Daily Mail

Rotten legacy for Staley

- Alex Brummer CITY EDITOR

THe prospect of Barclays losing its banking licence over events dating back to an emergency fundraisin­g in 2008 is unimaginab­le. Barclays traces its Quaker roots back to 1690 and has been part of Britain’s domestic and global landscape since the late 17th century.

Be that as it may, that does not give the bank legal immunity, and for a period before, during and after the financial crisis of 2008-09 Barclays was allowed to free-wheel by its board. What is really disturbing is that it has taken a decade for financial justice to confront alleged wrongdoers.

The Serious Fraud Office has significan­tly escalated its battle with Barclays and four senior executives. The SFO has now added a charge of unlawful financial assistance to those already lodged.

The latest charge focuses on a $3bn (£2.1bn) loan made at the time of second fundraisin­g in november 2008 which allegedly was tied to a purchase of Barclays shares. Generally speaking, firms lending money to invest in their own shares is frowned upon.

What the case does show is persistenc­e by the director of the Serious Fraud Office, David Green QC, to take on cases against some of the biggest companies in the FTSe 100 irrespecti­ve of contributi­on to the UK economy.

That is why the SFO, both as investigat­ing agency and a prosecutor with special expertise in white collar crime, was establishe­d in the first instance.

The current chief executive of Barclays, Jes Staley, like other UK bank bosses, has been working hard to clean up the legacy of the past, with the Qatar fundraisin­g among the most vexatious of issues. It is also slightly curious since the titanic, if contentiou­s, effort of Barclays to look after itself in the crisis saved UK taxpayers a big outlay.

It is not just UK authoritie­s which are on Barclays’ case. The bank still has to settle with the US Justice Department over alleged creation and distributi­on of securities based on sub-prime mortgages. Sorting this out has been complex because of dysfunctio­n in the Trump administra­tion.

Staley also has local difficulty over his alleged hunt for a whistle-blower, which is being probed by the Financial Conduct authority. It is all a bit like painting the Forth Bridge.

Murdoch challenged

WHen it comes to takeovers, especially one as complicate­d as the Disney bid for most of the assets of 21st Century Fox, it is never over until the fat lady sings.

In an effort to clear one regulatory hurdle, rupert Murdoch’s Fox has committed to maintain Sky news in Britain for at least five years and establish an independen­t board to run the channel – addressing concerns that were raised by the Competitio­n & Markets authority.

Whether this will be enough to convince Media Secretary Matt Hancock to give the go ahead is still a little unclear. Ofcom, the guardian of media plurality, never has regarded five years as long enough and would prefer a commitment of a decade.

There will be media watchers who remember the short-lived Murdoch promises of an independen­t editorial board at The Times in 1981, and how editor Harry evans and the board were quickly substitute­d with placemen. no long-term harm was done but it demonstrat­ed Murdoch’s capacity to forget undertakin­gs.

In the heady days after the deal between 21st Century Fox and Disney was announced, the potential for another bidder to interrupt the game always seemed possible. Cable giant Comcast is thinking of returning with a higher offer which could turn the heads of investors. Or Comcast could use a new offer as a weapon to extract Sky from the deal, giving it a foothold in production, news and distributi­on across the UK, Germany and Italy.

rupert Murdoch may not be enjoying his semi-retirement just yet.

Lessons unlearned

INTRIGUED to see that AIG, the insurer at the core of the sub-prime mortgage insurance meltdown, is back in the headlights.

Its Sun america offshoot was among a number of insurers that sold ‘managed volatility funds’ to investors.

The response of AIG and others has been to rapidly rebalance the funds by selling up to $100bn of stock futures, contributi­ng to Wall Street mayhem.

Welcome back to the naughty step.

 ??  ??

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United Kingdom