Proteas on the go

CityPress - - Sport - Simnikiwe Xa­ban­isa sports@city­ Fol­low me on Twit­ter @Simx­a­ban­isa

Acou­ple of days ago, I was asked dur­ing a pod­cast what changes I would make to the Proteas side cur­rently play­ing against Eng­land in the sec­ond of four tests in light of their 211run de­feat in the first.

An un­spo­ken def­i­ni­tion of a key­board war­rior is that they spend their lives mak­ing up lists of teams that will never play on any given Satur­day, so off I went with my changes.

I’d move Quin­ton de Kock all the way up the or­der to open; shunt Heino Kuhn down to seven and give him the wick­et­keeper’s gloves; drop The­u­nis de Bruyn, in spite of his gutsy 48 at Lord’s, for re­turn­ing skip­per Faf du Plessis; and re­place Kag­iso Rabada with Chris Mor­ris.

This would have meant JP Du­miny, whose con­sis­tent un­der­achieve­ment in the mid­dle or­der has fi­nally emerged from un­der the radar, re­tained his place. My think­ing was that the Proteas’ re­tal­i­a­tion to the first test de­feat should be based on com­pro­mise and con­sol­i­da­tion.

In that sce­nario, three things would hap­pen.

De Kock would bat higher like every­one says he should, how­ever short-term the so­lu­tion; Du­miny stays there as an ex­pe­ri­enced bats­man and part-time spin­ner (a poor man’s Moeen Ali, if you will) that one hopes Du Plessis will again bring out the best in; and Mor­ris brings not only good pace and bounce, but also great catch­ing and the all-too im­por­tant lower or­der bat­ting to counter Eng­land’s.

But by the time the sec­ond test be­gan, the Proteas had dropped Du­miny and the un­lucky De Bruyn, and re­placed Rabada with Duanne Olivier. Other than prove be­yond a shadow of doubt that I’m no se­lec­tor, the de­ci­sion spoke vol­umes about the think­ing in the camp.

The first thing that catches the eye is that the de­ci­sions were as ob­vi­ous as they were ruth­less: while not re­warded for show­ing more fight than Du­miny has shown in most of his ca­reer in the first test, De Bruyn still took one for the team, while a strike bowler such as Rabada was re­placed by an­other one in Olivier.

This was also an ag­gres­sive and proac­tive re­sponse to the first test loss in that, in­stead of cov­er­ing their bases by hav­ing too many bits-and-pieces play­ers, they have trusted their squad play­ers to do what it was they were se­lected to do.

The trust bit is em­pha­sised by the fact that, while Olivier had only played one test be­fore the cur­rent one – against a gun-shy Sri Lanka on a lively Wanderers sur­face ear­lier this year – he is be­ing backed to do what he was se­lected for af­ter tak­ing 52 wick­ets on the do­mes­tic scene.

All told, there seems to have been clar­ity of thought in the se­lec­tors and Du Plessis’ minds about the re­sponse, with none of the sen­ti­men­tal­ity that has clouded ra­tio­nal­ity at times in the past when it came to putting teams to­gether.

Also, and this is im­por­tant in the de­bate about whether AB de Vil­liers should con­tinue as one-day in­ter­na­tional cap­tain, the team and the think­ing within it is less skit­tish with Du Plessis around.

The ben­e­fits may not nec­es­sar­ily show them­selves in a win in this test, or – in a team boast­ing three out and out rook­ies – in­deed in this se­ries. But the en­cour­ag­ing thing is that the Proteas again feel like a team on the move and not one of com­pro­mise.

The co­nun­drum for most ob­servers must be the dif­fi­culty to rec­on­cile the side that car­ried all be­fore it from July last year to April, and the team whose wheels have spec­tac­u­larly come off in the past two months.

While the for­mats may not have been the same, clearly there can be a psy­cho­log­i­cal carry-over, if the ten­ta­tive first test per­for­mance is any­thing to go by. But the ques­tion to ask is if the Proteas re­ally can have be­come such a bad team in such a short space of time.

I sus­pect part of the an­swer to that comes from un­der­stand­ing that, when a team em­barks on a new cul­ture, there will be times when it bumps its head and goes back to what it knows. So, for the umpteenth time, here we go again.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from South Africa

© PressReader. All rights reserved.