Campaigning for protection
THE Children’s Society is calling for a change in the law to protect more than 6,000 vulnerable 16 and 17-year-olds in the south east from cruelty, including sexual exploitation.
While most English law treats anyone under 18 as a child, the criminal law for child cruelty, which dates back 80 years, only protects children from neglect or ill-treatment until their 16th birthday.
It means children aged 16 and 17 are treated as adults and forced to fend for themselves.
Police would find it much harder to prosecute a negligent or abusive parent or guardian of a child in this age group.
It also sends a message that they do not require the same protection as younger children.
Research by The Children’s Society suggests that teenagers in this age range who experience neglect at home are often failing to receive adequate protection from professionals because they are mistakenly believed to be more resilient and able to cope with stress.
In 2010, a couple were jailed for child cruelty for allowing their adopted children to be abused by paedophiles. One of the girls was over 13 and another under 10. If the girls had been 16 or 17 the prosecution for child cruelty would not have been possible.
In 2013, according to official figures, 6,680 children aged 16 or 17 in the South East were deemed by social services to be “in need”, and therefore at greater risk of abuse and neglect. Across England the total reached 42,260.
It is this group – some of the most vulnerable teenagers in the country – who would stand to gain most from a change in the law.
The Children’s Society is asking MPs to close this loophole by extending protections against child cruelty to this age group when it debates the Serious Crime Bill early in the New Year.
The move would involve changing the outdated Children and Young Persons Act 1933 to increase the age at which a child can be a victim of cruelty from 15 to 17, to bring criminal law in line with the rest of child protection legislation and welfare legislation for the first time and offering protection to all children.
Chief executive of The Children’s Society, Matthew Reed, said: “It is nonsensical and unacceptable that adults cannot be prosecuted for behaviour against children aged 16 or 17 that would be considered cruelty if the victim was 15.
“If MPs are serious about stopping child cruelty – including child sexual exploitation – they must act to close this legal loophole when it is debated in Parliament in the New Year.” IN 2012, a woman was jailed for subjecting three children under 16 to a catalogue
of cruelty over several years by kicking
them, slapping them, bathing them in cold
water and gouging their eyes. One of the children was scalded with
hair straighteners, deprived of food and
goaded into stamping on another youngster. The
woman was jailed for six years after a jury found
her guilty of 11 counts of child cruelty. Had the children been 16 or 17 it would
have been impossible to charge her with