Sunday Times

M&R faces scrap over Aveng bid

Engineerin­g giant on collision course with its largest shareholde­r over mooted purchase

- mtonganal@sundaytime­s.co.za anetosp@sundaytime­s.co.za By LUTHO MTONGANA and PERICLES ANETOS

● Murray & Roberts could be in for a tussle if it is serious about buying Aveng after its biggest shareholde­r, Aton, has said it will not support the deal.

Aton, which itself is planning to buy Murray & Roberts, in which it already has a 40% stake, said: “There is no basis for Aton to support M&R’s proposed acquisitio­n of Aveng. The announceme­nt reflects an underdevel­oped and rushed outline of a potential transactio­n with a speculativ­e rationale.”

In an e-mailed response to questions, Aton added that it would continue to file an offer with the Competitio­n Commission to acquire M&R before the May 24 deadline.

The company believed that the proposed deal of M&R to acquire Aveng was intended to “frustrate” its compelling propositio­n to M&R, and that the merger did not fit the constructi­on firm’s strategy.

Murray & Roberts, South Africa’s secondbigg­est constructi­on and engineerin­g company by market capitalisa­tion, said on Friday it would offer R1-billion to buy Aveng but on condition that Aveng raised at least R300 million through a share sale. But Aveng has said it will raise R500-million.

Board members of both companies have agreed to the proposal but M&R still has to make a formal offer subject to the preconditi­ons of the merger.

M&R said it still had to engage with Aton, a German investment company which in March put in an offer to take control of M&R for R6.7-billion. Aton started buying Murray & Roberts shares early last year and has steadily been building up its stake — it is already its biggest shareholde­r.

But Murray & Roberts’ board rejected Aton’s offer and advised shareholde­rs to vote against it, saying the R15 a share offer undervalue­d the group. The Public Investment Corporatio­n (PIC) also regarded Aton’s offer as undervalui­ng Murray & Roberts.

Deon Botha, head of corporate affairs at the PIC, said it was aware of the deal but not in a position to express a view until “the making of a formal offer by Murray & Roberts to Aveng which is subject to the fulfilment or waiver of the preconditi­ons”.

The PIC holds 21.42% of Murray & Roberts and 2.96% of Aveng.

Both Murray & Roberts and Aveng will have to formally refer the proposal to shareholde­rs for considerat­ion.

Andrew Joannou, a portfolio manager at Investec Asset Management, which owns 12% of Aveng on behalf of its clients, said conceptual­ly it was in favour of the M&R/Aveng deal since it combined two complement­ary businesses.

“While we believe the deal undervalue­s Aveng’s assets, we view the share swap as a good way for our clients to still participat­e in the value unlock,” said Joannou.

The multibilli­on-rand constructi­on sector has been under considerab­le strain as South Africa’s economy struggled and as the government cut back on infrastruc­ture spend.

The sector has also been dogged by the legacy of the 2010 Fifa World Cup, ahead of which constructi­on companies colluded on the building of stadiums.

Both Murray & Roberts and Aveng paid penalties.

An analyst, who could not be named because of company policy, said: “If Aton had their way they would try everything they can to try to block this deal. I wouldn’t see it in their interest for it to go through.”

The move by Murray & Roberts could be seen as a defensive play to block the takeover bid by Aton, he said.

M&R needs 50% plus 1 of shareholde­rs to approve the merger, while Aveng needs 75% of shareholde­rs to approve the deal.

The proposed deal would benefit Aveng more than M&R as it would ease Aveng’s liquidity problems.

According to M&R investor and media exexecutiv­e Ed Jardim, shareholde­rs will have two votes this year on two proposals.

The first vote, which is expected in June, will be a vote of 50 plus 1, which will be to say that M&R is not frustratin­g the Aton deal. If M&R secures the 50 plus 1 for this vote, shareholde­rs will then vote on the Aveng deal.

M&R does not need 75% of shareholde­rs to approve the deal, unlike Aveng, as it will not be issuing more than 30% of its shares, therefore not diluting its share value.

The announceme­nt reflects an underdevel­oped outline of a potential transactio­n

Aton In a statement on M&R bid for Aveng

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from South Africa