TB-10 Take Two
Socata’s speedy tourer refreshed for the 21st Century
Humming smoothly towards the inviting waters of the Channel at two miles a minute I turn to Cavendish Aviation’s MD, Steve Allen and nod in agreement. “You’re not wrong, Steve − this is the perfect Le Touquet aircraft!”
The French have always had a reputation for designing fine flying machines, but as I walk toward the gleaming TB-10 Tobago my initial thought is that I simply can’t believe that this is a 33-year-old airframe. Built in 1983 by Socata, which was then part of the European Aeronautic Defence Space Company (EADS − THE largest aerospace company in Europe), it has been extensively refurbished by Earls Colne-based Cavendish Aviation and really does look practically new. It is an attractive aeroplane too and, from the tip of the spinner to the apex of the rakishly swept fin, it looks fast even when it is standing still. The pre-flight reveals that it is also extremely well made.
Socata (an acronym for Société de Constructions d’avions de Tourisme et d’affaires) was originally a subsidiary of the French aerospace giant Aérospatiale and − as one of the main contractors for the production of a large number of Airbus components−consequently had the use of a number of highly sophisticated CNC (computer numerically controlled) machine tools. Although more common today, their use in the production of light aircraft was quite unusual 36 years ago.
Designed during the late 1970s as a faster-flying replacement for the wellknown Rallye series of light aircraft, the TB line (TB for Tarbes, where the aircraft were built) includes the TB-9 Tampico and TB-20 Trinidad. Another interesting facet of the Tobago and indeed the entire TB range (as they all share a high degree of commonality) is that the main spar is milled from a single piece of metal. This means that it is entirely free of any kind of join, greatly increasing its structural integrity.
Distinguishing aerodynamic aspects are that its fin and rudder are, unusually, set forward of the tailplane (actually a stabilator or all-flying tailplane) and that there are a pair of ventral strakes mounted under the fuselage. Ventral strakes and dorsal fillets always make me think “Hmm, aerodynamic fudge” as their addition is usually to improve directional stability. However, Steve tells me that in this case Socata fitted the strakes to assist in spin recovery (although the TB-10 is not approved for spins). “Although, in practice, they do assist greatly in hands-off directional stability −as you will discover.”
Anyway, despite my initial scepticism about both the fin and those strakes, I have to admit that upon closer inspection there was very little about the Tobago that I didn’t like the look of. Wherever possible the aeroplane’s skin has been flush-riveted and the entire airframe appears to be especially well made. As the engineers who originally built the aircraft probably also worked on Falcon business jets and Mirage fighters, the very high build quality is unsurprising. As delivered from the
factory, its 180hp Lycoming O-360 drove a two-blade Hartzell constant-speed prop, but Cavendish Aviation is now upgrading the aircraft by fitting three-blade Mccauley units with ‘Scimitar’ blades. Steve was very enthusiastic about the difference these new Mccauley props make, as they are much quieter than the original two-blade Hartzell. Starting with the next aircraft to be refurbished, the company also plans to replace the original exhaust with a four-into-one merged-collector manifold produced by Atelier Chabord. With this arrangement the Inconel manifold connects to an extender pipe that carries a large silencer mounted under the fuselage, reducing noise still further. Access to the engine is reasonable (there are quite a few fasteners to undo) but the oil can be checked via a small hatch on the top of the cowling. It’s quite obvious that Socata made a determined effort to reduce drag, so it’s a little surprising that, despite all three undercarriage wheels being enclosed with tight-fitting spats, the nosewheel’s drag links are exposed.
This must add a considerable amount of drag.
The fuel is contained in a pair of 102 litre tanks located in the wing’s leading edge. The wings feature a small amount of dihedral, but are aligned chordwise with the longitudinal axis, having zero angle of incidence at the root. The trailing edge consists of balanced ailerons and electrically-actuated slotted flaps, with a ground-adjustable trim tab in the starboard aileron. The wingtips are fibreglass. Another aerodynamic anomaly is that the stabilator appears to have very little down movement. It features a full-span antibalance trim tab, while the rudder has a ground-adjustable trim tab.
