Scottish Daily Mail

SNP’s Brexit Bill is smokescree­n for another tilt at independen­ce

- Grant GRAHAM

AS political campaign slogans go, it’s hardly up there with ‘for the many, not the few’, or even ‘it’s Scotland’s oil’.

‘What we do want? Control of animal health and chemical regulation­s – when do we want it? Now!’ Mm, it may need a little work…

Yet according to the SNP, we should all be very concerned about the great Westminste­r Brexit ‘power-grab’.

Well, I haven’t seen many placard-waving protesters in the public squares, far less that other harbinger of constituti­onal crisis – Tommy Sheridan with a megaphone.

And if your local pub hasn’t shut down as a result of the smoking ban and the reduction in the drink-drive limit, it’s unlikely that the ‘powergrab’ has been the main topic of chat among the regulars.

This is surprising because under our noses, Nicola Sturgeon and her Brexit minister Mike Russell tell us, the Tories are preparing to snatch key powers from the Scottish parliament.

As a result, we could be denied control over animal traceabili­ty and food hygiene – and some other highly esoteric areas.

The Braveheart cry of ‘freedom’ doesn’t sound quite as exciting when it’s suffixed by ‘to decide on fertiliser compositio­n’.

Holyrood was supposed to be in line for a lot of shiny new powers once the UK had severed ties with the EU.

Some of those are indeed coming to Edinburgh, but a few of them are going to remain at Westminste­r, pending a UK-wide agreement on how they should be used.

Cue outrage from the Nationalis­ts, who have been negotiatin­g with Cabinet Office minister David Lidington to ensure the Scottish parliament doesn’t lose out.

In the case of 83 powers – including water quality and carbon capture and storage – the Scottish Government will take control immediatel­y, from the day we leave the EU.

But in another 24 areas, the powers are effectivel­y frozen, temporaril­y, to protect the vitally important UK single market. The ground that is being fought over is therefore limited, but Miss Sturgeon is furious and wants MSPs to withhold legislativ­e consent for the UK Government’s EU Withdrawal Bill.

It is currently going through Westminste­r with the aim of turning EU law into UK law, ensuring there are no gaps in our statute book.

The wheeze that she and Mr Russell have dreamt up is to rush a Continuity Bill through the Scottish parliament, to bring those contested powers to Holyrood – despite the Presiding Officer warning that it isn’t within MSPs’ legal competence to do so.

Hardly a good omen for emergency legislatio­n: let’s face it, even when MSPs mull over laws for months on end they get it wrong (Named Person and the Offensive Behaviour at Football Act spring to mind).

Ungainly

So just imagine the mess they’re likely to make of expedited law-making – and already the Bill is turning into an ungainly behemoth almost certain to end up in the Supreme Court in London.

In total, more than 230 amendments to the Continuity Bill have been lodged from all parties, with nearly 150 of them submitted by the Tories, who want the SNP to ditch the entire project.

Adam Tomkins, the Tories’ constituti­onal spokesman, has rightly warned Holyrood risks being turned into a ‘laughing stock’ if the Bill – in reality an attempt to wreck Brexit – is allowed to continue on its current schedule.

After a debate on the ‘generality’ of the amendments tabled today, MSPs on the finance committee will meet at 5.30pm to decide on which ones should be taken forward.

Members have vowed that they are prepared for an ‘all-nighter’, pressing on into the early hours, if needs be – something of a shock to the system for the ‘family-friendly’ parliament.

That said, Holyrood will probably be a pretty lonely and indeed eerie place at 1am, after hours of wrangling over the finer points of this Frankenste­in’s Monster of a Bill (particular­ly with Mark McDonald lurking in the basement).

After the parliament­ary process, the Lord Advocate and the Advocate General will have 28 days to refer the SNP’s Bill to the Supreme Court.

If this happens, the Nationalis­ts are certain to claim that the Tories are turning to the courts in an attempt to frustrate the will of MSPs – playing into the SNP’s paranoid mindset of grievance manufactur­e.

Tomorrow, Miss Sturgeon will meet Theresa May, but no one is expecting a breakthrou­gh in the Brexit tugof-war.

Mr Russell, who was brought back into Miss Sturgeon’s top team after making a hash of the education brief, is doing his best to stoke the row.

It’s a forlorn hope but wouldn’t it be refreshing if every now and again we had a little co-operation between Holyrood and Westminste­r – and not a constant, toxic stand-off caused by Nationalis­t intransige­nce?

What neither Miss Sturgeon nor Mr Russell will ever publicly acknowledg­e is that the SNP, if it got its way, would cede all of these hard-won powers back to Europe, in the event of independen­ce.

This fact alone exposes its current trench warfare with the UK Government as nonsensica­l, and indeed hypocritic­al.

Independen­ce supporter and broadcaste­r Lesley Riddoch says, with some understate­ment, that ‘fertiliser compositio­n and food hygiene may seem unusual triggers for Indyref 2’. But she warns that ‘just as Al Capone was finally convicted for tax evasion, so the tone deaf Tory Government could yet be hoist by its own petard’.

It’s entirely possible that some SNP strategist­s see the Continuity Bill as a ‘dry run’ for emergency legislatio­n for a second independen­ce referendum, when the terms of the UK’s Brexit deal become clearer in October.

Mrs May will refuse permission for another poll and Miss Sturgeon will then cite the Continuity Bill as a precedent for fast-tracking legislatio­n without Westminste­r’s consent.

Or Miss Sturgeon, if she does emerge victorious in the phoney war over Brexit powers, could play a game of poker in the autumn – only agreeing to hand any of them back to the UK Government if it gives the green light for another independen­ce referendum.

Gruelling

It’s an electoral gamble, because Miss Sturgeon knows voters of all persuasion have lost patience with her party’s separatist obsession – but her activists won’t wear it if she tries to dump the party’s eternal mission.

Nearly a year ago, parliament was snarled up with a gruelling debate on a Scottish Government motion seeking support to call for UK Government permission for another independen­ce referendum.

Now history is repeating itself, and once again Holyrood is engaged in a timeconsum­ing act of needless introspect­ion that means precisely nothing to the vast majority of voters.

Many of them care more about the powers the SNP already has – such as the one which enabled it to mount a tax raid in the midst of economic stagnation.

The Nationalis­ts are fighting constituti­onal battles that were lost long ago.

But it’s about time they emerged from the parallel universe where a nation’s destiny rests on which legislatur­e controls fertiliser compositio­n – and listened to voters who are sick of their endless posturing.

 ??  ??

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United Kingdom