Fifa de­fen­dants ‘blinded by greed’, US pros­e­cu­tors say

Afro Voice (Western Cape) - - Sport -

BLINDED by greed into ac­cept­ing mil­lions of dol­lars in bribes, or in­no­cent by­s­tanders? Pros­e­cu­tion and de­fence lawyers opened the Fifa cor­rup­tion trial on Mon­day, two and a half years after the USt un­veiled the largest graft scan­dal in the his­tory of world soc­cer.

In the dock are three fab­u­lously wealthy South Amer­i­can for­mer football of­fi­cials from Brazil, Paraguay and Peru, who are charged with rack­e­teer­ing, wire fraud and money laun­der­ing con­spir­a­cies. All have pleaded not guilty.

They are just a frac­tion of the 42 of­fi­cials and mar­ket­ing ex­ec­u­tives, not to men­tion three com­pa­nies, in­dicted in an ex­haus­tive 236 page com­plaint de­tail­ing 92 sep­a­rate crimes and 15 cor­rup­tion schemes to the tune of $200m (R2.8bn).

Un­veiled by then US at­tor­ney­gen­eral Loretta Lynch in May 2015, the charges laid bare a quar­ter of a cen­tury of cor­rup­tion in the heart of Fifa, football’s gov­ern­ing body.

“Lurk­ing un­der­neath the sur­face are lies, greed and cor­rup­tion,” as­sis­tant at­tor­ney Keith Edel­man said on Mon­day, re­count­ing a meet­ing of of­fi­cials in Mi­ami in 2014 to cel­e­brate the up­com­ing 2016 Copa Amer­ica tour­na­ment in the US.

“Some of these of­fi­cials had other rea­sons to cel­e­brate. They had agreed to re­ceive mil­lions of dol­lars in bribes re­gard­ing the tour­na­ment,” Edel­man told the fed­eral court in Brook­lyn.

The cen­tre­piece of the trial is the US gov­ern­ment’s ac­cu­sa­tions that the three de­fen­dants ac­cepted bribes to be­stow ad­ver­tis­ing and mar­ket­ing rights for tour­na­ment matches, through a com­plex web of fake con­tracts, shell com­pa­nies and wire trans­fers.

The most high­pro­file de­fen­dant is Jose Maria Marin, 85, for­mer pres­i­dent of Brazil’sFoot­ball, the sport’s or­gan­is­ing body in one of the top foot­ballplay­ing na­tions in the world who has been liv­ing on bail at Trump Tower in Man­hat­tan.

His fel­low de­fen­dants are for­mer Fifa vice­pres­i­dent Juan An­gel Napout, 59, from Paraguay who was elected pres­i­dent of Con­mebol in 2014 and Manuel Burga, who led football in Peru un­til 2014 and once served as a Fifa de­vel­op­ment com­mit­tee mem­ber.

“They all cheated the sport,” Edel­man said.

“The ev­i­dence will show that for over 20 years, the de­fen­dants co­con­spired and abused the sys­tem,” he said, agree­ing “to re­ceive se­cret bribes, tak­ing away money that could have been spent to pro­mote the sport”.

De­fence lawyers ad­mit­ted wide­spread cor­rup­tion at Fifa but said there was no ev­i­dence that their clients were in­volved, and sought to dis­credit gov­ern­ment wit­nesses who are likely to in­clude those who cut plea bar­gain deals in the case.

“Marin was not one of them. He is like the young­ster stand­ing to the side while the oth­ers are run­ning full­steam ahead,” the Brazil­ian’s lawyer, Charles Still­man said.

“We don’t dis­pute that a lot of as­pects of in­ter­na­tional soc­cer are cor­rupt. But your one duty is to de­cide whether Juan was in­volved,” Napout’s lawyer, Sil­via Pin­era, said. Burga’s lawyer Bruce Udolf said his client “was not part of it”.

“They are prob­a­bly some of the most cor­rupt peo­ple in the world. They are look­ing at 60 years in prison if they don’t co­op­er­ate,” he said of prospec­tive gov­ern­ment wit­nesses.

“It can make some­one quite cre­ative when it comes to de­scrib­ing cor­rup­tion.”

The trial is due to last five to six weeks and pros­e­cu­tors are ex­pected to present hun­dreds of thou­sands of pages of ev­i­dence and dozens of wit­nesses.

Their fate will be de­cided by an anony­mous jury, cho­sen after doc­u­mented at­tempts at in­tim­i­da­tion.

If con­victed, they will be sen­tenced by judge Pamela Chen. The most se­ri­ous counts each carry a max­i­mum sen­tence of 20 years. – AFP


IN TROU­BLE: For­mer CBF pres­i­dent José Maria Marin.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from South Africa

© PressReader. All rights reserved.