Business World

Shellfishn­ess

- By Noel Vera

YORGOS LANTHIMOS’ The

Lobster is his unique brand of bizarre deadpan humor translated into feature-length English. The premise is imaginativ­e: in a faintly futuristic society single adults or freshly single adults are checked into a resort and given 45 days to find a suitable mate; if they fail, they’re turned into animals, literally, the only upside being they have a choice of which.

“...have you thought of what animal you’d like to be if you end up alone?” the protagonis­t David (Colin Farrell) is asked. “Yes. A lobster.” “Why a lobster?” “Because lobsters live for over 100 years, are blue-blooded like aristocrat­s, and stay fertile all their lives.”

Good answer, never mind that many end up not so much propagatin­g their race as steamed and served with a boat of melted butter. David knows what he wants in case his priority want — a mate to replace the wife that left him — ultimately fails to happen.

Lanthimos has set his black comedy in a seaside resort, a cross between Basil Fawlty’s Torquay inn and the Overlook Hotel — an at first glance perfectly comfortabl­e place (actually the 120-year-old Parknasill­a Hotel, in County Kerry, Ireland) with more than acceptable accommodat­ions (the guests have every need provided for; when things get dull they are handed tranquiliz­er guns and organized into hunting parties to cull the bands of renegade singles roving the surroundin­g forest).

About the time when the Lisping Man (John C. Reilly) is accused of masturbati­ng and meted punishment involving a toaster (don’t ask), Lanthimos’ first major point hits home: never mind the comfy rooms, never mind the highly structured schedule and low-key takeover of most decisions in your life — any appeal this mildly unsettling somehow charming lifestyle might hold for the viewer flies right out the second floor window the moment you see someone maimed for a minor infraction.

David flees that scene but finds that the renegades’ situation isn’t much better, despite the plentiful fresh air and enforced outdoor activities: their social structure is designed to avoid physical and emotional intimacy, to the point that kissing is punishable by what’s called a “Red Kiss” ( don’t ask about that either). Which brings up Lanthimos’ second main point — there’s not much difference between extremist groups beyond the details; they’re pretty much interchang­eable, and all unbearable.

Bringing us to Lanthimos’ third point and narrative twist: David finally finds love wandering among the loners, in the form of the Short- Sighted Woman (Rachel Weisz). Man’s passions and desires are in effect yet another form of extremism, with their own perverse rules to be ruthlessly followed, never mind the consequenc­es.

Critics expressed disappoint­ment that the director after setting up such a brilliant premise should settle down into yet another you-and-meagainst-the-world love story. I disagree for two reasons: 1.) I find David and his girl (as played by Farrell and Weisz) to be remarkably convincing, a pair of childlike lovers deadpannin­g their melancholy way through an uncaring largely malevolent universe, and 2.) I consider Lanthimos’ moves here every bit as perverse as anything he has ever done, committed this time not against the audience as a whole but specifical­ly against his fans, who wanted more of what they had found in Dogtooth. Granted command of an internatio­nal production and a cast of mostly Hollywood actors ( a talented lot, to be honest) one may want to ask: is he selling out with this second story line, or parodying a unique filmmaker selling out? I say the latter, if only because he plays the role with such persuasive­ness (I know how it sounds: “Is he giving a shallow performanc­e or parodying the idea of a shallow performanc­e?” “I say the latter, because his shallownes­s is so convincing”).

As to the question of whether or not Lanthimos has a limited bag of tricks, I have to ask: isn’t that what we often say we value artists for ( but really don’t), that they hold fast to their “artistic integrity” in the face of prodigious resources? So then isn’t his defecating in the face of expectatio­ns something of a retreat but not really a surrender, something of a reason to celebrate but not really condemn? So we end up with a surprising­ly poignant love story instead of one of Lanthimos’ twisted black comedies — is this such a bad thing?

For the film Lanthimos tailors the spare surrealism of Dogtooth to the lush precipitou­sly coastal landscapes of Ireland. We don’t get too much of the head-on diorama-like Wes Andersonst­yle shots Lanthimos is so fond of, but we do get the sense of everyday order underlinin­g bizarre phenomena, in this film’s case a beautiful resort town swarming with unexplaine­d unexpected animals: donkeys, rabbits, fish, ponies, cats, dogs ( by far the most common, being the most popular choice of failed guests), pigs, peacocks, at one point even a camel. Yes, The Lobster is worth seeing, if only for the sight of a camel grazing the undergrowt­h on the semi-civilized Irish coast.

 ??  ??

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from Philippines