Daily Mail

FA warning on costs ahead of vital summit

- By MATT LAWTON and LAURA LAMBERT

THE FA have warned that they face a £72million bill for upgrades to Wembley if they do not sell to Fulham owner Shahid Khan.

In an apparent last-ditch attempt to garner support for the £600m sale ahead of today’s crunch meeting on the proposed deal, the FA’s chief financial officer Mark Burrows even claimed they would be better off ‘handing over’ the stadium than retaining ownership.

Burrows spelled out the expected costs during a presentati­on to county FA chiefs. With £2m worth of work needed on the floodlight­s — as well as improvemen­ts to the pitch, the roof, cabling and beer delivery systems — the bill would be around £18m this year.

He said: ‘Wembley is profitable and we do not need to sell — I would be happy to keep running it and would enjoy doing so. This is a serious and very credible offer and it’s a far better deal than we would have got in the market. A forced seller would not get a deal like this.

‘And the FA will save £72m in capital expenditur­e over the next six years. It’s £18m this year. We are immediatel­y off the hook for this and it’s the biggest number in the turnover

equation. So we would be better off by handing over the stadium to them, never mind the £600m.’ The FA are set to repeat these warnings at today’s FA council meeting about the potential sale, at which 127 councillor­s will hear details of the deal tabled by American-Pakistani billionair­e Khan. Although no decision will be made today — the councillor­s will return to vote on October 24 — FA chairman Greg Clarke will be keen to leave Wembley having persuaded those who are still opposed to the idea. Clarke is not interested in rubber-stamping a deal if he can only achieve a small majority on the council and is aiming instead for a ‘significan­t majority’ amounting to a 60-40 split. An insider told Sportsmail: ‘After the council have heard the presentati­on, it will only be emotion that will stand in the way of the deal going through.’ In addition to any concerns over the way the FA would spend the significan­t windfall from the sale, councillor­s are likely to be aware of claims of corruption at Fulham made by a former employee. The FA and EFL are examining allegation­s by Fulham’s former assistant director of football Craig Kline that he has ‘key evidence of systemic corruption relevant to the Wembley vote’. Police are also investigat­ing reports by Kline of non-recent threatenin­g behaviour by Khan and Fulham’s chief executive Alistair Mackintosh. A spokesman for Khan has dismissed the claims as ‘nonsense’ and ‘bogus’. Khan wrote a two-page letter to FA council members this week committing to being a ‘responsibl­e owner and operator of Wembley Stadium’ if he is successful in buying it. He also suggested the formation of a ‘committee of FA council members who would play a meaningful advisory role on all FA-related stadium matters to guarantee that your voice and counsel will always be heard and respected.’ The Premier League and Sport England also wrote to the FA council.

 ??  ?? Khan: Wembley offer GETTY IMAGES
Khan: Wembley offer GETTY IMAGES
 ??  ??

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United Kingdom