British Archaeology

Janet Miller, ceo at Museum of London Archaeolog­y

British Archaeolog­y talked to Janet Miller, CEO of Museum of London Archaeolog­y (MOLA), in May, just after the prime minister had urged constructi­on to recommence

- Interview Mike Pitts

The overwhelmi­ng view of those who’ve started on site again is they are just so chuffed to be out of the house and out in the open air. Archaeolog­ical work needs to get done for the constructi­on sector to move. It provides all our funding, but without a shadow of a doubt we need to make sure that our people are safe and comfortabl­e. Outside London it’s very easy to keep a good social distance. We can make sure that people get transporte­d safely, that we operate rotas for teabreaks and so on. Going back to work in London is different, public transport is still quite a conundrum.

We also have lots of specialist­s, researcher­s and report writers. It’s been a surprise to find that people are feeling that this working at home lark actually isn’t such a bad idea. I’m pleased about that. The straightfo­rward 9 to 5, be at your desk and be seen to be at your desk, is very old fashioned. People can be efficient working at home.

This is clearly the trend in the workplace anyway. Last year we reorganise­d our head office at Mortimer Wheeler House. We look out of a beautiful wall of window onto Regent’s Canal. It had been clogged up with desks. We’ve made it into a communal breakout space. There’s an open lab there, and you can lay out a whole site assemblage. We have researcher­s working with us who are not part of mola. We are collaborat­ing more with other organisati­ons, and we need more seminar space.

My career is ridiculous­ly backwards. I was what you called a truant in those days, I hardly went to school from the age of 15. I started digging in Cambridge in my early 20s. By some extraordin­ary miracle I got into the university, doing arch and anth as a mature student and a single parent. It was the time of Ian Hodder, post-processual­ism and all that kind of stuff, that’s the stable that I come out of. Then I started digging with the Cambridge Archaeolog­ical Unit. Chris Evans, the director, is one of the best field archaeolog­ists in the country, he’s a great thinker as well as doer. That set me on the right path.

I was becoming as interested in developmen­t as the actual archaeolog­y. So I moved to Gifford’s, a civil engineerin­g company which at the time had a small archaeolog­ical team. I led a masterplan for Mount Wise in Plymouth, dealing with one of the most economical­ly deprived areas in the country and its heritage.

In 1997 I moved to Atkins in Epsom. We gradually developed the heritage team, doing not only archaeolog­ical consultanc­y for major infrastruc­ture schemes, but also World Heritage Site management plans, and research and policy. I worked in the Middles East and China, which I absolutely loved. It caused me to challenge my own quite western-centric orthodoxie­s about how heritage is managed and created, my notions of authentici­ty.

I went up the organisati­onal ladder. We took part in the Change & Creation programme led by English Heritage, looking at the contempora­ry world through an archaeolog­ical lens. That was a real turning point. I started leading the environmen­tal team, getting bigger responsibi­lities in the organisati­on itself, and ended up as director of cities: what are cities? Are they liveable? Can we make them more sustainabl­e? By the time I left most of my work was about urban developmen­t. It’s just part of archaeolog­ists’ day to day work, bringing together a multitude of different perspectiv­es and discipline­s. And probably one of the reasons I ended up doing that is that, you know, archaeolog­ists are pretty good at writing things!

Being part of one of the foremost world cities has shaped mola. When I first arrived I got a series of external speakers in. One of them was this artist who’d been out to the Jungle camp in Calais. At the end of his talk, he says my exhibition is closing in two days’ time, and I’ve no idea what to do with all this stuff. And so immediatel­y – I’d only been there about three weeks – I said we’ll have it! We’ll do something with it! The poor old person in charge of the finds looked crestfalle­n: they knew they’d have this massive logistical problem, bags and bags of material.

His exhibition was about the experience of migration. We excavated a great cache of Roman leather shoes at the Bloomberg site, really important stuff. And now we had some trainers recovered from the Jungle camp. We put them together. Those Roman shoes came from all over the world, by people coming into London and making it a place for them to live. The juxtaposit­ion of archaeolog­ical material and the selfsame kind of modern object, caused you to consider how our world cities came to be the way they are. I felt it was such an important thing to do.

The drive for me is to help mola achieve its potential. Dealing with any emergency is challengin­g, but the real test for any chief exec is doing their bit to take an organisati­on through its next stage of developmen­t, and see that it continues to be ever more excellent. That’s the reason why I am here. That’s the long, hard slog. I want archaeolog­y to achieve its absolute full potential. It’s a force for good in the world.

 ??  ??
 ??  ?? In February mola was awarded a £37,000 grant by
ukResearch & Innovation to run a public engagement partnershi­p with Volunteer Centre Hackney, Single Homeless Project and the Big Issue
In February mola was awarded a £37,000 grant by ukResearch & Innovation to run a public engagement partnershi­p with Volunteer Centre Hackney, Single Homeless Project and the Big Issue

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United Kingdom