Overall, the TB seems to be a thoughtfully designed, well-made machine, an impression reinforced when entering the cabin, as access to the cockpit is excellent. There are small steps mounted either side just aft of the trailing edge and, with the large gull-wing doors unlocked and opened, it is easy to step up onto the wing and then down into the cockpit. The non-slip wingroot walkway is also sensibly-sized. Some aircraft have ridiculously narrow walkways and you are always very aware that it would be only too easy for someone to step where they shouldn’t. Upon settling into the comfortable seat I was immediately struck by how roomy the cockpit is. The cabin is about 125cm wide at shoulder height, which for an aircraft in this class is very generous, and combined with the large windows which extend up into the roof really does make the cabin feel as if it is actually part of a much larger aircraft. The rear seat is of the bench type and later models were certified for three occupants in the back, although I imagine that they would all need to be significantly slimmer than me! The test aircraft is s/n0058, and a four-seater. Apart from the two gull-wing doors there is also a separate baggage bay hatch on the port side of the fuselage aft of the wing. The baggage bay can carry up to 45kg, is quite capacious and accessible in flight, although I did think that the baggage bay door could have been a bit bigger.
Extremely spacious cockpit
I thought the cockpit was extremely spacious and quite well laid out although, as regular readers might have already guessed, there are some ergonomic areas that I found less than satisfactory, such as the power control levers. At the base of the avionics stack is a large centre console that extends back between the front seats. This carries the throttle, prop, mixture and carb heat levers, and although they’re correctly shaped and ordered, the colours aren’t entirely right (the carb heat is blue, the colour correctly used for the propeller). Not an issue for the private owner, but the sort of ‘gotcha’ that just might confuse a low-houred renter under stress. Conversely, the pitch trim wheel is perfect: large, nicely geared and exactly where you’d want it (just behind the throttle lever) with the pitch trim indicator adjacent.
Just in front of the power control levers are the buttons for the electrics, an aerofoil-shaped switch for selecting the flaps and a flap position indicator. Unless you’ve flown other Socata aircraft (such as the Rallye) you’ll find the system used for selecting the electrical services to be slightly unusual as they favoured using thermal overload buttons. Consequently each service has two push buttons, a now rather yellowed white one for on and a red one for off. Unfortunately, these aren’t labelled either − and they really should be. The circuit breakers are located in a neat stepped panel close to the pilot’s left knee, and the cockpit also has some very useful stowage areas for airways manuals and the Pilot’s Operating Handbook. The comfortable control yokes are nicely trimmed in leather, while the beefy
rudder pedals are suspended from below the instrument panel. Other good features are that the fuel tank selector and park brake are both under the pilot’s yoke, where they are easy to see and reach, while a small panel in the roof contains useful operating limitations.
I’ve already mentioned that the Tobago gives the impression of being a larger aircraft than it actually is, and this illusion is enhanced by the instrument panel. Consisting of three padded ‘boxes’, the one in front of the pilot carries all the primary flight instruments and also a very comprehensive annunciator panel, while the one on the right contains the power gauges and some additional flight instruments. In the centre of the panel is a large vertical stack crammed with avionics, including a GPS and autopilot, and topped with some unusual vertical-reading gauges that show oil pressure and temperature, fuel quantity and pressure and volts. However, I have two fairly major beefs: first, the annunciator panel is not labelled but simply marked with somewhat vague symbols to show what is what. I don’t care for it. Second, the gauges in the middle (with the exception of fuel quantity) are only colour-coded. Now, I’d rather know (for example) that when I’m cruising at “23 squared” on an ISA day that the oil is at a specific pressure and temperature and the fuel at a specific pressure, so I can track trends. This arrangement is far too nebulous for my taste, particularly when allied with the not-easily interpreted annunciator lights.
