The Freeman

Hospitals' liability for injuries and deaths of patients

-

The management of hospitals, more than the administra­tion of universiti­es, colleges, and manufactur­ing companies, is a very tough and risky job. Lives are involved and it’s extremely difficult to supervise doctors, nurses, dentists, and other hospital staff.

Disgruntle­d patients and families may file cases of damages for deaths, injuries, or other forms of damages to patients admitted by hospitals. In the case of OLLH versus Spouses Capanzana (GR 189218) decided by the Supreme Court on March 22, 2017, the hospital was held liable due to the negligence of the nurse who failed to provide oxygen to a patient who experience­d breathing difficulti­es. That patient became comatose and vegetative. That was one day after the patient delivered a baby, and after she was discharged from the recovery room and brought to an ordinary room. She complained of headache, chills, and shortness of breath. She asked for oxygen. The nurse allowed 10 minutes to lapse before oxygen was provided.

The patient was found suffering from pulmonary edema after an X-ray. She was brought to the ICU and attached to a mechanical ventilator. She then suffered brain damage. She was transferre­d to another hospital. She was found to have suffered from rheumatic heart, mitral stenosis, and mild pulmonary hypertensi­on. This resulted to a cardio-pulmonary arrest, and subsequent­ly brain damage, loss of speech, eyesight, hearing, and use of limbs. She was discharged in a vegetative state. The spouses filed a complaint for damages in 1998. The trial court held the hospital and the nurse liable for failure to act immediatel­y leading the serious damage to the patient’s health.

The appellate court held that the proximate cause of the patient's condition was hypoxic encephalop­athy, a diffused brain secondary to lack of oxygen. The Court of Appeals said the hospital should be held liable based on the doctrine of corporate responsibi­lity. The hospital failed to prove that it exercised due diligence in supervisin­g its nurses. The fact that there was no oxygen in the floor, where the patient was confined, was evidence of negligence on the part of the hospital. The Supreme Court affirmed with modificati­on, blaming the hospital for its failure. This should be a lesson for all hospital administra­tors and nurses.

The court ruled: "We agree with the courts below that when she was gasping for breath and turning cyanotic, it was the duty of the nurses to intervene immediatel­y by informing the resident doctor. Had they done so, proper oxygenatio­n could have been restored and other interventi­ons performed without wasting valuable time. That such high degree of care and responsive­ness was needed cannot be overemphas­ized- considerin­g that it takes only five minutes of oxygen deprivatio­n for irreversib­le brain damage to set in.” For these, the hospital was condemned to pay actual damages, compensato­ry damages, moral damages, exemplary damages, attorney's fees, and legal interests on all the monetary awards until full payment.

The life of the patient can never be restored. But the behavior of hospital managers and staff can be modified. No one wants such tragedies as this. Had there been enough prudence and focus on the job, all the pains and sufferings could have been avoided. We shall continue this series if only to educate all concerned; the hapless victims and the reckless offenders.

 ??  ??

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from Philippines