Ex­posed

Sun.Star Davao - - OPINION - Read more: http://www.suns­tar. com.ph/cebu/opinion/2017/09/15/ wences­lao-ex­posed-564185 Fol­low us: @sun­staron­line on Twit­ter | SunS­tar Philip­pines on Face­book

FUNNY how the 119 mem­bers of the House of Rep­re­sen­ta­tives who voted to give P1,000 bud­get for the Com­mis­sion on Hu­man Rights (CHR) next year are slowly but surely be­ing ex­posed for their im­ma­ture ac­tion.

Even those who led gov­ern­ment units that are usu­ally sub­jected to scru­tiny by the CHR even frowned on the act of the House ma­jor­ity (only 32 mem­bers op­posed the peg­ging of the CHR bud­get at P1,000).

“CHR is a con­sti­tu­tional body, eh. Gawa ng batas ‘yan, con­sti­tu­tion yan. The peo­ple there can’t be re­moved. It has the right to be funded.” That’s De­fense Chief Delfin Loren­zana speak­ing to re­porters in an am­bush in­ter­view. For Loren­zana, the ex­is­tence of the CHR is im­por­tant for checks and bal­ances.

“For one, it keeps gov­ern­ment of­fi­cials, es­pe­cially the mil­i­tary and po­lice, na in­gat sila sa gi­na­gawa nila, be­cause any­thing that they will do ay li­able sila sa hu­man rights vi­o­la­tion. For check and bal­ance,” he said. Loren­zana, a for­mer gen­eral, is even proud of the mil­i­tary’s re­la­tion­ship with the CHR, say­ing: “Ini­im­bita ko ‘yan noon para mag-lec­ture be­cause peo­ple should be taught what is hu­man rights sa con­sti­tu­tion.

May­roon na nga tay­ong mga hu­man rights sa units eh—we have a hu­man rights rep­re­sen­ta­tive in every unit of the AFP down to the com­pany and bat­tal­ion na sila na­gl­elec­ture ng mga tao on hu­man rights.”

Even the con­tro­ver­sial chief of the Oza­miz City po­lice, Jovie Espenido has a more ma­ture appreciation of CHR’s role than the House ma­jor­ity.

Espenido was in Cebu City as one of the guest speak­ers of the con­fer­ence of the league of Min­danao barangay of­fi­cials. Espenido re­port­edly said that the CHR should be re­spected be­cause it can check the abuses com­mit­ted by law en­forcers.

He wants the CHR, though not to fo­cus on President Ro­drigo Duterte but on in­di­vid­ual vi­o­la­tors.

If even the de­fense chief and the Oza­miz City po­lice chief can be open­minded about the role CHR plays in gov­er­nance, what does that say of the minds of those who voted to ap­pro­pri­ate a bud­get of P1,000 to the CHR? Or specif­i­cally, what does that say of the mind of House Speaker Pan­ta­leon Al­varez, who fa­mously told the CHR to seek fund­ing from crim­i­nals in­stead? In­ci­den­tally, ef­forts to de­flect the wide­spread con­dem­na­tion of the act is afoot, with the de­fend­ers of the House move fo­cus­ing their guns on CHR Chief Chito Gas­con.

Some law­mak­ers led by Al­varez are telling Gas­con to re­sign, with the im­pli­ca­tion that the orig­i­nal bud­get for the CHR would be given if he does.

Ob­vi­ously, they want to use Gas­con to save face, and he knows that. He won’t re­sign, he said, and would stay un­til his term ends in 2022.

Which brings me to for­mer Se­nate president Aquilino Pi­mentel Jr., fa­ther of the cur­rent Se­nate President Aquilino Pi­mentel III.

A hu­man rights lawyer and a long­time leg­is­la­tor, Pi­mentel de­scribed the act of the House ma­jor­ity as “haugh­tily pre­pos­ter­ous and uni­lat­er­ally im­posed” and a spite­ful re­ac­tion “that (is) most likely borne out of anger that has no place in set­tling in­tra-civil dis­agree­ments be­tween or among gov­ern­ment agen­cies which are all man­dated to serve the well-be­ing of the peo­ple.”

It’s eu­phemism ac­tu­ally for im­ma­tu­rity and child­ish­ness.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from Philippines

© PressReader. All rights reserved.