part of the Korean Peninsula.