By now you’re probably wondering, “Why didn’t they go glass during the refurb?” Well, firstly a pair of Garmin G1000s isn’t cheap, and it is also irrefutable that many pilots still prefer nice round analogue dials, arranged in the classic ‘sacred six’. Having a reasonable amount of time in glass cockpits but having earned my Instrument Rating on steam gauges, I can honestly say I see both arguments − although on balance I do feel that a fully integrated digital cockpit is a superior solution. That said, Cavendish does offer a bespoke service (Steve was adamant that any avionics suite should be “pilot-inspired”) so you pays your money and takes your choice!
On the plus side, the refurbishment didn’t finish with the exterior. The seats have been re-upholstered, the leather--
covered yoke is hand-stitched, and the interior smells like an expensive new car − a minor point, but not an inconsequential one. Steve told me about a recent customer whose wife had commented how nice it was to go from their Aston Martin into an equally sumptuous aeroplane, and I knew exactly what she was getting at. I’ve often wondered how many people have been turned off GA when they arrived at the airfield in a brand new luxury car, and then got into something with an interior reminiscent of a 1975 Austin Allegro.
The seats adjust over a respectable range and, in common with many other modern aircraft, inertia-reel seat belts are fitted. Fine for the passengers, but I always believe the pilot should have a four-point harness. A real oddity is that, when you first sit down, the seats really aren’t that comfortable. (I actually thought I was sitting on some object!) Initially it’s quite obtrusive, but after a few minutes it simply goes away. The doors are well supported by gas struts and it is easy to swing them gently shut. Pulling the locking handle to ‘closed’ draws the door snugly into its seal. The Lycoming starts readily (once I remember to push in the rotary mag switch to start up − another French foible) and, with Steve in the other seat, I taxi out to Earls Colne’s Runway 24.
The Tobago is, like most modern aircraft with a tricycle undercarriage, very easy to
The leather covered yokes are hand-stitched and the interior smells like an expensive new car
taxi, although the nosewheel only steers through a relatively narrow arc so a dab of differential braking is required for a tighter turn. The toe-operated hydraulic disc brakes have a nice progressive feel and the field of view is good.
Pre-takeoff checks are pretty well standard for this class of aircraft, so with the prop set fully fine, fuel pump on, takeoff flap set (ten degrees) and the elevator trim neutral, I carefully line up with the centreline (I say ‘carefully’ as the runway seems slightly narrower than normal). As it is already quite warm with just a gentle zephyr blowing I take Steve’s advice to stand on the brakes and run the engine up to 2,700rpm with as much manifold pressure as we can get. With full fuel, no baggage and only two adults aboard we are around 170kg below the maximum all-up weight of 1,150kg and the acceleration − although far from startling − is adequate. A fairly hefty pull on the yoke is required to rotate the Tobago into the takeoff attitude at just over 65kt, but as we have a fairly forward C of G this must be taken into consideration. Anyway, having used about half of the 840m available, the Tobago is off the ground at around seventy knots and soon settles into a good climb of almost 1,000fpm.
Passing rapidly through 500 feet I press the flap switch to up, turn off the fuel pump, pull throttle and prop back to 25/25, nudge the pitch trim wheel forward and set off in pursuit of the camera ship. The Tobago’s Vy (best rate of climb speed) is eighty knots but I deliberately trim for ninety in order to improve the forward visibility. This is not to say that the field of view is substandard though − far from it. With such large windows and a very generous windscreen it’s actually superb while the subtle tint (part of the refurbishment) is another nice touch.
It really is a beautiful summer’s day, and heading straight towards France in a French aircraft seems entirely appropriate. It’s a shame we just can’t cross the coast and keep on going but there’s work to do, and as we close on the Cessna 172 the window swings up and Keith waves us into position.
When assessing an aircraft’s overall control characteristics I always feel that an excellent indicator is how easy it is to fly in formation, and Keith’s fine photographs quite clearly show that, with very little time on type, I was both confident and competent enough with the Tobago to hold a perfectly rock-steady formation on the camera ship.
