A racist af­fair

‘Ha­jaig and her anti-Semitic fel­low trav­ellers will never per­mit the facts to in­ter­fere with their evil con­spir­acy the­o­ries’

Finweek English Edition - - Nothingsacred - STEPHEN MUL­HOL­LAND

THERE ARE ABOUT 5m Jews in the United States, which has a pop­u­la­tion of more than 300m. Ac­cord­ing to our Deputy Min­is­ter of For­eign Af­fairs, Fa­tima Ha­jaig, an over­weight 70-year-old vet­eran of the strug­gle, that 1,6% of the peo­ple of the US con­trols the des­tiny of the na­tion.

Ha­jaig, a high-rank­ing ser­vant of the peo­ple of South Africa oc­cu­py­ing an im­por­tant of­fice of State, ad­dressed a rally in Le­na­sia on 14 Jan­uary protest­ing against the con­flict in Gaza, a per­fectly le­git­i­mate mat­ter for de­bate. But Ha­jaig re­sorted to in­flam­ma­tory, hate-filled an­tiSemitism when she de­clared that the Jews “in fact con­trol [Amer­ica]. No mat­ter which gov­ern­ment comes into power, whether Repub­li­can or Demo­cratic, whether Barack Obama or Ge­orge Bush. The con­trol of Amer­ica, just like the con­trol of most West­ern coun­tries, is in the hands of Jewish money and if Jewish money con­trols their coun­try, then you can­not ex­pect any­thing else.”

That will, per­haps, come as a sur­prise to Barack Hus­sein Obama – a black Chris­tian of Mus­lim de­scent whose fa­ther was a Kenyan and whose close rel­a­tives are Mus­lims – who grew up in In­done­sia, the world’s largest Mus­lim na­tion and who is now the freely elected Pres­i­dent of the US.

On the other hand, our racist, prej­u­diced and deeply anti-Semitic Deputy Min­is­ter of For­eign Af­fairs might point out that the new Pres­i­dent of the US has ap­pointed as his Chief of Staff Rahm Emanuel, a com­mit­ted Chicago Jew. He was a stal­wart of the Clin­ton ad­min­is­tra­tion where, ac­cord­ing to The New York Times (con­trolled by Jews and, there­fore, in the Ha­jaig world view, no doubt part of the world con­spir­acy of “Jewish money”) he was “in­stru­men­tal in shap­ing do­mes­tic pol­icy on is­sues like health­care, wel­fare and trade”.

It wouldn’t come as a sur­prise to learn that among Ha­jaig’s favourite read­ings is the no­to­ri­ous Pro­to­cols of the El­ders of Zion – de­scribed in the sec­ond edi­tion of The Ox­ford English Dic­tio­nary (Claren­don Press, 1989) as “a spu­ri­ous pub­li­ca­tion of Rus­sian ori­gin pur­port­ing to de­scribe Jewish plans for the dom­i­na­tion of the world”.

As Paul John­son in­forms us, in his mag­is­te­rial A His­tory of the Jews ( Wei­den­feld and Ni­chol­son, 1987), the Pro­to­cols were pub­lished in Rus­sia when that was the only coun­try in Europe “where anti-Semitism was the of­fi­cial pol­icy of the gov­ern­ment”. “It took in­nu­mer­able forms,” wrote John­son, “from or­gan­is­ing pogroms to forg­ing and pub­lish­ing the Pro­to­cols of the El­ders of Zion.”

Wow, I’ve just re­alised Wei­den­feld was a Jew. More ev­i­dence, surely, of Ha­jaig’s con­spir­acy the­o­ries. No doubt her learned the­ses ex­tend to the The­ory of Rel­a­tiv­ity, gifted to mankind by an­other damned Jew, that No­bel Prize win­ner Al­bert Ein­stein.

Speak­ing of No­bel Prizes, there can, in the Ha­jaig world view, be no more clear a Jewish con­spir­acy to dom­i­nate the world. Just con­sider how many of them they’ve won. There are around 1,2bn Mus­lims in the world and 15m Jews. Yet Jews have won 179 No­bel Prizes and Mus­lims have won nine.

It can be ar­gued the three most im­por­tant minds of the 20th Cen­tury were those of Sig­mund Freud, Karl Marx and Ein­stein. In Ha­jaig’s tor­tured world view that would surely be ev­i­dence of a con­spir­acy, as would the No­bel Prize it­self – notwith­stand­ing it was founded by Scan­di­na­vian Chris­tians. But Ha­jaig and her un­hinged anti-Semitic fel­low trav­ellers will never per­mit the facts to in­ter­fere with their evil and in­sane con­spir­acy the­o­ries.

It ap­pears from Ha­jaig’s CV she at­tended Prince­ton Uni­ver­sity (not, as she puts it, the “Uni­ver­sity of Prince­ton”), where she al­legedly re­ceived a “cer­tifi­cate” in “For­eign Af­fairs” and “the Me­dia” in 1997. Your age­ing cor­re­spon­dent was priv­i­leged also to at­tend Prince­ton and for some years has con­ducted vol­un­tary work for the uni­ver­sity in SA.

It’s dif­fi­cult to be­lieve any sane per­son who has been ex­posed to what’s taught at Prince­ton could en­ter­tain such lu­natic con­cepts as does the mind of Ha­jaig. It’s your age­ing cor­re­spon­dent’s in­ten­tion to bring to the no­tice of Prince­ton that one of its for­mer stu­dents is guilty of gross racism. Per­haps they’ll with­draw her “cer­tifi­cate”.

This egre­gious lady is also a mem­ber of the Pan-African Com­mit­tee of Jus­tice and Hu­man Rights. Re­ally? So Jews don’t have hu­man rights, such as that of dig­nity and in­no­cence un­til guilt is proven – as your leader, Ja­cob Zuma, claims as he rushes from court to court to de­lay pro­ceed­ings against him: paus­ing, of course, to dally with ei­ther one of his many wives or some young lass or other even if she de­clares to him she’s HIV pos­i­tive.

Ha­jaig re­cently read a state­ment over the ra­dio re­gard­ing her re­marks and the re­ac­tion to them. She didn’t ad­dress – let alone re­pu­di­ate – what the SA Board of Jewish Deputies de­scribes as “the bla­tantly anti-Semitic sen­ti­ments orig­i­nally ex­pressed by her. (She) apol­o­gised for any hurt it might have caused to the Jewish com­mu­nity (but) the bulk of the state­ment in fact fo­cused on the Mid­dle East sit­u­a­tion and Ms Ha­jaig’s view­points in this re­gard”.

The deputies added: “It can only be con­cluded that Ms Ha­jaig stands by her pre­vi­ous state­ment that the United States and most other West­ern coun­tries are con­trolled by Jewish money power. As such, her lat­est state­ment does not con­sti­tute an ac­cept­able apol­ogy but in fact serves to com­pound the orig­i­nal in­sult to the Jewish world, the peo­ple of South Africa and the United States gov­ern­ment.

“The SAJBD urges the South African Gov­ern­ment to unequiv­o­cally dis­tance it­self from the false, in­flam­ma­tory and racially of­fen­sive al­le­ga­tions made by Ha­jaig.”

Hear, hear – and they should sack her im­me­di­ately.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from South Africa

© PressReader. All rights reserved.