ABOLITION AND EMANCIPATION
Although the Abolition of the Slave Trade Act 1807 appeared on paper to end the trafficking in Africans, it did not end enslavement in
the Caribbean. Despite efforts made by the British Navy to suppress the trade in Africans, slavers found ways to bypass the law, including trading with nations who had passed no such legislation. The men who were liberated from slaving vessels by the British often found themselves conscripted into the Navy for up to 14 years rather than being sent back to their homelands.
The rebellions in the Caribbean did not abate in the period between 1807 and 1838. In Barbados in 1816, an armed struggle was led by an Africanborn enslaved man called Bussa who was head ranger on a plantation. Bussa believed that the island’s General Assembly
was opposing English efforts to have them freed, and that therefore they ought to fight for their freedom.
In Britain, women had added a more radical voice to the anti-slavery campaign, and called for immediate abolition. Elizabeth Heyrick, in her pamphlet ‘Immediate not gradual abolition’ (1824) argued that “the perpetuation of slavery in our West India colonies is not an abstract question, to be settled between the government and the planters; it is one in which we are all implicated, we are all guilty of supporting and
perpetuating slavery. The West Indian planter and the people of this country stand in the same moral relation to each other as the thief and receiver of stolen
goods.” The Peckham Ladies Anti Slavery Society wrote a pamphlet advocating the use of East Indian sugar rather than West Indian slave-produced sugar.
Slavery remained so profitable, that plantation owners put economic interests above moral criticism. They reluctantly accepted amelioration policies put forward by the government.
“Slaves shall have one day in every fortnight, except
in crop time, but at least 26 days in the year called Negro days, to cultivate their grounds, exclusive of Sundays, under penalty of £20”, was one of the clauses in ‘An abstract of the British West Indian Statutes for the Protection and Government of Slaves.’
In England the pamphlets chronicling the true state
of slavery in the Caribbean continued to be published, criticising the morals of the planters, and their treatment of the enslaved, and detailing runaways and small uprisings. The Rev. R. Bickell, commenting on the planters’ frustration at the number of rebellions said, “The general cry in Jamaica seems to be that the members of the African and Anti Slavery Societies and their agents, have been the cause, by impressing on the minds of the Negroes that they are free, or ought to be free.”
In 1831, Mary Prince, an enslaved woman from Antigua who escaped from her owners while working in London, wrote her narrative, ‘A history of Mary Prince, a West Indian Slave’ detailing a life filled with violence, sexual abuse and endless labour.
The Baptist Rebellion led by Sam Sharpe in Jamaica
during the winter of 1831-32 finally brought matters to a head. It took two weeks for the British to regain control and property worth over a million pounds was destroyed. Fearful that Jamaica would be lost the same way that Haiti had been, an Act was passed in 1833 abolishing slavery in the British colonies. The planters successfully lobbied for compensation for ‘lost property’, and received £20 million. The enslaved received nothing. Further, they would become apprentices for a period of 4-6 years after which time they
would become free. However, apprenticeship was simply slavery under another name and was heavily criticised by the anti-slavery movement. Joseph Sturge, an abolitionist from Birmingham, travelled to
the Caribbean to investigate this
system, proving that the African Caribbeans were still enslaved. Parliament was eventually
pressured to end apprenticeship on 1st August 1838.