WHAT IS FAIR ABOUT OUR CURRENT SYSTEM?
Chalfont st Peter
ANY arguments the Remain in the EU side, led by PM ‘Call me Dave’ Cameron, might have had have been discredited, as if treating us in the worst tradition of an Eton senior boy bullying his ‘fag’, aka slave. In football parlance, only someone who can’t get the ball has to resort to blatant playing the man, or fouling.
The £9.3M tax funded propaganda leaflet of lies, expected of dictators like Stalin, Mao and Hitler, is not in the democratic tradition of equal spending limits for all sides in UK Referendums and elections.
If ‘we control our borders’ then how come – contrary to the Conservative 2010 and 2015 General Election Manifestos pledge to “reduce immigration to the tens of thousands” – the UK still has one million net immigration every three years?
What’s fair about this unsustainable immigration system setting higher hurdles for English-speaking Commonwealth immigrants, compared with EU citizens, versus having an Australian-type pointsbased system – illegal under EU rules – to control numbers and set equitable standards across the board?
Why, has the PM claimed that following a remain vote he could restore supremacy of UK law over EU law? Confirmed by pro-EU former Shadow Attorney General Dominic Grieve MP to be illegal.
Why, prior to the Electoral Commission stepping in, did PM Cameron attempt to convert his 2015 General Election Manifesto pledge of an in/Out EU referendum into a Yes/ No question?
All this foul play, that the PM’s claimed non-deal could anyway yet be thrown out by MEPs, and ex-EU Justice Commissioner Viviane Reding’s claim that 75% of the laws of all EU member states sprout from Brussels, should be enough to convince you to vote Leave on June 23.