Earlier on in this report I said that the Tobago feels like it is bigger than it really is. Well, it also flies like it’s bigger than it really is. This is almost certainly due to the relatively low wing area and consequently high wing loading. For example, the diesel-powered Piper Archer that I tested for Pilot a few years back has a maximum takeoff weight some 10kg more than the Tobago, at 1,160kg. However, its much greater wing area (15.79sq m), against the Tobago’s 11.90) means that the Tobago’s wing loading is significantly higher than the Archer’s – and indeed most similar aircraft. The net result is a much firmer ride. With the photo shoot over I break away from the Cessna and began to experiment further with the Tobago’s handling and performance characteristics. Setting the aircraft up for the cruise at 3,000 feet, I draw the throttle and propeller levers back to ‘23 squared’ and the needle of the ASI eventually settles just over the 115kt mark, for a true airspeed of around 120kt. I have to guesstimate the actual TAS, as although the ASI is of the type that can be corrected for temperature, there isn’t an OAT gauge! Anyway, 120 is a really good ‘going places’ speed, and at two miles a minute in still air the time/distance calculations are a breeze! It can go faster of course, but at the expense of a lot more fuel being consumed, while at 23/23 the fuel flow of around thirty litres per hour is perfectly
The Tobago feels like it is bigger than it really is... it also flies like it’s bigger than it really is
acceptable. In fact, I was pleasantly surprised by its cruise performance, as the TB series is fitted with a constant chord wing, a design not known for conferring commendable cruise characteristics. This TB-10 is also very smooth and quiet.
An exploration of the stick-free stability reveals the aircraft to have strong longitudinal stability and weak lateral stability. The pronounced longitudinal stability is probably a function of our forward C of G, while the low lateral stability (just barely positive) is shared by many modern light tourers. Directional stability is good, helped no doubt by those ventral strakes.
Nicely coordinated controls
Slowing down to explore the stall regime takes a while, as the aircraft is quite slippery, so to shed some energy I experiment with some steep turns. The flight controls are powerful and nicely coordinated, although the ailerons do seem a trifle on the heavy side. Interestingly, and also unusually, all the primary flight controls, including the rudder, are driven by push-rods. The stall is perfectly innocuous, both flaps up and flaps down. With full flap the stall occurs at 49kt, and is preceded by aerodynamic buffet and also a warning bell, activated by a small vane in the left wing. Cleaned up, it stalls at about sixty and, as expected, there is markedly less aerodynamic buffet. This is slightly faster than I’d anticipated, but the C of G is well forward. Incidentally, the stall warner is almost musical, and while it would make a fine doorbell it’s a little too genteel and subtle for warning that you’re approaching critical alpha. Behaviour at the stall is very benign; initially it begins to mush and then gently breaks straight ahead with absolutely no tendency to drop a wing.
Back at Earls Colne a good speed to start from in the circuit at our weight seems to be 90kt, with 80 on base leg, bleeding back to 75 on final with a ‘last-look’ speed of just under 70. Vfe is 95. The TB-10 is very speed-stable and easy to land, although it does seem to like just a hint of power left on all the way down and the stick forces do feel quite high in the flare. Again, probably a function of our forward C of G.
Just like formation flying, you can learn more about an aircraft during a few ‘circuits and bumps’, and with each touch-and-go I feel increasingly at home. None of the landings is bad, but I eventually get a real squeaker, and then call it a day.
Conclusions? Well, the TB-10 offers a good combination of speed and economy, allied with nice handling and a fine balance between control and stability, all wrapped up in a large, comfortable cabin with a graceful, Gallic appearance. Paint the prop and carb heat levers the right colours, spend half an hour with a Dymo label writer and you’d own an aircraft that really does represent exceptional value for money.
Above: xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx x xxx xxxx xxxxv
The TB shows off its plan form - its relatively small wing area/high wing loading helps give a smooth ride in turbulence
It’s an entirely subjective judgement, but to our eyes the slightly angular lines of TB-10 have aged well and, in this refreshed glossy-finish form it really looks anything but dated
The TB’S all-pushrod control system confers nice control response
Cavendish’s next TB, stripped down for a refurbishment that is very much more than skin deep