Beware banks yielding dividends
SHAREHOLDERS are finally looking forward to a reward for buying beaten-up European bank stocks. Lenders have shrunk balance sheets, bolstered capital and shunned complex risk -- all while promising bigger dividend payments.
Consensus expectations surrounding dividends haven't been this feverish for a long time: the dividend yield on the Bloomberg European 500 Banks Index has climbed to 6.5 percent, the most in almost five years. It's also nearly a percentage point more than the yield from the region's boringly reliable insurers.
Simply put: banks have more capital, are starting to generate more profits and have promised to return a greater proportion to investors -- and dividend yields are reflecting that expectation. Bloomberg Intelligence's Jonathan Tyce notes the correlation between valuations and dividend yields or payout ratios has grown stronger in recent quarters as lenders near or exceed their capital targets.
But there are warning signs as earnings season begins. The one-time hits to earnings keep coming and international capital requirements are increasingly being toughened by local regulators. Royal Bank of Scotland this week announced 3.6 billion pounds ($5.2 billion) of charges for matters ranging from litigation to customer compensation -- prompting JPMorgan analyst Raul Sinha to cut his capital return expectations on the stock by 40 percent. Lloyds may follow with more charges that will limit the bank's scope for paying div- idends, according to some analysts. Nordea's shares plunged this week after the head of Scandinavia's biggest bank said it was wrong to promise a payout ratio of "at least" 75 percent of profits.
There are more red flags elsewhere. While banks are expected to report increased earnings, at least according to consensus estimates, dividend futures are much less bullish. The Eurostoxx dividend futures index has dropped since mid-August -- not just because the decline in the oil price will cut into that industry's dividends but also because of concerns about the banks, according to Edmund Shing, a derivatives strategist at BNP Paribas.
To be sure, some banks are paying divi- dends: after a grueling overhaul, UBS delivered a special dividend for last year, while ING, the bailed-out Dutch bank, has paid its first dividend since the crisis. In the U.K., banks produced 10.8 billion pounds in dividends last year, 22 percent more than in 2014, according to Capita. Life insurers paid out 3.6 billion pounds, a far less racy increase of 4 percent. That comparison with insurers is important: they simply have a more reliable track record of earnings and dividends than banks. European insurers' earnings per share have enjoyed compound annual growth of 7 percent for the past five years. For banks, EPS shrank by 5.8 percent. Insurers' dividend yields, which trailed those of banks throughout the 1990s and early 2000s, have exceeded them comfortably since the financial crisis.
This all may be obvious when you consider the different regulatory burdens between the two industries: banks have faced far more scrutiny over asset-quality and capital strength than insurers. Tougher post-crisis bank rules under Basel III were agreed five years ago; insurers' new Solvency II regime only kicked in this year. While that might suggest the pressure is only just beginning for insurers, banks are still in a fog of confusion surrounding regulation and litigation a full eight years since Lehman Brothers' collapse.
On the positive side, some lenders have increased their payout ratios over the past five years, while insurers' have barely budged. But that's not a wholly healthy sign for lenders: management can't generate revenue growth and increase the stock price and so has to find another way to reward shareholders. That suggests the ingredients for a sea change in bank dividend payouts aren't there yet.