SRI LANKAN DEMOCRACY AT STAKE AMID POWER BATTLE
Tension grows as the country’s elected prime minister resists the president who removed him
It is monsoon season in Colombo, Sri Lanka’s commercial capital, and dark clouds hang over the city. As the skies open, people dash for cover from the downpour amid flashes of thunder.
But it is a political storm that has the country on edge. A constitutional crisis has one of Asia’s oldest democracies teetering on the brink of the first extra-legal transition of power in its history.
Two men claim the title of prime minister, with their continuing power struggle bitterly dividing the country.
Ranil Wickremesinghe, 69, the incumbent premier whose position is under threat, is trying to resist a power grab and refuses to step aside.
Prime minister for three years underneath President Maithripala Sirisena, he has long endured a tumultuous relationship with his boss.
Mr Sirisena supported a no-confidence vote in April that Mr Wickremesinghe survived and the two have fought over economic policy and ethnic reconciliation.
Then on October 26, Mr Sirisena abruptly replaced him with Mahinda Rajapaksa, the egotisGovernment tical populist who Mr Sirisena had defeated in the 2015 presidential election.
The previous bad blood between Mr Sirisena and Mr Rajapaksa is now apparently in the past.
Before his 2015 presidential election victory, Mr Sirisena pledged to investigate Mr Rajapaksa for his alleged role in crimes committed against the Tamil group in the final weeks of the 25-year civil war in 2009, and has also previously accused him of hatching an assassination plot against him.
But he is now Mr Sirisena’s choice for prime minister.
As Mr Rajapaksa, 72, has tried to assume power, however, the sidelined prime minister has refused to budge, staying in his Temple Trees residence – the official home of the prime minister – and calling for an immediate confidence vote.
Sri Lanka is a semi-presidential republic and the right of the president to remove a prime minister was withdrawn with a constitutional amendment passed in 2015.
Despite no parliamentary vote having taken place, Mr Sirisena says he has not breached the constitution. Observers contest this.
It has been a stunning turn of events and, if you arrived in the country yesterday, you would think that Mr Rajapaksa was now Sri Lanka’s undisputed prime minister.
Posters of him dressed in his trademark white robe and red sarong, resembling a sort of Buddhist deity, now adorn the walls at Bandaranaike International Airport, making him the first symbol people see when they step foot in the country.
His photo is branded across the official prime minister’s
website. He now holds the upper hand in the battle for the premiership, despite the questionable legality of his appointment.
Tension is at its highest around the country’s power centres. Large numbers of armed men have surrounded Mr Sirisena’s residence.
He accuses Mr Wickremesinghe of involvement in an India-backed assassination plot. At Temple Trees, groups of Wickremesinghe supporters encircle the compound to protect it while police maintain a wary vigil from afar.
Despite the deadlock in Sri Lanka’s halls of power, everyday life continues as normal in Colombo.
Pettah Market, Colombo’s colourful bazaar that is home to a mix of electronic, cosmetic and fruit stalls, buzzes with shoppers and hagglers as heavy traffic worms its way through the area’s narrow streets.
Market traders seem unconcerned about the crisis taking place little more than a mile away, saying they must carry on, whoever is in power.
Traders here are not talking about it, says A D Rohini, 58.
“The focus is that we have to work with whoever comes,” says the Sinhalese Buddhist parking attendant as she gestures to men on motorbikes.
“What was done was unconstitutional. If it happens, it’s a bad precedent. But I don’t think that people will let it happen again.”
A Sri Lankan proverb holds that if you receive chilli for ginger, you are getting rid of something bad for something much worse. That is the feeling among some residents on the streets here about Mr Rajapaksa usurping Mr Wickremesinghe.
The latter’s economic policies are unpopular for failing to curb oil prices and the depreciation of the rupee, but he is seen as being an honest man.
Mr Rajapaksa is tainted by a string of corruption allegations and accusations that he is beholden to Beijing, which saddled Sri Lanka with billions of dollars of debt through huge loans for infrastructure projects.
While hardline Buddhists revere Mr Rajapaksa for ending the civil war and defeating the Liberation Tigers of Tamil Eelam, others fear that the democratic gains made in the last three years will be wiped out and social schisms reopened.
“It was an injustice to Sri Lankan democracy,” says Haniffa, 70, a Muslim shopkeeper on Colombo’s Galle Face Green promenade that has views out across the Indian Ocean.
“I am not ruling out the possibility of violence given the track record of the previous government. Going back to him is a great concern.”
There are fears that pro-Wickremesinghe protests will be met by larger pro-
Rajapaksa marches that could turn ugly.
But businessman Mohammed Infaz, 35, says he is happy to ignore the political and ethnic tension that might come with Mr Rajapaksa’s return, as he believes his two general stores will fare better under him.
He says Mr Wickremesinghe failed to complete Mr Rajapaksa’s expensive projects, such as an extension to a southern highway to Hambantota, Mr Rajapaksa’s home town, that was meant to be finished last year. Traffic, which can bring the city to its knees, is a huge concern here.
Others refuse to speak for fear of repercussion if Mr Rajapaksa emerges victorious from this crisis.
“This government is becoming very dangerous, that is why it is difficult to say something,” says driver Rezwan, 55.
Fellow driver, Bashir, is less tight-lipped and becomes impassioned when asked about Mr Rajapaksa.
“The situation is not good, says Bashir, 60. “Law is going down. Democracy is going down. Everyone is talking about fighting. Those who have been rejected by the people. If they want to come back, they must do so through the democratic way.”
A port city that lies on an ancient east-west trade route, Colombo has an outwardlooking, cosmopolitan centre.
The city is home to Sinhalese Buddhists, Muslims, Tamils and Moors who mix together and pray at their respective houses of worship.
Expatriates are also here in abundance.
But for the next two weeks, the city will be looking inward as anxiety over the country’s future continues.
In the past 600 years, the country was passed between Portuguese, Dutch and British rulers until its independence in 1948. Colombo, which was central to colonial rule, is a city used to change.
The president suspended parliament until November 16 and there is no end to the crisis in sight. The delay of a parliamentary vote is seen as a move by the Sirisena-Rajapaksa alliance to build majority support before any vote in the 225-seat parliament.
Any victory for Mr Rajapaksa would be tied to claims of vote buying. Mr Wickremesinghe has accused him and his allies of bribery.
Sri Lanka’s transition to independence was largely peaceful, but there are signs that Mr Rajapaska’s premiership will be far from that.